Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013785
Original file (20090013785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  March 2, 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013785 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he completed 2 years of total service instead of 1 year, 7 months, and 11 days. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his service is not accurate.  He served in Vietnam; therefore, he should have been credited with 24 months of service. 

3.  The applicant did not provide any additional documentary evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active service on 5 February 1968.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 76V (Equipment Storage Specialist).  He was initially assigned to Fort Lee, VA, and subsequently served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 16 July 1968 to on or about 13 September 1969.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 15 September 1969 and he was transferred to the control of the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) for completion of his Reserve obligation.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the following entries:

	a.  item 10c (Date Inducted) shows the entry "5 FEB 68";

	b.  item 11d (Effective Date) shows the entry "15 SEP 69";

	c.  item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) shows the entry "1  7  11";

	d.  item 22a(2) (Other Service) shows the entry "0  0  0";

	e.  item 22a(3) (Total) shows the entry "1  7  11"; and 

	f.  item 22b (Total Active Service) shows the entry "1  7  11."

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation directs, in pertinent part, that the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  Chapter 2 of the regulation contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  Item 10c of the version in effect at the time applied only to members who were inducted and showed the date of induction; item 11d showed the date separation was accomplished; item 22a(1) showed the total service completed between the dates shown in items 10c and 11d of the DD Form 214; item 22a(2) showed all prior service excluding any service shown in item 22a(1), item 22a(3) showed the total of items 22a(1) and 22a(2), and item 22b showed the total service the member had completed beginning with the earliest period of active duty up to and including the current period of active duty less any time lost.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was inducted and entered active service on 5 February 1968.  He served at Fort Lee, VA, and in the Republic of Vietnam and was honorably released from active duty on 15 September 1969.  He completed a total of 1 year, 7 months, and 11 days of creditable active service which is correctly shown on his DD Form 214.

2.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty, to include attendance at basic and advanced training, and it will be prepared for all personnel at the time of retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant did not submit any evidence that indicates he completed any other period of active service that was not properly documented on his DD Form 214.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  He has not shown error, injustice, or inequity for the relief he requests.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013785



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013785



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000265

    Original file (20110000265.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states a DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service. It further stated: a. item 22a(1) would show the total service between dates shown in items 10c or 17c and 11d of the DD Form 214, as represented by continual and foreign service, less time lost; b. item 22a(2) would show all prior service excluding any service shown in item 22a(1); c. item 22a(3) is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012190

    Original file (20080012190.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that item 17c, of his DD Form 214, has a strikeover and item 22a(1), 22a(3), and 22b show the incorrect years of service. Item 17c, of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows the entry "9 Sep 66" (9 September 1966), which is correct; however, as indicated by the applicant, does contain a "strikeover." Item 22a(1) will be completed by entering the total service completed in item 10c (Dated Inducted) or 17c (Date of Entry) and 11d (Effective Date) of the DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013047

    Original file (20080013047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to add all his medals and that his service dates be corrected at the same time. However, based on his service in Vietnam he is entitled to correction of Item 30 to show his inclusive period of service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Items...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010502

    Original file (20080010502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence clearly shows that he completed 4 months and 10 days of total active service. However, the evidence clearly shows that he only completed 4 months and 10 days of active duty service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the entry, "0 4 10," in item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period), of his DD Form 214; and b. showing the entry "0 4 10," in item 22b (Total Active Service), of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021301

    Original file (20110021301.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 13 May 1970 to show his date of entry on active duty as 6 April 1970 instead of 7 May 1970. Item 38 (Record of Assignment) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he entered active duty on 7 April 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000041

    Original file (20080000041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the date of induction and date of expiration shown on his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. Item 11d (Effective Date) of his DD Form 214, expiration of term of service, shows the entry "20 Nov 70." A review of DD Form 47 (Record of Induction), which was taken from the applicant's military personnel record shows that the applicant's date of induction was 22 November 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001032

    Original file (20090001032.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states no RVN service awards are listed on the DD Form 214. The evidence of record confirms the applicant served on active duty for 1 year, 9 months, and 15 days between 9 March 1967 and 23 December 1968 and that he had no prior military service. Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 9 March 1967 through 23 December 1968 and to add this award to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008581

    Original file (20100008581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation further states when a member returned from an absence that is or appears to be unauthorized, the unit commander will informally investigate the case at once. A copy of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows the AWOL time during the period 25 September 1969 - 4 November 1969 was to be made good per the letter from the 257th Replacement Company, dated 11 April 1970. Therefore, this portion of his DD Form, 214 should be corrected to remove the erroneous period of AWOL and to show 40...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014933

    Original file (20090014933.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s DD Form 214 to show he completed 2 years, 10 months, and 15 days of active military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022164

    Original file (20100022164.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 17c (Date of Entry) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he entered active service on 27 November 1964 instead of 27 November 1965. His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 11d (Effective Date) the entry 26 November 1967 * item 16 the entry 26 November 1971 * item 17c the entry 27 November 1965 6. Based on the correction to the applicant's date of entry, his net service during the period...