Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011807
Original file (20090011807.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011807


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests he be allowed to enroll in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and designate his mother as beneficiary.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he never had the opportunity to make a RCSBP election naming his mother as the beneficiary.  He states the Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO (HRC-STL) did not change his address as it should have, so he did not receive the necessary forms in time.  The applicant states "the address system" will not accept "COND" (for Condado) in his address, only "URB" (for Urbanizacion) for Puerto Rico.

3.  The applicant provides a piece of paper from the Clinica Las Americas Guaynabo.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant is a retired US Army Reserve (USAR) Soldier residing in Puerto Rico.  He was born on 16 March 1958 and he will turn 60 on 16 March 2018.  He served in the Regular Army and the USAR commencing on 21 May 1979 and ending on 11 February 2002 with his transfer to the USAR (Retired Reserve).

3.  The applicant was notified of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 in a memorandum, dated 11 July 2001 (the 20-Year Letter).  The memorandum was mailed to J6 Calle 8, Bayamon, Puerto Rico 00957-4331.  That memorandum states in paragraph 4:

"You are entitled to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RC-SBP) established by Public Law 95-397….  By law, you have only 90 calendar days from the date you receive this memo to submit your DD Form 1883, Survivor Benefit Plan – Election Certificate.  If you do not submit your election plan within 90 calendar days, you will not be entitled to survivor benefit coverage until you apply for retired pay at age 60.  If you do not elect coverage and should die before age 60, your survivors will not be entitled to benefits."

4.  The applicant's Total Army Personnel Data Base (TAPDB) transaction history contains an entry showing that his 20-Year Letter was mailed to his J6 Calle 8, Bayamon, Puerto Rico 00957-4331 address.  On 22 March 2002, the applicant updated his address, again showing J6 Calle 8, Bayamon, Puerto Rico
00957-4331 as his correct address.  This address does not appear to change until the applicant submitted his 25 June 2009 application to this Board.  In his application to the Board, he listed his address "Cond. Brisas de Panorama, Apt XXX, Bayamon, PR  00957."

5.  On 30 September 1978, Public Law 95-397 established the RCSBP in order to allow Reserve Component members to purchase the same protection afforded Active Component members since 21 September 1972 with the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).  RCSBP allows a retirement-eligible Reserve Soldier to elect to receive reduced retired pay during the Soldiers lifetime in order to provide a continuation of a portion of the retired pay to a survivor upon death.  Along with the 20-Year Letter, the Soldier will be sent RCSBP information and instructions for enrolling in the program by completing an RCSBP election form, DD Form 1883. 

6.  The DD Form 1883 must be completed; signed by the Soldier and, if applicable, the Soldier's spouse; witnessed by a disinterested person; and returned to the HRC-STL within 90 days of receipt.

7.  RCSBP elections must be made within 90 days after receiving the retirement packet (20-Year Letter).   Since 1 January 2001, by law, married members must provide written spouse concurrence in order to elect less-than-maximum RCSBP participation (i.e., other than Option C, full base amount, spouse or spouse and children).  Failure to do so will result in “automatic” spouse coverage, Option C, full base amount, for which premiums will begin to be owed at age 60.   Prior to 1 January 2001, failure to make any or a proper RCSBP election “defaulted” to no coverage, by law.  This law change was enacted to bring the RC plan (RCSBP) elections into line with the AC plan (SBP) elections, which have required spouse concurrence since 1 March 1986.  Options include:

	a.  Option A:  Defer or decline to make an SBP election until the Soldier begins drawing retired pay at 60.  (NOTE: If this option is chosen, spouse concurrence is required.  If the Soldier dies before 60, no annuity is payable to survivors.  Under this option, if the Soldier lives until 60, Soldier will be given an opportunity at that time to elect standard SBP).

	b.  Option B:  Provide an annuity beginning on the Soldier's 60th birthday (if he/she dies before 60), or upon death (if age 60 or older at death).

	c.  Option C:  Provide an annuity beginning on the day after death, regardless of the Soldier's age at death.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant wants to elect RCSBP Option C naming his mother the beneficiary retroactive to a date within 90 days of receipt of his 11 July 2001 
20-Year Letter.

2.  The applicant alleges he did not receive his RCSBP paperwork due to an incorrect address on file at the HRC-STL.  This argument does not appear to be a valid one.  The applicant obviously received his 20-Year Letter because he chose transfer to the Retired Reserve some 6 months later.  Therefore, it stands to reason he received his RCSBP paperwork, but did not respond.

3.  The applicant has missed his opportunity to elect RCSBP Option C with his mother as the beneficiary.  However, when he makes application for retired pay in late 2017 or early 2018, he can sign up for SBP and list his mother as his beneficiary at that time.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011807



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011807



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004331C070205

    Original file (20060004331C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The FSM's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20- year letter) is dated 7 February 1995. Records at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command - St. Louis indicate that the FSM's records did not contain a DD Form 1883.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011212

    Original file (20130011212.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for Reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 (and eligible to participate in SBP), to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the FSM be corrected by showing he submitted his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082983C070215

    Original file (2002082983C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Retirements and Annuities Section, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) informed the Board Analyst that the applicant applied for the RCSBP annuity but she was denied because they had no record that the FSM ever enrolled in RCSBP. The Board considered the applicant’s request that the records of her deceased spouse be corrected to show he enrolled in the (RCSBP). A DD Form 1883, on file in his military personnel records, shows that he elected to enroll in the RCSBP for full...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002452

    Original file (20090002452.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records contain a DD Form 93 (Record of Emergency Data) which shows he had dependent children at the time he received his twenty-year letter and made no election on their behalf. The applicant provided the first two pages of a DD Form 2656-5, indicating the FSM's intentions would have been to elect to participate in the RCSBP with spouse and child coverage based on full retired pay and immediate annuity coverage at his death. The date stamp also shows that the DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008240

    Original file (20090008240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record or independent evidence which indicates the FSM ever completed a DD Form 1883 or a DD Form 2656 (SBP Election Change Certificate) electing to enroll in the RCSBP and/or that he elected "spouse only" coverage. Under the law in effect at the time, a member was required to make the RCSBP election within 90 days of receiving the 20-year letter or wait until he or she applied for retired pay at age 60 and elect to participate in the standard SBP. If he failed to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017403

    Original file (20110017403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The case corrected the military records of an FSM to show the applicant (the FSM's spouse) was entitled to an RCSBP annuity effective the date following the FSM's death. There was no evidence the FSM completed a DD Form 1883 or that the spouse was informed the FSM could participate in the RCSBP. The evidence of record shows the FSM received his Twenty-Year Letter with the accompanying SBP forms in June 2000. a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011157

    Original file (20070011157.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her husband's records, a former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that he elected to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "Natural person with insurable interest-mother" to "Spouse only" coverage upon marriage. The applicant provided the following documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 1883, dated 19 July 1994; b. DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014920

    Original file (20110014920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication in the FSM's service records that she made an election within 90 days of receiving her 20-year letter to enroll in the RCSBP. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement and participation in SBP, but were not yet age 60, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The FSM's records do not indicate that she elected to participate in the RCSBP and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016016

    Original file (20110016016.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The divorce decree ordered him to pay child support for their permanently disabled child born on 1 November 1970. The evidence of record shows upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the applicant executed a DD Form 1883 on 21 April 1997, electing "spouse only" coverage under option C (immediate coverage). With respect to his request to change his SBP election from "spouse only" to "child only," once a member elects option C coverage, they cannot change options.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013725C070206

    Original file (20050013725C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. ...