IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 5 January 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013560
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states he and another Soldier were injured when their Sheridan tank hit a mine on either 21 or 27 January 1971. They were medically evacuated and he overheard a doctor telling a medical aidman to prepare the paperwork for the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant provides no supporting documentation.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's service medical and dental records are believed to be on permanent loan to the Department of Veterans Affairs and are not available for review.
3. The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Army from 21 May 1968 through 29 April 1972 in military occupational specialty 11E (Armor Crewman).
4. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows two periods of assignment in Vietnam, from 21 March 1969 through 3 September 1969 and from 18 April 1970 through 21 February 1971. It does not show any periods of service as a patient.
5. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 29 April 1972. His 22 January 1969 DD Form 214 lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal, the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). His 29 April 1972 DD Form 214 list his awards as the Vietnam Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).
6. The review of the Vietnam casualty roster failed to locate any reference to the applicant.
7. The review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for any awards.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant states he and another Soldier were injured when their Sheridan tank hit a mine on either 21 or 27 January 1971. They were medically evacuated and he overheard a doctor telling a medical aidman to prepare the paperwork for the Purple Heart.
2. The record does not contain and the applicant has not provided any documentation to show the applicant sustained a wound as the result of hostile action that required treatment by medical personnel that was made a matter of official record. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to award him the Purple Heart.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__x_____ ___x____ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________X_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090013560
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090013560
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003370
It states a bar is authorized for wear for each period of active Federal service as a member of the U.S. Army outside of the continental limits of the United States for the specific time frames and areas of operation cited in Army Regulation 670-1 or appropriate Department of the Army message. He served a qualifying period of service for award of two overseas service bars; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show 5. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004505
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017062
There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, there is no evidence of record which shows the wounded Soldier was the applicant. In the absence of orders or other corroborating evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in the Republic of Vietnam, the documentation and the emails provided by the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014942
The applicant provided the following additional documentary evidence in support of his application: a. DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 2 September 1971. b. There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart, there is no evidence in his service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds, and the applicant's name is not listed on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001178
The applicant states that he was wounded in action on 20 September 1968 while serving as a medical specialist with an infantry company in the Republic of Vietnam. Records show that the applicant participated in four campaign periods during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart (third award) for wounds received on 20 September 1968; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017465
During Vietnam, the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Purple Heart for injuries received on 18 November 1968 and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001728
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that shows he was wounded in action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. However, the evidence the applicant provides in the form of a newspaper article and an unidentified VA medical record provide insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002968
A review of the applicants military personnel records revealed that there are no orders in the applicants records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. This Army regulation, in pertinent part, states that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the applicants military personnel records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not list the Purple Heart in item 41; the applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007293C071029
He is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal; however, the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show this award among his authorized awards. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows the unit the applicant was assigned to was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class, Unit Citation, for the period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008953
He states that he was among the wounded. The available evidence also shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result of being hit by nails from a claymore on 11 April 1969. Evidence of record shows that although he received orders for a Purple Heart for wounds received on 4 August 1969 while assigned to the 12th Evacuation Hospital there is no evidence of record nor did the applicant provide any evidence which shows he was wounded on 4 August 1969.