Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013006
Original file (20090013006.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013006 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  The applicant states that he earned and deserved the badge.  He also states that he was awarded the badge, but the orders never made it to the States.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Records available to the Board indicate the applicant was inducted and entered active duty on 17 February 1971.  He was trained in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11F (infantry operations and intelligence specialist).

3.  Upon completion of training, in January 1972 the applicant was assigned to Vietnam.  He initially performed duties as a squad leader in duty MOS 11B with the 12th Cavalry and in January 1972 was assigned duties in his primary MOS 11F.

4.  In August 1972 the applicant departed Vietnam and was assigned to Fort Bliss, Texas.  On 16 February 1973 the applicant was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service.  There is no indication in available records that he was ever recommended for or awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

6.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, stated that permanent awards of badges, except basic marksmanship qualification badges and identification badges, would be announced in special orders by commanders authorized to make the award.  Today, Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that such badges will be announced in permanent orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant held an infantry specialty and served in an infantry unit while stationed in the Republic of Vietnam, in the absence of evidence confirming the applicant participated in active ground combat with his infantry unit or orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge, there is no basis for correcting his record to reflect this award.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

4.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013006



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013006



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014811

    Original file (20090014811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. However, there is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he was an active participant in ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit. In the absence of evidence that he actively...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010991

    Original file (20110010991.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in his military personnel records jacket (MPRJ) awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014499

    Original file (20100014499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * He was never awarded MOS 76P2O (stock control and accounting specialist) and he only served in MOS 11B * He never went to advanced individual training (AIT) * His duty MOS was 11B in Vietnam and Germany * He reenlisted as an 11D (armor reconnaissance specialist), but he never got the MOS * The Combat Infantryman Badge was supposed to be on his discharge document * He would have stayed in the service and retired but the Army wouldn't give him MOS 11D, so he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013014

    Original file (20130013014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. However, there is no evidence of record and he did not provide sufficient evidence showing he served in active ground combat while assigned/attached to this infantry unit during his period of service in Vietnam or that he held an infantry MOS. Based on the available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018144

    Original file (20080018144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant's infantry MOS and/or his assignment to an infantry unit during its service in the Republic of Vietnam are not in question. However, there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he was an active participant in combat while assigned to his infantry unit. In the absence of evidence that he actively participated in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007799

    Original file (20100007799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show the Combat Infantryman Badge as an authorized award. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018799

    Original file (20110018799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Expert Infantryman Badge * Combat Infantryman Badge (3rd Award) 2. Additionally, there is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he had satisfactorily held an infantry or special forces MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007147

    Original file (20100007147.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In support of his claim, the applicant provided a letter, dated 27 October 2009, from the Military Awards Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, which states, in pertinent part, based on the documentation he provided with his request for the Combat Infantryman Badge that office verified he was an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003575

    Original file (20120003575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * His CIB is not present on his DD Form 214 * His personnel file proves where he was and what he did in Vietnam 3. The applicant provides: * Service personnel records * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 April 1976 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025852

    Original file (20100025852.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records by awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge and showing it on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant states he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and was in combat.