Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011773
Original file (20090011773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011773 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show her eligibility for a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity based on the FSM's death.  

2.  The applicant states although divorced, she and the FSM reconciled and planned to remarry.  She claims to have discussed military retirement several times while getting his final affairs in order.  During these discussions, the FSM indicated she was listed as his beneficiary on his retirement and he believed as long as he did not change the information, the benefits would go to her.  She claims the FSM had total faith his wishes would be carried out and believed the Army would follow through with taking care of her.  

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of the application:  

* FSM's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 9 May 1991
* DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate), dated 4 January 1992
* DD Form 2656-7 (Verification for Survivor Annuity), dated 5 September 2008
* Marriage Certificate
* FSM's Death Certificate
* Divorce Degree, dated 7 November 2001
* W-4P (Withholding Certificate for Pension or Annuity Payments), dated 9 May 2009
* FSM's Last Will and Testament, dated 31 August 2007
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM's record shows he served in the Regular Army from 28 January 1971 through 29 October 1972.  On 30 October 1972, he enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG).  

2.  On 18 September 1987, he married the applicant. 

3.  On 6 December 1991, a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 was prepared for the FSM by the Nebraska ARNG.  It informed the FSM he completed the required years of service necessary to qualify for retired pay at age 60.  

4.  On 4 January 1992, the FSM completed a DD Form 1883 in which he elected full "Spouse Only" SBP coverage under Option C (Immediate Coverage).  The applicant was named as his spouse in item 10 (name of spouse) of the form. 

5.  On 31 May 1992, the FSM was honorably discharged from the ARNG and transferred to the Retired Reserve.  

6.  On 7 November 2001, the FSM and applicant were divorced in the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska.  The divorce degree indicates the FSM and applicant entered into a property settlement agreement that was approved by the court in full and made a part of the divorce decree.

7.  The property settlement agreement stipulates the FSM and applicant would have as their sole and separate property all of the following solely in their own name, free and clear of any claim by the other: 

* Personal Effects
* Accounts and Investments in his name only
* Household Goods and Furnishings
* Life Insurance
* Individual Retirement Accounts, Annuities, Pensions, Profit Sharing Plans, 401(k) Retirement Accounts, All Deferred Compensation Plans and Qualified Plans
* Motor Vehicles, Recreation Vehicles, Boars, Aircraft
* Claims and Suits
* Other Personal Property

8.  The divorce decree and property settlement agreement fail to identify the FSM's SBP as a separate matter and both the applicant and FSM waived and relinquished any and all interests or rights of any kind not covered in the agreement.   

9.  The record is void of any change of SBP election made by the FSM subsequent to his 2001 divorce from the applicant. 

10.  On 3 November 2007, the FSM died at the age of 56.  The death certificate shows his marital status as divorced.

11.  The applicant provides a last will and testament completed by the FSM on 31 August 2007.  It stipulates if the applicant survived him, he bequeathed her all of his interest in the following:

* Household furniture and furnishings
* Automobiles
* Books
* Paintings
* Jewelry
* Watches
* Silverware
* China
* Wearing apparel
* Family stores
* All other articles of household or personal use, and other tangible personal property encompassed by Nebraska law

The will makes no mention of SBP entitlement.

12.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3), incorporates the provisions of the Uniformed Services Former Spouse Protection Act relating to SBP.  It permits a person who is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse incident to a proceeding of divorce to make such an election.  If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within 1 year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

13.  When SBP is court-ordered, the former spouse may make a deemed election within 1 year of the divorce.  When SBP is not court-ordered, the retiree may make a written request to change spouse coverage to former spouse coverage voluntarily.  Otherwise, participation remains in a suspended status until the retiree gains another spouse, who will become the beneficiary after completing 1 year of marriage unless the retiree desires not to resume spouse coverage, which is an option.  There are no provisions allowing the former spouse to request a deemed election when SBP is not court-ordered.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention she should receive an SBP annuity based on the death of the FSM was carefully considered.  However, the evidence does not support this claim. 

2.  By law, when SBP is not court-ordered, the retiree may make a written request to change spouse coverage to former spouse coverage voluntarily.  Otherwise, participation remains in a suspended status until the retiree gains another spouse.  There are no provisions allowing the former spouse to request a deemed election when SBP is not court-ordered.

3.  The evidence in this case shows the FSM elected coverage for the applicant as his spouse upon his retirement in 1992.  However, it fails to show he elected to cover her as a former spouse after their 2001 divorce.  

4.  Further, the divorce decree and accompanying property settlement agreement fail to identify entitlement to SBP coverage for the applicant as a former spouse.  In addition, the FSM's last will and testament fails to identify SBP as a bequeathed item and is in any extent not the proper mechanism with which to establish SBP coverage.  Absent any independent evidence of the FSM's intent to provide SBP coverage to the applicant as a spouse or former spouse, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011773



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011773



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012446

    Original file (20110012446.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: * the FSM's discharge document * their divorce decree * the applicant's Personnel Qualification Record * four Retiree Account Statements * the FSM's Certificate of Death * the FSM's Last Will and Testament CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) shows the FSM elected spouse only SBP coverage based on a reduced amount of retired pay ($434.00). The applicant and FSM divorced on 17 March 2005. a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015292C071029

    Original file (20060015292C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 21 May 2001, the FSM and the applicant divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. He and the applicant divorced in May 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019282

    Original file (20130019282.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired, and now deceased, former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity. On 13 December 2012, by letter, DFAS officials notified the applicant that in order for a former spouse to be eligible for an SBP the member would have to request in writing to change the SBP election from spouse to former spouse, or the divorce decree...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019417

    Original file (20140019417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. On 25 March 1987, the FSM and applicant were divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022968

    Original file (20100022968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she is the beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members. However, there was no such court order to maintain the applicant as the FSM's beneficiary as his "former spouse" on his SBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064691C070421

    Original file (2001064691C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The applicant states, through counsel, that the FSM and the applicant were granted a divorce on 16 November 1995. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010076

    Original file (20080010076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the FSM, while still married to the applicant, elected SBP spouse coverage at a reduced amount, prior to his retirement. After retirement, he and the applicant were divorced. Their divorce decree did not obligate the FSM to change SBP coverage from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage; nevertheless, he continued to pay SBP premiums after the divorce and until his death, a period of nearly 5 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060008070C071029

    Original file (AR20060008070C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage and that she be awarded the SBP annuity retroactive to the date of his death. However, the evidence of record fails to show that the FSM ever changed his SBP election from spouse to former spouse. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009446C070208

    Original file (20040009446C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election made by her deceased ex-spouse, a former service member (FSM), be changed to former spouse coverage. The available records fail to show that either the FSM or the applicant took any action to request a change to the FSM’s SBP election to former spouse coverage within a year of the divorce decree being issued, as is required by law. The record shows that the FSM failed to make a former spouse coverage SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011503

    Original file (20140011503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show she is the eligible beneficiary to receive a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity as a former spouse. Although the applicant's DOB is shown in the SBP section of the FSM's Retiree Account Statement, there is no evidence of record that shows the FSM changed his SBP category from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage. There is also no evidence that the applicant notified DFAS in...