Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010866
Original file (20090010866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  16 March 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010866 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and his military records be corrected to reflect that he was retired in the rank of First Sergeant (1SG). 

2.  The applicant states that his records do not reflect the highest rank he held before retirement and should be corrected to reflect the rank of 1SG.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his retirement orders, a copy of his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), and a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 August 1979 and remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-8 on 1 January 2000.  

3.  His records show that he completed the 1SG’s course in 2000, was awarded the Special Qualification Identifier “M,” and that he successfully served as a 1SG in aviation units at Fort Hood, Texas from 1999 to 2001, before he assumed the duties of an aviation operations sergeant.  

4.  The applicant served a tour in Korea from 2002 to 2003 and returned to Fort Hood where he served as an aircraft maintenance supervisor in the rank of master sergeant.

5.  On 31 August 2005, he was retired in the rank of master sergeant (MSG) and was transferred to the Retired List in the rank of 1SG, effective 1 September 2005.  He had served 26 years and 10 days of total active service.

6.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects that he was in the rank of MSG and his retirement orders indicate that he was in the rank of MSG and that he was transferred to the Retired List in the rank of 1SG, effective 1 September 2005.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect an individual’s rank as it exist on the date of separation.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 serves as the authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 12-17 (Grade title on retired list of former first sergeants) provides that noncommissioned officers holding the grade of MSG at retirement, whose records show successful service as 1SG, will be placed on the retired list in the grade title of 1SG.  The only criteria for such placement on the retired list is that the Soldier must be serving in and retiring in the grade of MSG, must possess the SQI of “M,” and must have served as 1SG in the grade of MSG.  Service in the rank of sergeant first class does not meet the requirement.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect his rank as a 1SG has been noted.  The applicant was serving in the rank of MSG when he was retired on 31 August 2005 and his DD Form 214 correctly reflects that information.

2.  The applicant’s retirement orders clearly show that he was retired in the rank of MSG on 31 August 2005 and that he was transferred to the Retired List in the rank of 1SG effective 1 September 2005.

3.  Accordingly, his records appear to have been properly prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations.  Therefore absence evidence to the contrary, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the requirement.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x_____  ___x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Global War on Terrorism.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010866





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010866



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000476C070208

    Original file (20040000476C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Maribeth Love | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. It stated, in pertinent part, that a change of duty for members in the pay grade E-8 required a lateral appointment to or from MSG or 1SG. Therefore, in the interest of equity, it would be appropriate to correct his record to show his rank title on the Retired List as 1SG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018571

    Original file (20140018571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of first sergeant (1SG)/pay grade E-8; not master sergeant (MSG)/E-8 as indicated in his retirement orders. The applicant provides copies of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record, three certificates, military occupational specialty (MOS) orders, award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), retirement orders, DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001199

    Original file (20120001199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests placement on the Retired List in the rank of first sergeant (1SG) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as 1SG instead of master sergeant (MSG). It states that Item 4a of the DD Form 214 will reflect the active duty rank the Soldier held at the time of his/her separation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004212C071108

    Original file (20070004212C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant held the rank of 1SG at the time of his separation. The applicant's DD Form 214 does show that he was placed on the "Retired List Grade 1SG". Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to have his records corrected to show that he retired in the rank of 1SG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021257

    Original file (20120021257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 August 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120021257 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel, Personnel Separations), chapter 12, states that noncommissioned officers holding the grade of MSG at retirement, whose records show successful service as a 1SG, will be placed on the retired list in the grade title 1SG. There is no evidence of record to show he was a 1SG after 1 May 2010 or on his date of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015927

    Original file (20130015927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record contains the following: * Orders Number 140-10, issued by the U.S. Army Military Personnel Center, dated 30 November 1987, promoting him to MSG/E8 effective 1 January 1988 with a date of rank of 21 December 1987 * Orders Number 55-16, issued by the 546th Personnel Service Company, Fort Hood, dated 22 March 1988, terminating his rank of 1SG and appointing him as a MSG with a date of rank of 21 December 1987 * DA Form 2339 (Application for Voluntary Retirement), dated 1 February...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005217C070206

    Original file (20050005217C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show his rank title upon retirement was first sergeant (1SG) and not master sergeant (MSG), as indicated in his retirement orders. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Separation Document (DD Form 214); Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20); and Department of the Army (DA) Special Orders (SO) Number (#) 123, dated 26 June 1969. The regulation in effect at the time stated that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001008C070208

    Original file (20040001008C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his 31 December 1998 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: DD Form 214, dated 31 December 1998; Retirement Orders; DD Form 214, dated 29 November 1971; and Newspaper Extract on RVNGC. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on 31...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001403C070206

    Original file (20050001403C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that Item 4a (GRADE, RATE, OR RANK) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be changed from MSG (Master Sergeant) to 1SG (First Sergeant). e. DD Form 363A (Certificate of Retirement) showing his rank as First Sergeant. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001403C070206

    Original file (20050001403C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that Item 4a (GRADE, RATE, OR RANK) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be changed from MSG (Master Sergeant) to 1SG (First Sergeant). e. DD Form 363A (Certificate of Retirement) showing his rank as First Sergeant. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.