Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011458
Original file (20090011458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011458 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Medical Badge.

2.  The applicant states he believes his actions merited award of the Combat Medical Badge but his company commander did not recommend him for the award.  He further states that his commanders, thereafter, were hesitant to make the recommendation due to the lapse of time.  He indicates he is an Army Medical Department (AMEDD) officer who was assigned to an Infantry Brigade in a combat situation and was part of the company's base response unit as a first responder.  He states that he medically treated and controlled the injured Soldier and was within close proximity to the attack.  He states that he “believes he was not considered as carefully because he is not a 68W or provider.” 

3.  The applicant provides two DA Forms 2823 (Sworn Statement) in support of this application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he was appointed a Regular Army Medical Service Corps officer on 20 May 2006 and promoted to captain on 1 June 2009. 

2.  The applicant's Officer Record Brief shows he served in Iraq from approximately November 2007 to November 2008.

3.  The applicant provided two sworn statements, both dated 3 July 2008.  In one, Staff Sergeant F******** stated that on 28 June 2008, security forces came under direct precision small arms fire resulting in one U.S. Soldier being wounded in action (WIA) by a gunshot to the right leg.  He indicates the applicant was under the threat of direct enemy fire while assessing the wounded Soldier's injuries.  After assessing the injuries, the applicant instructed the casualty to apply direct pressure and ordered the transportation of the casualty to Ghaz 1 Aid Station.  He indicates the applicant, in effect, continued to monitor the wounded Soldier after arrival at the aid station.  In the second sworn statement Staff Sergeant W*** stated that security forces began receiving precision small arms fire resulting in one U.S. Soldier being WIA from a gunshot to the right thigh.  He states that the applicant was no more than 100 meters from the point of engagement and was under the continuing and present threat of enemy sniper fire when he helped medically evaluate the casualty.  He states the applicant continued to treat the wounded Soldier.

4.  Paragraph 8-7 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that on or after 18 September 2001, medical personnel assigned or attached to or under operational control of any ground Combat Arms unit (not to include members assigned or attached to Aviation units) of brigade or smaller size, who satisfactorily performed medical duties while the unit is engaged in active ground combat, provided they are personally present and under fire, are eligible for award of the Combat Medical Badge.  However, retroactive awards under these criteria are not authorized for service prior to 18 September 2001.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant believes his actions merit award of the Combat Medical Badge, his commanders did not see fit to forward his recommendation for consideration.

2.  The regulatory guidance is that medical personnel must have satisfactorily performed medical duties while the unit is engaged in active ground combat.  While the sworn statements provided indicate the applicant performed medical duties while under the "threat" of fire, there is no corroborating evidence of enemy fire or other type of engagement during the time he treated the wounded Soldier.  Being present after a Soldier was shot is not sufficient.  As such, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Combat Medical Badge.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X__  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011458



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011458



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007354

    Original file (20140007354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140007354 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The Commander stated that during two 57 millimeter rocket attacks on COS Warrior the applicant immediately moved to the sound of the blasts and treated those wounded by the shrapnel within 1-2 minutes, unknown if still under rocket fire or not, and long before an all clear sounded. The statements indicate he arrived on the scene after the explosions and performed treatment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017518

    Original file (20080017518.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a checklist for submission of request(s) for the Combat Action Badge; a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) for a Soldier, not herself; a Kansas National Guard Medal of Excellence for exceptional meritorious service and valor in combat while serving as a Combat Medic in Operation Iraqi Freedom; State of New York Orders Number 025-044, dated 25 January 2006; State of New York Orders Number 081-197, dated 22 March 2007, amending State of New York Orders Number 025-044, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009132

    Original file (20140009132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. He should be awarded the Combat Medical Badge instead, and his records should be corrected to show this. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * revoking that portion of Permanent Order Number Number 201-56, dated 22 July 2005, Headquarters, 48th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, awarding the applicant the Combat Infantryman Badge * awarding the applicant the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000055

    Original file (20150000055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 August 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150000055 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: * newspaper article, dated 4 May 2003, titled, "The Bridge at Samawah" * two pages from a book titled, Boots on the Ground * previous Record of Proceedings * an unsigned statement indicating he was awarded the Combat Medical Badge CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Medical Badge may be awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019158

    Original file (20110019158.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the: * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision AR20100014362, dated 25 January 2011, denying his request for award of the Purple Heart for wounds received on 24 January 1970 * ABCMR decision AR20110002573, dated 23 August 2011, denying his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded to a member of the Armed Forces of the United States...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008650

    Original file (20080008650.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080008650 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Item 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces), of the applicant’s DD Form 214, shows he received a gunshot wound to the left leg in Wonju, Korea, on 12 February 1951. He stated that his disabilities were the result of wounds received while in combat with the enemy in Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013259

    Original file (20140013259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). The applicant scanned the victim for serious bleeding, ensured he had an open airway, and started treating his wounds.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002500

    Original file (20110002500.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he sustained injuries as a direct result of an MVA caused when his driver swerved to avoid rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) fire from enemy combatants. The medical documentation and sworn statements show he was treated for injuries due to a vehicle accident and not injuries caused by the enemy. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in Balad,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010084

    Original file (20080010084.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 25 January 2004; two DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action); four DA Forms 2823 (Sworn Statement); reassignment orders, dated 7 June 2004; and discharge orders, dated 11 October 2007. The applicant provided a sworn statement from Sergeant M___ that appears to be support for this DA Form 4187. Neither the DA Form 4187 nor Sergeant M___’s statement indicates that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012519

    Original file (20130012519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * his statement of the incident of 29 September 2011 * his statement of the incident of 7 October 2011 * email endorsement from LTC K, dated 4 June 2012 * Commander's Recommended Approval, DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 20 June 2012 * Sworn statements from MAJ FDR, Chief Warrant Officer Two P, Sergeant (SGT) V, SGT F, SGT W, and SGT C * two Officer Evaluation Reports (OER) * Officer Record Brief (ORB) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. When the applicant provided...