Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011244
Original file (20090011244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  19 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011244 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the National Defense Service Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, and an honorable characterization of service.

2.  The applicant states that he received an honorable discharge from the Army but the DD Form 214 he received from the National Personnel Records Center shows his service as uncharacterized.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and letter from the National Personnel Records Center with enclosure in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 28 November 1987, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  He was subsequently ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) with a report date of 16 June 1988.

3.  On 19 August 1988, the applicant was released from IADT and transferred to his Reserve unit.  He completed 2 months and 4 days of basic combat training during this period of IADT.

4.  On 31 May 1989, the applicant was ordered to IADT for advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Jackson in military occupational specialty 71L (Administration Specialist).

5.  On 29 July 1989, the applicant was released from IADT and transferred to his Reserve unit.  He completed 1 month and 29 days of IADT during this period of service.

6.  Item 24 (Characterization of Service) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows his service was uncharacterized.  The reason for his release from IADT was expiration of his term of service.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations) provides, in pertinent part, that a Soldier who is in an entry-level status (ELS) will be awarded an uncharacterized character of service.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 defines ELS for USAR Soldiers as beginning upon their enlistment in the USAR.  It terminates 180 days after one continuous period of training for Soldiers ordered to IADT.  For Soldiers ordered to IADT for the split or alternate training option, ELS terminates 90 days after beginning Phase II (AIT).

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995 and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years or, for the first award only, a period of 3 years or less but more than 1 year.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the National Defense Service Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, and an honorable characterization of service.

2.  The applicant's records show that he served on IADT in 1987 and 1989.  The National Defense Service Medal was not authorized for service during these years.  Therefore, the applicant's request for this award should be denied.

3.  The applicant's records show that he did not serve on active duty for a sufficient length of time (a minimum of 1 year) to be authorized award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, his request for this award should be denied.

4.  The applicant's records show that the applicant was still in an entry-level status at the time of his release from IADT in 1989.  Accordingly, his service was uncharacterized.  Therefore, his request to change his characterization of service to honorable should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ___x_____  ___x__  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011244



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011244



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002449C071029

    Original file (20070002449C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed BCT on 21 July 1989, and did not enter active duty to complete AIT until 2 July 1990. Given the applicant was separated prior to completing 90 days of active duty service during her AIT phase of training, her service was properly described as uncharacterized in accordance with the applicable regulation. Therefore, the time for her file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 5 September 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020059

    Original file (20080020059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's unit commander notified him in the 15 June 1991 letter that he had accumulated 9 unexcused absences within a 1 year period, that he decided not to excuse the absences, and that he was declaring the applicant an unsatisfactory participant and transferring him to the IRR for the balance of the applicant's military service obligation (MSO). The evidence of record confirms the applicant was REFRAD upon completion of his IADT after completing 5 months and 18 days. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000112

    Original file (20100000112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: a. award of military occupational specialty (MOS) 94B1O (Cook); b. award and issue of the following medals: * Army Achievement Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Southwest Asia Service Medal * Kuwait Liberation Medal * Cold War Certificate c. correction of section VII (Current and Previous Assignments) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record (PQR)) to show all her assignments. The DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024574

    Original file (20110024574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), Chapter 3 (Character of Service/Description of Separation), states service of Soldiers in an entry level status (ELS) will be described as "uncharacterized." Paragraph 4-2h (Discharge or REFRAD upon termination of enlistment, and other periods of active duty or active for training), states ARNG and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Soldiers who are in ELS and who successfully complete a period of IADT their service will be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008127

    Original file (20100008127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted [emphasis added]. (2) The evidence shows the applicant had not completed 90 days of active service after beginning Phase II (AIT). Records show the applicant was honorably...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020911

    Original file (20110020911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows she was promoted as follows: * PV1- 23 December 1988 * PV2- 22 August 1989 * PFC - no entry * SPC - 16 February 1990 7. With regard to the rank/grade of E-1 recorded on the applicants DD Form 214; she enlisted in the USAR as a PV1 on 23 December 1988 and was promoted to PV2 on 22 August 1989. Additionally, the characterization of service for USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT and are in entry level status is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090927C070212

    Original file (2003090927C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) for the period 14 August 1989 to 16 December 1989 be corrected to show her character of service as honorable vice uncharacterized. The applicant provides: On 6 May 1994, the State of North Carolina issued the applicant an Order and Certificate of Name Change which ordered the change of her last name from Cxxxer to Pxxxxll.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025582

    Original file (20100025582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his uncharacterized separation document be corrected to show his service was honorable. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 correctly shows his active duty service as uncharacterized; he was ordered to active duty to complete his initial entry training and was released to his Army Reserve unit upon successful completion of this training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017745

    Original file (20100017745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his service was honorable instead of uncharacterized. Evidence of his discharge from this period of initial active duty training is not included in the applicant’s military record. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 months and 6 days of active military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006154

    Original file (20130006154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to an honorable discharge * the issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) 2. Active Army Soldiers on termination of active duty by reason of administrative separation (including separation by reason of retirement or expiration of term of service), physical disability separation, or punitive discharge under the Uniform Code of Military Justice; b. RC...