Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010907
Original file (20090010907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 February 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010907 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his rank of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 that was taken from him as a result of court-martial proceedings be restored.

2.  The applicant states that he was found not guilty of the charges brought against him at a court-martial on 15 December 1965.

3.  The applicant provides a third-party letter, dated 30 March 2009, in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 January 1963.  He completed initial entry training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He departed for duty in Hawaii on 12 June 1963 and was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 27th Infantry Regiment.  This unit made a permanent change of station to the Republic of Vietnam on 6 January 1966.  On 14 December 1966, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  Item 3a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 3b (Date of Rank) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) show his rank as private first class (PFC)/E-3 effective 27 September 1965.

3.  The applicant's military records show that the highest rank he attained while on active duty was SP4/E-4 effective 20 April 1965.  However, on 27 September 1965, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for failing to obey a post regulation.  His punishment consisted of a reduction in rank and pay grade from SP4/E-4 to PFC/E-3, 14 days of extra duty, and restriction for 14 days.  He did not demand a trial by court-martial in lieu of this NJP and he did not appeal this punishment.

4.  On 15 December 1965, a summary court-martial found the applicant not guilty of unlawfully striking a woman in the face with his fist on or about 12 November 1965.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his rank of SP4/E-4 taken from him at a court-martial should be restored.

2.  While the applicant contends that his rank of SP4/E-4 was taken from him during a court-martial on 15 December 1965, the evidence clearly shows that he was reduced in rank to PFC/E-3 on 27 September 1965 after accepting NJP under Article 15 of the UCMJ for failing to obey a post regulation.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010907



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010907



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012896

    Original file (20140012896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 3 years of active service and he had 4 days of lost time from 27 July to 30 July 1964. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013399

    Original file (20120013399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019927

    Original file (20090019927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 16 July 1979, while serving in the rank of SFC, a special court martial (SPCM) found the applicant guilty of violating the following Articles of the UCMJ: * 2 specifications – Article 132, for preparing fraudulent claims against the United States on 10 October 1978 in the amount of $871.36, and on 8 November 1978, in the amount of $1,729.00 * 2 specifications – Article 107, for with the intent to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002718

    Original file (20110002718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through his Member of Congress: * Award of the Air Medal with "V" Device and the Purple Heart * Removal of two DA Forms 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice) from his records * Restoration of his rank/grade to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 2. With respect to the Air Medal with "V" Device, based upon his application, the evidence of record, and accompanying supporting documents he has submitted, it does not appear that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006375

    Original file (20080006375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's record that he was recommended for or promoted to SP4/E-4. The applicant has not provided any evidence to show he was promoted to SP4/E-4. XXX _______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012002

    Original file (20080012002.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 September 1967, the applicant was discharged accordingly. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to change a discharge due to matters which should have been raised in the appellate process, rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019030

    Original file (20100019030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * total foreign service * award of the Purple Heart and Vietnam Service Medal * last rank and pay grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 2. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) prepared from temporary records on 23 May 1969 shows: * item 31 (Foreign Service) – arrival date in Vietnam not indicated and departure date from Vietnam as 24 May 1969 * item 33...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011907

    Original file (20120011907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Following MOS training and an assignment to Fort Leonard Wood, MO, he served in Vietnam from on or about 11 September 1965 to 10 September 1966. The governing regulation provides that the DD Form 214 will show the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025549

    Original file (20100025549.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090018027, on 22 April 2010. The applicant submitted an assignment order which was not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, it is considered new evidence and as such warrants consideration by the Board. In the absence of additional evidence that conclusively shows he held...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012512

    Original file (20060012512.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his rank and pay grade shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that was issued at the time of his release from active duty on 28 March 1966 be changed from private first class/pay grade E-3 to sergeant/pay grade E-5. A document, dated 22 September 1966, from Military Justice Division of the...