Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013479
Original file (20090013479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013479 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his correct pay grade and to receive back pay due as a result of the correction.

2.  The applicant states that at the time of his entry into active duty his rank was private first class, pay grade E-3.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows his rank as private, pay grade E-2 at the time of his entry active duty.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 55 (Honorable Discharge Certificate), NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), DD Form 214, separation orders, and Honorable Discharge Certificate from the Army of the United States in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service member's records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there are sufficient documents available to conduct a fair and impartial review of this specific request.

3.  The applicant's NGB Form 22 shows the following:

	a.  On 6 December 1954, he enlisted in the Missouri Army National Guard for a period of 3 years.

	b.  He attained the rank of private first class as an infantry Soldier.

   c.  On 25 February 1957, he was discharged from the Missouri Army National Guard and concurrently enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214, effective 17 April 1959, shows the following:

	a.  On 1 May 1957, he was called to active duty as a Reservist in the rank of private, pay grade E-2.

   b.  On 17 April 1959, he was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  He had attained the rank of specialist four, pay grade E-4, on 4 February 1959.

5.  On 29 April 1961, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Army of the United States.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that he was called to active duty as a Reservist in the rank of private first class, pay grade E-3, instead of as a private, pay grade E-2.  This resulted in his loss of pay and allowances.

2.  The available records provided by the applicant show that he attained the rank of private first class, pay grade E-3, during his service in the Missouri Army National Guard.  He was subsequently discharged on 25 February 1957 with this same rank.

3.  The available evidence further shows that the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 25 February 1957.  However, the available evidence does not show that he retained his rank of private first class, pay grade E-3.

4.  There is no available evidence for the period from 26 February 1957 to 30 April 1957 showing the applicant's rank and pay grade as a Reservist prior to being called to active duty.

5.  Accordingly, the applicant's DD Form 214 that shows he was ordered to active duty as a Reservist on 1 May 1957 in the rank of private, pay grade E-2, is presumed to be correct.  His DD Form 214 also shows that he was advanced to specialist four, pay grade E-4, on 4 February 1959.

6.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013479



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013479



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003492C070205

    Original file (20060003492C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was placed on the retired list in the rank of sergeant first class (SFC), pay grade E- 7. There is no error or injustice in this case regarding the applicant’s retired grade and there is no basis to show he was placed on the retired list in the rank of SFC, E-7 or to pay him SFC, E-7 retired pay. Linda Simmons_________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX |CASE ID |AR20060003492 | |SUFFIX | | |RECON |YYYYMMDD | |DATE BOARDED |20060928 | |TYPE OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071201C070402

    Original file (2002071201C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that items 21 (Date and Place of Enlistment) and 29 (Highest Grade Held) of his NGB (National Guard Bureau) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service in the Army National Guard (ARNG) of Wisconsin and as a Reserve of the Army), dated 28 September 1959, be corrected to show that he enlisted on 12 January 1953, in White Fish Bay, Wisconsin and served as a SP-5 (specialist fifth class). He was discharged from the Control Group on 11 January 1961, in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091783C070212

    Original file (2003091783C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SPC on 10 August 1996 and laterally appointed to CPL with an effective date of 25 March 2000. In his rebuttal to the advisory opinion, the applicant confuses his 23 April 2001 discharge date from the Army National Guard with his 23 May 2003 discharge date from the U.S. Army Reserve. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Department of the Army,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000537

    Original file (20080000537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000537 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that her father's records be corrected to show, in effect, that he retired in the rank of sergeant first class (SFC), pay grade E-7. The FSM's record shows he entered into the USAR on 5 February 1957 and was discharged on 24 July 1963, in the rank of staff sergeant (SSG)/pay grade E-6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008373

    Original file (20090008373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 October 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008373 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides, in support of his applications, two DD Forms 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records Under the Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, dated 20 April; 2009 and 27 May 2009; DD Forms 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods ending 15 August 1957 and 25 October 1969; an ARPC Form 271 (Reserve Order EK - 2343), dated 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040007618C070208

    Original file (040007618C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his pay grade as E-4, vice the pay grade of E-3 shown. There is no evidence and the applicant has not submitted any to show that he served in the pay grade of E-4 or was promoted to that pay grade. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014301

    Original file (20080014301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was issued a DD Form 214 for active duty service from 5 January to 17 April 1953. k. Applicant’s letter to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, dated 23 January 2001, subject: DD Form 149, that shows he previously presented his case to this Board requesting a DD Form 214. l. Applicant’s letter to the VA, Medical Administration Services, Regional Office Center, Wichita, Kansas, dated 27 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053194C070420

    Original file (2001053194C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The only documents associated with the applicant’s military service were those submitted by the applicant in support of his petition to this Board. The available evidence does, however, support a conclusion that the applicant was on active duty between 14 February 1957 and 7 June 1957 while undergoing training as a medical laboratory specialist and he should have received a DD Form 214. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004481

    Original file (20070004481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. All separations, voluntary or involuntary, from the AGR program will be governed by the following regulations: ARNGUS soldiers, released from FTNGD, while serving in the AGR program under the provisions (UP) of 32 USC are subject to separation UP of AR 135–175 (officers) or AR 135–178 (enlisted), or as further provided UP NGR 600–5. In the processing of this case, the Board’s staff contacted the proponent of AR 135-178 who stated that this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004060

    Original file (20120004060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows in: * Items 5a (Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) the entries "PFC" and "E-3" respectively * Item 6 (Date of Rank) shows the entry "94 10 15" 6. He enlisted in the Regular Army in the rank/grade of PV2/E-2 for a period of 3 years on 2 February 1995 and proceeded to Fort Benning, Georgia, for infantry training. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) confirms he completed 1 month...