Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011407
Original file (20090011407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 December 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011407 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that his time spent in a patient status after termination of his active duty for training (ACDUTRA) was active military service.

2.  The applicant states that he was injured while on ACDUTRA and was held in a patient status until 2 January 1974.  He did not receive a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for his time in a patient status.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract); DD Form 214; two DA Forms 2139 (Military Pay Voucher); Certification of Reserve Duty Pay; two letters from the Fort Devens Medical Department Activity, dated 3 December 1973 and 8 January 1974; discharge orders; DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate); and DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 26 August 1971, the applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve for 6 years.  He entered initial active duty for training (IADT) on 6 October 1971 and subsequently completed both basic combat training and advanced individual training as a clerk typist.  He was released from IADT on 2 February 1972 and transferred to his Reserve unit.

3.  The applicant attended ACDUTRA from 7 to 21 July 1973.  During this period he sustained an injury.

4.  In a letter, dated 3 December 1973, the applicant's Reserve unit was notified by the Fort Devens Medical Department Activity that he had been carried on the rolls of the hospital in a "convalescent patient" status for an injury sustained on 10 July 1973 while on ACDUTRA.  This letter advised the applicant to report to the hospital for evaluation of his medical fitness for military service.

5.  In a letter, dated 8 January 1974, the applicant's Reserve unit was notified by the Fort Devens Medical Department Activity that he was removed from a patient status and returned to duty with a medical profile effective 2 January 1974.  His injury had been determined to have been in the line of duty and the proper authority had continued his pay and allowances through 2 January 1974.  The applicant was ordered to report to the medical treatment facility in April 1974 for further evaluation of his medical profile.

6.  Army Regulation 135-200 (Active Duty for Training of Individual Members), in effect at the time, provided that members who had incurred disease or injury while on ACDUTRA may, with their consent, remain in a patient status after termination of the ACDUTRA indicated in their orders.  ACDUTRA orders would not be amended to extend the ACDUTRA period in such cases except when approved by Headquarters, Department of the Army.  The period after completion of ACDUTRA was not considered to be in an active military status and the individual would not accrue leave or receive active duty retirement point credits during this period.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he should be issued a DD Form 214 for his time in a patient status after his injury while on ACDUTRA.

2.  The governing provisions at the time clearly provided that time served in a patient status did not qualify as active military service.  Therefore, issuance of a DD Form 214 for such service was not authorized.

3.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011407



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011407



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002525

    Original file (20120002525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He had served 6 years and 5 days of active service. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) states, in pertinent part, that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service. Therefore, since there is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000673

    Original file (20080000673.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of Item 21 (Time Lost) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) from 188 days to the correct number of days. He was subsequently authorized 11 days leave effective 19 April 1973. This form further confirms the applicant completed a total of 10 months and 10 days of creditable active military service with 188 days of lost time due to AWOL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100245C070208

    Original file (2004100245C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's medical records indicate that on 12 July 1973, while on active duty for training, he sustained an injury to his shoulder. The commander indicated that the applicant was unable to work and that his record contained copies of 15 Letters of Instruction from the hospital, 15 certificates of injury, a request for active duty orders with 13 endorsements, and other documents...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003313

    Original file (20130003313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the reason for his discharge be changed from "Failure to Report to [Initial Active Duty Training (IADT)] Phase 1 or 2" to "Medical" and that his discharge be reclassified from uncharacterized to "Medical/Honorable." The applicant provides * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * U.S. Army Infantry School Certificate, dated 26 July 2002 * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement),dated 6 September 2002 * four Standard Forms (SF)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106232C070208

    Original file (2004106232C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board. The undated DD Form 95 provided by the applicant states, "(applicant), Your reporting date for 6 Months active duty is, 5 Jul6 1967. The DD Form 95 provided by the applicant is noted; however, the available evidence shows he was released from active duty after only 16 weeks.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008222

    Original file (20120008222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is nothing in multiple typical source documents to confirm he was wounded in action and/or treated for a combat injury/wound: * Item 38 (Record of Assignment) of his DA Form 20 does not show he was in a patient status * Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 does not show a combat wound/injury * Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the PH * His records do not contain GO authorizing him award of the PH * His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026710

    Original file (20100026710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 January 1962, by personnel action, the applicant requested release from active duty, if eligible, based on erroneous order to active duty from the Standby Reserve. There is no evidence he served on active duty between the date he was released from active duty on 20 February 1962 and the date he was ultimately discharged from the USAR on 31 May 1964 upon completion of his military service obligation. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004938

    Original file (20150004938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded for qualifying service in Vietnam. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his DD Form 214, ending on 30 July 1976 the Good Conduct Medal and Vietnam Service Medal * adding to his DD Form 214, ending on 30 July 1976 the: * Army Commendation Medal * Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017103

    Original file (20080017103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show he served in the Regular Army in an active duty status. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 shows his service as active duty for training (ACDUTRA). Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002505

    Original file (20080002505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant completed his involuntary AD and was honorably released from AD and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Standby) on 20 December 1969. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from AD, retirement or discharge. At that time, the "ACDUTRA" entry was made on the DD Form 214 even for USAR Soldiers ordered to involuntary AD for extended periods of time.