IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 10 November 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090011837
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he has a 100-percent service-connected disability.
2. The applicant states that he received a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) rating decision, dated 27 April 2009, that awarded him a 100-percent service-connected disability.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DVA rating decision, dated 27 April 2009, in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 14 February 1963. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 97B (Military Intelligence Specialist). The highest rank he attained during this period of military service was sergeant.
3. The applicants records also show he was honorably released from active duty on 11 February 1966 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of expiration of his term of service (ETS) and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) for completion of his Reserve obligation. He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 28 days of creditable active service.
4. There is no indication in the applicants records that he suffered an injury or an illness during his military service that limited his ability to perform in his specialty and/or grade or that would have warranted his entry into the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES).
5. There is no indication in the applicant's records that he completed any other period of active duty subsequent to his ETS.
6. The applicant submitted a copy of his DVA rating decision, dated 27 April 2009, which shows he was awarded service-connected disability for lateral sclerosis and left and right neurological impairments.
7. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. The regulation directs, in pertinent part, that the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of military service. It is important that information entered on this form should be complete and accurate. Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214. Chapter 2 states, in pertinent part, that item 12 shows the record of service. Extreme care is used when completing this item since post-service benefits, final pay, retirement credit, and so forth are based on this information. Item 32 (Remarks) is used for Headquarters, Department of the Army mandatory requirements, when a separate block is not available, and/or as a continuation entry.
8. Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 1110 and 1131, permit the DVA to award compensation for disabilities which were incurred in or aggravated by active military service. However, an award of a DVA rating does not establish error or injustice in the separation document. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. The Army disability rating is to compensate the individual for the loss of a military career. The DVA does not have authority or responsibility for determining physical fitness for military service. The DVA awards disability ratings to veterans for service-connected conditions, including those conditions detected after discharge, to compensate the individual for loss of civilian employability. As a result, these two Government agencies, operating under different policies, may arrive at a different disability rating based on the same impairment. Unlike the Army, the DVA can evaluate a veteran throughout his or her lifetime, adjusting the percentage of disability based upon that agency's examinations and findings.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was awarded a 100-percent service-connected disability.
2. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted on 14 February 1963 and was honorably separated on 11 February 1966 by reason of ETS. His DD Form 214 captures his period of active service and the reason for his separation. There is neither an error nor an injustice.
3. The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldiers most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. There is no provision in the applicable regulation to list a service-connected disability rating by the DVA on the DD Form 214.
4. An award of a rating by another agency does not establish error in the applicants separation document. Operating under different laws and their own policies, the DVA does not have the authority or the responsibility for determining medical unfitness for military service or the reason for separating a Soldier. The DVA may award ratings because of a medical condition related to service (service-connected) and affects the individual's civilian employability. A disability rating assigned by the Army is based on the level of disability at the time of the Soldiers separation and can only be accomplished through the PDES. There is no evidence in the applicants case that he suffered from an injury or illness that would have warranted his entry into the PDES.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant relief in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ __X_____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
____________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090011837
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090011837
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007933
The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was medically discharged instead of honorably discharged. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009781
The applicant states, in effect, that he is currently rated as 80-percent disabled as the result of DVA rating decisions based upon his medical condition. It is a fact-finding board for the following: a. investigating the nature, cause, degree of severity, and probable permanency of the disability of Soldiers whose cases are referred to the board; b. evaluating the physical condition of the Soldier against the physical requirements of the Soldier's particular office, grade, rank, or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008169
The applicant was rated under the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) codes 5099 and 5003 (chronic right knee pain) and was granted a 10-percent disability rating. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before he or she can be medically retired or separated. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006307
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically retired or separated for disability with entitlement to severance pay instead of honorably discharged. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army PDES and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014470
Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army PDES and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. Once a determination of physical unfitness is made, the PEB rates all disabilities using the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The Army rates only conditions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019911
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he received a permanent medical retirement instead of being honorably released from active duty on 24 November 2008. The PAARNG Medical Detachment memorandum, dated 11 March 2009, subject: Medical Statement on National Guard Bureau (NGB) 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) Concerning Unresolved Medical Issues, shows personnel responsible for the applicant's separation documents were directed to include the following...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017724
Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), establishes the Army physical disability evaluation system and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014300
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he received a medical discharge instead of an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army PDES and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. The DVA...
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2004-124
§ 1201 provides that a member who is found to be “unfit to per- form the duties of the member’s office, grade, rank, or rating because of physical dis- ability incurred while entitled to basic pay” may be retired if the disability is (1) perma- nent and stable, (2) not a result of misconduct, and (3) for members with less than 20 years of service, “at least 30 percent under the standard schedule of rating disabilities in use by the Department of Veterans Affairs at the time of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019068
The advisory official recommended no change in the applicants military records as the applicant did not provide an evidence of error by the PEB. Army Regulation 635-40 establishes the Army physical disability evaluation system and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating. The Army rates only conditions determined to be...