Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011950
Original file (20090011950.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  7 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011950 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his rank on his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders be changed to specialist instead of private first class.

2.  The applicant states that he was discharged from the USAR Control Group with an incorrect rank.  He contends that his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to specialist is 5 May 1994.  He also points out that the Automated Orders and Resource System Discharge Order History incorrectly shows his grade as private first class but his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) properly shows his rank as specialist and pay grade as E-4.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his USAR discharge orders, an NGB Form 22, an Automated Orders and Resource System Discharge Order History, and a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 4 September 1985 for a period of 8 years.  He enlisted in the Maryland Army National Guard on 19 February 1987.  He was honorably discharged on 18 February 1990 and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training).  He again enlisted in the Maryland Army National Guard on 1 April 1993 for a period of 3 years.

3.  A DA Form 4187, dated 4 May 1994, shows the applicant was advanced to the rank of specialist effective 4 May 1994.

4.  On 1 February 1995, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Maryland Army National Guard in the rank of specialist and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

5.  The applicant's NGB Form 22 for the period ending 1 February 1995 shows his rank is specialist, his pay grade is E-4, and his DOR is 4 May 1994.  His discharge orders from the Army National Guard, dated 5 January 1995, show his rank as specialist.

6.  USAR Personnel Center Orders D-06-654122, dated 25 June 1996, show the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of private first class.

7.  Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was appointed as a specialist effective 4 May 1994.

8.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was reduced in rank prior to his discharge from the USAR.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows the applicant was advanced to specialist effective 4 May 1994 and there is no evidence of record which shows he was reduced in rank prior to his discharge from the USAR on 25 June 1996.  Therefore, the DA Form 4187 which shows the applicant was advanced to specialist on 4 May 1994, the entry in item 8 on his DA Form 2-1 which shows he was appointed specialist on 4 May 1994, and his NGB Form 22 which shows his rank as specialist and DOR is 4 May 1994 are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend his USAR discharge orders to show his rank as specialist.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending USAR Personnel Center Orders D-06-654122, dated 25 June 1996, to show the applicant's rank as specialist; and 

	b.  issuing to the applicant an Honorable Discharge Certificate from the USAR, dated 25 June 1996, which shows his rank as specialist.



      ____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011950



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011950



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007821

    Original file (20070007821.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The 343rd Combat Support Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, Report of Promotion Board Proceedings for Promotion to SGT/E-5 and SSG/E-6, dated 5 October 1995. c. Department of the Army, Headquarters, 77th RSC, Fort Totten, New York, Promotion Orders Number 72-2, to SGT/E5, dated 5 March 1996. d. DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 11 June 1996, request for correction of DOR, together with the commander's endorsement, dated 18 July 1996, and the 77th RSC response, dated 13 September 1996. There...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016364

    Original file (20140016364.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) in 1994 but he became ill prior to attending basic training and could not go at the time directed * when he became physically able to go on active duty he did and completed training in 1996 * he should have received an honorable characterization of service not uncharacterized service * much of the information, including the rank/pay grade, utilized for the completion of his separation documents was from another Soldier's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013158

    Original file (20080013158.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: ARNG Current Annual Statement, dated 2 November 2005; National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), effective 1 June 1998; Office of the Adjutant General of Virginia (OTAG) Orders 132-043, dated 12 May 1998; 1995 SSG Promotion List, dated 11 February 1996; Headquarters, 80th Division (Institutional Training) Orders 135-18, dated 30 November 1994; 229th Engineer Battalion, 29th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020317

    Original file (20090020317.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he was appointed as a 1LT, Chaplain Corps, with a DOR of 25 August 1994. Once he is appointed in the USAR in the correct grade, USAHRC officials should determine the earliest dates he would have qualified for consideration for promotion to MAJ and LTC and, if necessary, have his records be considered for promotion by a special selection board to MAJ and LTC, under the appropriate year(s) criteria, as soon as he became eligible for such promotions based on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013721

    Original file (20090013721.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Also on the same date, by letter, HRC-St. Louis notified him that he was promoted as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army to LTC with an effective date of 11 January 2005 and a DOR of 15 April 2004. e. In the applicant's application, he submitted a letter from MG (Retired) V-----, who served as TAG of the State of Massachusetts at the time the applicant was appointed to MAJ in the MAARNG, dated 1 March 2010. Army Regulation 135-155 provides policy for the selection and promotion of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000889C070206

    Original file (20050000889C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DOR should be 31 October 1984, that his total prior Reserve service should be 10 years, that his total service for pay should be 17 years, that his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) and date awarded should be "95B20" 9 May 1972, that his highest level of education is 2 years college, Associate of Arts Degree, and that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) with one bronze service star. The evidence shows that the applicant served...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000889C070206

    Original file (20050000889C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DOR should be 31 October 1984, that his total prior Reserve service should be 10 years, that his total service for pay should be 17 years, that his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) and date awarded should be "95B20" 9 May 1972, that his highest level of education is 2 years college, Associate of Arts Degree, and that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) with one bronze service star. The evidence shows that the applicant served...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017566

    Original file (20130017566.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his current DOR for CPT is recorded on his Officer Record Brief (ORB) as 3 November 1995. On 7 November 1995, the FLARNG published Orders P311-006 promoting him from 1LT to CPT effective 3 November 1995. His DOR to CPT is correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004612

    Original file (20090004612.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s request for reinstatement as an officer in the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) was considered and denied by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 4 May 2006. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant met with The Adjutant General to discuss his discharge and that The Adjutant General allowed him to later enlist as an enlisted Soldier. The evidence of records further shows that, while in the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement), the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015532

    Original file (20080015532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that when he separated from the Regular Army in June 2005, he was a promotable first lieutenant who had been selected for promotion to the rank of captain with a sequence number of "3." The applicant provides a partial copy of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Captain Army Competitive Category Promotion Selection List; a memorandum from the National Guard Bureau regarding the promotion process for Department of the Army Select Officers; his automated personnel qualification...