Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013024
Original file (20090013024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  10 December 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013024 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded during combat operations while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  

3.  The applicant provides abstracts of a Department of Veterans Affairs Evaluation Report and a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 7 April 1968, in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s records show that he served in the Regular Army from 5 June 1964 to 18 April 1965 and he was credited with completing 10 months and 
14 days of active service.  

3.  The applicant was honorably discharged to accept a commission and reported for active duty as an officer on 19 April 1965.  He was honorably relieved from active duty in the rank of captain and transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) on 7 April 1968.  On the date he was released from active duty he had completed 2 years, 11 months, and 9 days of net active service this period and a total of 3 years, 10 months and 3 days of active military service.

4.  The applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 15 August 1965 through 18 July 1966.  He served in Korea from 15 February 1967 until 3 April 1968.

5.  Item 24, (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart.

6.  Item 21 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant’s DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) also does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.

7.  There are no orders in the applicant’s military personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart.

8.  The applicant’s name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty list.

9.  There is no medical documentation in the applicant's military records to show any injury or treatment he may have received based on a wound he may have received while involved in combat with enemy forces.
 
10.   Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  To be awarded the Purple Heart, substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that a wound was received as a result of enemy action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
2.  The applicant did not provide any documentation to verify that he was wounded while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  

3.  Item 21 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant’s DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) also does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.

4.  There are no orders in the applicant’s military personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty list.

5.  There is no medical documentation in the applicant's military records to show any injury or treatment for a wound he may have received while involved in combat with enemy forces.

6.  Based on the preponderance of the evidence of record, the applicant has not established a basis for award of the Purple Heart or to have it added to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013024



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013024



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013919

    Original file (20130013919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence showing he sustained any injuries or that he was treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. In the applicant's capacity as a medical services officer performing personnel officer duties at two hospitals, he should have been fully aware of the requirements for documenting all medical treatment, particularly for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action, as well as the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028303

    Original file (20100028303.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. Item 21 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 66 shows General Orders Number 9091, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, dated 25 April 1968, awarded him the Purple Heart. His DA Form 66 shows Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, General Orders Number 9091, awarded him the Purple Heart on 25 April 1968; however, the official awards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020619

    Original file (20140020619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster and his complete service medical records are also not available for review with this case. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to show he sustained a wound/injury as a result of enemy action, received treatment, and that treatment was made a matter of official record for award of the Purple Heart during his period of service in Vietnam. _____________X__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005988

    Original file (20070005988.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time when the service member was discharged, required that throughout a qualifying period of service for award of the Good Conduct Medal the enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial. The applicant's records show that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017222

    Original file (20090017222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 April 1965 for a period of 3 years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the: * Purple Heart for wounds received on 1 July 1966 in the Republic of Vietnam * Army Good Conduct Medal for the period of service from 7 April 1965 to 5 April 1968 2. The Board also recommends all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017720

    Original file (20130017720.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was wounded in action on 27 May 1968 and it appears he has been awarded the Purple Heart. General orders awarded him the Army Commendation Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period 7 September 1965 through 16 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006922

    Original file (20140006922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and was wounded on his left foot, on 2 May 1968, by shrapnel from an incoming mortar and the medical treatment is recorded in his medical records. A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. In order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish the wound for which the award is being made required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004637C070206

    Original file (20050004637C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided evidence that shows his injury was a result of hostile action. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative errors which do not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013248

    Original file (20140013248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states other Soldiers have been awarded the Purple Heart for less than his injury. The applicant's medical records were not available for review nor is there any indication the applicant petitioned for award of the Purple Heart while still assigned in the Republic of Vietnam, after his return to the United States, or at any time prior to his retirement. It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004350

    Original file (20110004350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was commissioned an artillery officer on 5 March 1968 and entered active duty on that date. b. the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his 1969 DD Form 214 and adding the Bronze Star Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, Republic of...