Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011334
Original file (20090011334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 December 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011334 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was retired in the rank/grade of first sergeant (1SG)/E-8.

2.  The applicant states that he served as the 1SG of Company B, 399th Regiment, 100th Division (Training), and was awarded the special qualification identifier (SQI) "M" for 1SG.  He was placed on the Retired List in the rank/grade of master sergeant (MSG)/E-8.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant, a career Reservist, was 66 years and 11 months of age and retired in the rank/pay grade of MSG/E-8 at the time of his application.

3.  On 10 May 1982, the applicant was promoted to MSG/E-8.  He held military occupational specialty (MOS) 19Z5M (Armor Senior Sergeant with the 1SG SQI).

4.  During the period 1 December 1984 to 11 March 1986, the applicant served as the 1SG of Company B, 3rd Battalion, 399th Regiment, 100th Division (Training), located in Hopkinsville, Kentucky.

5.  On 12 March 1986, the applicant was assigned for duty as a MSG/E-8 with the 3290th U.S. Army Reserve Forces School located in Nashville, Tennessee.

6.  Orders 24-7, 125th U.S. Army Reserve Command, dated 18 April 1989, withdrew the applicant's primary MOS of 19Z5M and his additional MOS of 75Z5O and awarded him the primary MOS of 75Z5O (Senior Personnel Sergeant) and a secondary MOS of 71L5O (Senior Administrative Sergeant).

7.  The U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center notified the applicant in a letter, dated 22 June 1989, that he had completed the required years of service and had qualified for retired pay upon application at 60 years of age (20-year letter).

8.  Orders 96-2, Headquarters, Second U.S. Army, dated 25 February 1991, transferred the applicant to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired) in the rank/pay grade of MSG/E-8 effective 28 February 1991.

9.  The applicant's DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits) is not contained in the available records.

10.  Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay, Nonregular Service) provides, in pertinent part, that a MSG/E-8 who formerly held the title of 1SG and who wishes to be shown on the Retired List in his/her former title must include the following documents with the DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits):

	a.  a copy of the appointment to 1SG and

	b.  a copy of the release order from 1SG status (service must have been satisfactory and the person not released from that status for cause).



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he should have been placed on the Retired List as a 1SG/E-8.

2.  Records show he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired) effective 28 February 1991 in the rank/grade of MSG/E-8.

3.  The applicant met the qualifications and successfully held and served in the rank/grade of 1SG/E-8.  Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected to show that he requested to be placed on the Retired List in the rank/grade of 1SG/E-8 in conjunction with his request for retired pay and that he submitted the required documents with his DD Form 108.

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing that the applicant properly completed his DD Form 108 indicating he requested to placed on the Retired List in the rank/grade of 1SG/E-8;

	b.  showing that he provided all the required documents in conjunction with his DD Form 108;

	c.  showing that he was retired as a 1SG/E-8; and



	d.  providing the applicant with the appropriate documents/instructions for obtaining a retired identification card showing him to be a 1SG/E-8.



      ____________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011334



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011334



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010988

    Original file (20070010988.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he further served as a tactical noncommissioned officer (NCO) for 21 months at the United States Military Academy (USMA) performing the duties of a 1SG. Additionally, the regulation states, in pertinent part that Item 4 “Grade, Rate, or Rank” of the DD Form 214 will reflect the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation. In view of the above, there is insufficient evidence to change the applicant's grade based on the evidence available in his military personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019211

    Original file (20130019211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Soldier must be serving in and retiring in the grade of MSG. The applicant held the rank of MSG, not 1SG, on his last day of active duty. His DD Form 214 correctly reflects the rank and grade he held at the time of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010531

    Original file (20070010531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his retired rank of master sergeant (MSG) be changed to first sergeant (1SG) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Additionally, the regulation states, in pertinent part, that Item 4 "Grade, Rate, or Rank" of the DD Form 214 will reflect the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation. Evidence of record shows that the applicant’s grade, at the time of his separation, was MSG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016311

    Original file (20100016311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records contain no evidence to show he was selected for promotion to pay grade E-9. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states that an MSG who formerly held the title of 1SG and who wishes to be shown on the Army of the United States (AUS) Retired List in his or her former title must include a copy of the appointment to 1SG with the DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits). In order to justify correction of a military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018571

    Original file (20140018571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of first sergeant (1SG)/pay grade E-8; not master sergeant (MSG)/E-8 as indicated in his retirement orders. The applicant provides copies of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record, three certificates, military occupational specialty (MOS) orders, award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), retirement orders, DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019220

    Original file (20140019220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also shows he entered in – * item 5 (Current Grade, Pay Grade Effective Date, and MOS): "MSG E8, 1 November 1982, 95D5M" * item 6 (Highest Grade Served on Active Duty and Branch of Service): "MSG, U.S. Army" 8. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of 1SG/E-8 because he was issued orders awarding him PMOS 95D5M. In addition, while the evidence of record shows the applicant served as Special Agent and Chief,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013273

    Original file (20090013273.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his rank title be changed to first sergeant on his retirement orders and on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), in effect at the time, paragraph 12-17, states that NCOs holding the rank of master sergeant at retirement, whose records show successful service as first sergeant, will be placed on the retired list in the rank title of first sergeant. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008186

    Original file (20140008186.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), chapter 12, in effect at the time, stated for NCOs holding the rank of MSG at retirement whose records show successful service as a 1SG will be placed on the Retired List in the grade title 1SG. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002096

    Original file (20110002096.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    SO Number 289, dated 15 October 1968 shows he was serving in the grade of MSG/E-8 with a Date of Rank (DOR) of 1 January 1968 at the time he was laterally appointed to the grade of 1SG/E-8 effective 18 October 1968. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), in effect at the time, stated to enter the grade taken from item 11 of the DA Form 2339 or the grade at the time of retirement on the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-200, currently in effect, states there is no minimum time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018054

    Original file (20090018054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Headquarters, Department of the Army Special Orders Number 60, dated 28 March 1969, released the applicant from active duty on 30 June 1969 and, on the date following, placed him on the retired list and transferred him to the U.S. Army Reserve (Retired Reserve) in the rank of MSG. Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel, Personnel Separations), chapter 12, currently in effect, states that NCOs holding the rank of MSG at retirement, whose records show successful service as a 1SG, will be...