Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013470
Original file (20090013470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 December 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013470 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 3 on his
26 June 2008 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed so that he may be eligible to enlist in the Army.

2.  The applicant states that he was separated on 26 June 2008 for medical reasons which were identified in Basic Training.  He offers that at the time of his discharge he was not in pain, however, he had a history of low back pain and that it was resolved with surgery.  Since having the surgery, he has been examined by a medical doctor and released without restriction.

3.  The applicant provides an Update to Physical Profile, Medical Records from the Piedmont Neurosurgical Group, and a Congressional Inquiry. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 17 April 2008.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 26 June 2008 under the provisions of paragraph 5-11, Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administration Separations), for failing medical physical procurement standards with uncharacterized service.  Item 26 shows he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of "JFW" and item 27 shows his RE code was "3."  The applicant was credited with completing 2 months and 10 days of active service.
3.  Medical Records from the Piedmont Neurosurgical Group, dated 27 October 2008, shows the applicant was physically cleared for entry into the military.  The physical exam shows the applicant was asymptomatic since his surgery with no recurring back or radiating lower extremity pain.

4.  The applicant’s update to physical profile, dated 19 February 2009, shows he was physically cleared by a private physician.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 5-11 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating personnel who did not meet procurement medical fitness standards.  The regulation states that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or those who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty (AD) or AD for initial entry training may be separated.  Such conditions must be discovered during the first 6 months of AD.  Such findings will result in an entrance physical standards board.  This board, which must be convened within the Soldier's first 6 months of AD, takes the place of the notification procedures required for separation.  The Soldier will be separated within 72 hours following approval by the separation authority.

6.  The same regulation states, in effect, that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry-level status.  For Regular Army Soldiers, entry-level status is the first 180 days of continuous AD or the first 180 days of continuous AD following a break of more than 92 days of active military service.  A Soldier being separated under chapter 5-11 will be awarded a character of service of uncharacterized if in an entry-level status. 

7.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) prescribes eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment and includes a list of armed forces RE codes including RA RE codes.  RE code 3 applies to persons separated from their last period of service with a waivable disqualification.  That regulation further provides that RE codes may only be changed if they are determined to be administratively incorrect.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  The SPD code of JFW applies to Soldiers who failed medical/physical procurement standards.  

9.  The SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table states that when the SPD code is JFW the RE code of 3 will be assigned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that his RE code 3 be changed so that he may enlist in the Army.

2.  Although the applicant provides medical documents that indicate he is now medically cleared to reenter the military, he has provided no evidence to show that an RE code of 3, which established his ineligibility for enlistment/reenlistment without a waiver, was in error or unjust at the time of separation.

3.  There is no apparent basis for removal or waiver of the applicant’s disqualification that established the basis for the RE code of 3.  The applicant’s desire to continue in the service to his country was considered; however, there are no provisions authorizing the change of an RE code for this purpose.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION









BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013470



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013470



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003244

    Original file (AR20130003244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to honorable and a change to the RE code. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022031

    Original file (20110022031.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 June 2010, the applicant's unit commander recommended the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11, for a medical condition that existed prior to service (chronic thoracic spine pain with severe thoracic scoliosis with concavity to the left). A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the Soldier’s initial entrance on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021548

    Original file (20130021548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at the time of enlistment, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130010895

    Original file (AR20130010895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A counseling statement, dated 11 September 2012, for failing to meet procurement medical fitness standards and that the medical condition existed prior to service. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier’s initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006972

    Original file (20130006972.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When an x-ray revealed he had 6 lumbar vertebra (one extra), the military doctors assumed this congenital condition caused damage to the disk between L5 and L6; b. separation was not processed in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement or Separation) despite the requirements of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), “Chapter C,” section III, paragraph 5-11 (Existed Prior to Service (EPTS)); c. was not advised that he had the right to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013760

    Original file (20140013760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records as follows: * change the characterization of his discharge to honorable * change the separation program designator (SPD) code from "JFW" * reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from "3" to "1" * correct his service medical records to show his injury in August 2012 while on active duty was a service-connected injury instead of existing prior to service (EPTS) * change the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) proceedings,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010136

    Original file (20100010136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 August 2008, the applicant concurred with the EPSBD Proceedings in Item 21 (Action by Service Member) of the DA Form 4707 and requested to be discharged from the Army without delay. This portion of the EPSBD Proceedings also provided the applicant the opportunity to concur with the proceedings and request retention on active duty; to disagree with the proceedings because his condition did not exist prior to service; or to disagree with the proceedings because his condition was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015302

    Original file (20090015302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code JFW is failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards and the regulatory authority is Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020301

    Original file (20120020301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was discharged due to having a LASIK procedure within the 6-month period prior to his entry on active duty. It also shows that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant contends his RE code of "3" should be changed because he had successful LASIK eye surgery, his vision is now 20/15, and he would like to reenter military service.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006049

    Original file (AR20130006049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 February 1999, the separation authority approved the separation action and directed the applicant’s discharge with service uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the...