Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010793
Original file (20090010793.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  24 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010793 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests cancellation of her debt and payment for completing Inactive Duty Training (IDT).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the unit's S-1/Adjutant ordered her to attend IDT on 10 January 2009 with the 306th Psychological Operations Company (Strategic Dissemination), Los Alamitos, CA.  She adds the problem is that, at the time, she had already been honorably discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and she had enlisted in the U.S. Air Force Reserve (USAFR).

	a.  She states she was paid $123.98 for the IDT on 21 January 2009.  However, on 23 January 2009, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) initiated action to collect the payment based on the fact that she had been discharged from the USAR and was not in an authorized pay status.

	b.  She states she was only following the orders given her by a higher ranking officer of the unit after he advised her that she was still assigned to the unit.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of her application, copies of her discharge order, enlistment contract, two DA Forms 702 (Leave and Earnings Statement) (LES), a record of training, and four email message strings.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 2 November 2005 for a period of
8 years.
2.  Headquarters, U.S. Army, Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command (Army), Fort Bragg, NC, Orders 06-163-00029, dated 12 June 2006, show the applicant was reassigned to the 306th Psychological Operations Company (Strategic Dissemination), Los Alamitos, CA, effective 12 June 2006.  The additional instructions state, "[t]his is an involuntary reassignment for the convenience of the government."

3.  In support of her application, the applicant provides the following documents.

   a.  Headquarters, Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command, Fort Bragg, Orders 09-027-00056, dated 27 January 2009, that show the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR, effective 7 January 2009.  The additional instructions state, "[y]our enlistment in, or assignment to, the United States Army Reserve was terminated on the effective date of this order as a result of your immediate reenlistment in the United Sates Air Force Reserve on
8 January 2009.  No formal discharge certificate will be issued."

   b.  A DD Form 4-Series (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States) that shows the applicant enlisted in the USAFR on
8 January 2009 for a period of 6 years.
   
   c.  Two DFAS Forms 702.

       (1)  The LES, dated 21 January 2009, shows the applicant was entitled to $123.98 in basic pay; had a TSP [Thrift Savings Plan] Contribution of $6.20 with deductions totaling $56.52; and a net amount of $67.46.  The Remarks section shows, in pertinent part, "INACTIVE DUTY TRAINING 10 JAN 09-10 JAN 09  2."
   
       (2)  The LES, dated 23 January 2009, shows the applicant was entitled to $6.20 in other credits; with deductions totaling $4.13 for a debt payment; and a net amount of $2.07.  The Remarks section shows, in pertinent part, "BASIC PAY DEBT BALANCE $119.85; ORIGINAL DEBT $123.98 10 JAN 09-10 JAN 09; UNPAID DEBT BALANCE *TOTAL*:  $119.85" and "ADJUSTMENT PAY:  REF TAX DEF $6.20 090121-090121."
   
   d.  A DA Form 1380 (Record of Individual Performance of Reserve Duty Training), dated 2 June 2009, that shows the applicant performed 8 hours of duty and she was credited with 2 retirement points for providing Supply Section Support, Battle Assembly Functions, at the 306th Psychological Operations Company (Strategic Dissemination), Los Alamitos, CA, on 10 January 2009.  This document also shows it was authenticated with the electronic signature of the company commander.

e.  Four email message strings that show:

       (1)  the applicant informed the unit's S-1/Adjutant that she had enlisted in the USAFR;  (The S-1/Adjutant instructed the applicant to attend IDT with her unit (on 10 January 2009) in order to turn in her military equipment, that she was still assigned to the unit, and she would be paid.)

       (2)  the applicant informed the unit's S-1/Adjutant that her LES indicated that DFAS was collecting the amount she was paid for attending the unit's IDT on 10 January 2009 (the applicant was provided a signed DA Form 1380); and

       (3)  the applicant was advised to apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to seek relief from the debt.
   
4.  Department of Defense (DoD) Financial Management Regulation (FMR), Volume 7A (Military Pay Policy and Procedures - Active Duty and Reserve Pay), Chapter 1 (Basic Pay), paragraph 0101 (Creditable Service), provides that creditable service periods include, in pertinent part, active or inactive service in the Army, Naval, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Coast Guard Reserve.
   
   a.  Chapter 58 (Pay and Allowances for Inactive Duty Training), paragraph 5801 (General provisions), subparagraph 580101 (Entitlement and computation of inactive duty training pay and special pay), section A (Inactive Duty Training with Pay), provides that a member of the National Guard or Reserve Component is entitled to compensation at the rate of one-thirtieth of the basic pay prescribed for grade and years of service for the performance of each authorized period of regular inactive duty training (drill or unit training assembly).

   b.  A footnote to this section provides that to qualify for pay for a period of inactive duty training, each member shall engage in such duty or training for the period (not less than 2 hours) as prescribed by the Secretary of the Military Department concerned (or designee).  It also provides that a member cannot qualify for pay for more than two periods of inactive duty training during a single calendar day.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends her debt to the U.S. Army should be cancelled, that she should be credited for completing an IDT, and that she should be paid basic pay for the IDT period.

2.  Records show the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR effective 7 January 2009 for the purpose of her immediate enlistment in the USAFR and that she enlisted in the USAFR on 8 January 2009.

3.  The evidence of record shows that the S-1/Adjutant of the applicant's former Army unit instructed her to attend an IDT on 10 January 2009 in order to complete necessary out-processing and other tasks/functions.  Records show the unit commander certified that the applicant attended IDT on 10 January 2009 for a period of 8 hours and that she was credited with 2 retirement points.  Records also show the applicant was initially authorized $123.98 for this IDT period; however, due to the fact that she was discharged from the USAR on 7 January 2009, DFAS initiated action to collect the payment from the applicant.

4.  The applicant's status was that of a junior enlisted Soldier at the time she inquired into the requirement for her to attend the unit’s IDT on 10 January 2009.  The evidence of record shows that the unit's S-1/Adjutant instructed her to attend the IDT in order to out-process, and he informed her she would be paid as she was still assigned to the unit.  Records show the applicant was a member of the USAFR at the time.  Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that she felt compelled to comply with the instructions issued by a commissioned officer of the U.S. Army, notwithstanding the fact that she was no longer a member of the USAR.

5.  As a matter of justice, it would be appropriate to cancel the entire debt owed by the applicant that was imposed against her for attending the unit’s IDT after she was discharged from the USAR.  It is noted that the applicant was a member of the USAFR on said date.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show she completed an 8-hour period of IDT on 7 January 2009 [vice 10 January 2009], that she was credited with 2 retirement points for this IDT period, and that she was authorized payment of basic pay in the amount of $123.98 for this IDT period.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing she completed an 8-hour period of IDT on 7 January 2009 [vice           10 January 2009], that she was credited with 2 retirement points for this IDT period, and that she was authorized payment of basic pay in the amount of $123.98 for this IDT period.

2.  As a result of the above correction, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service shall be notified of the Board's determination, cancel the debt owed, and remit payment of all pay (less any withholdings and/or deductions) that may be due as a result of this correction.



      __________x____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010793



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020967

    Original file (20090020967.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his warrant officer (WO) accession date from 9 June 2007 to 19 July 2007. A DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 28 June 2006, shows the applicant extended his [then] current enlistment agreement of 17 December 1994 in the ARNGUS and PAARNG with an expiration of term of service of 19 July 2006 for a period of 6 years to accept a 6-year $15,000 bonus. Title 37, U.S. Code, section 308i (Special pay: prior service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022844

    Original file (20100022844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * a letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Alexandria, VA (HRC-ALX) * a DD Form 1172 (Application for Uniformed Services Identification Card - DEERS Enrollment * a DD Form 93-E (Record of Emergency Data) * an SGLV-8286 (E) (Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate) * a DA Form 3508 (Application for Remission or Cancellation of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005296

    Original file (20080005296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states that without further information of deployment status of her gaining unit, the orders issuing authority at Fort Lee, advised her to include her son on her orders and that if he did not travel with her to Germany, his concurrent travel orders would be null and void after 60 days and she would have to apply for command sponsorship in order to take him to Germany. The applicant provides in support of her application, a Memorandum for Record from her commander, dated 27 December...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005122

    Original file (20130005122.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of her: * notification of and request for remission of debt * Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) proceedings and medical records * sworn statements * transfer orders * separation documents and retirement orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows she acknowledged she received the orders as of 15 October 2010. On 9 August 2012, the applicant was notified of a debt in the amount of $26,526.00 incurred due to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002348C070206

    Original file (20050002348C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the incorrect zip code used to determine the applicant's BAH entitlement was input into DFAS in February 2002. Notwithstanding the fact that the incorrect zip code for the applicant's BAH entitlement appeared on her monthly DFAS Military LES each month the evidence of record shows, and the applicant acknowledges, that she failed to initiate administrative action to correct the erroneous zip code for over two years; including a period of 14 months while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089787C070403

    Original file (2003089787C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that she enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 16 November 1987 for a period of 8 years under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). A review of the applicant's records shows no indication that the applicant was ever notified that she was being transferred to the IRR due to unsatisfactory participation. Therefore, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to correct her records to show that as an exception to policy, she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014517

    Original file (20090014517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s unit commander prepared a Memorandum for Record, dated 5 August 2009, confirming the following: a. e. HRC-St. Louis should submit pay documents for the applicant and publish a discharge order effective after the date of her last drill. As a result, the Board recommends that DFAS waive the debt incurred by the applicant based on the erroneous payment of allowances for Reserve drills performed between 7 August and 5 November 2007 in the interest of equity.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012604

    Original file (20090012604.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that his mobilization orders were revoked on 2 October 2008, he was given a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report) that indicates he did not complete any service, and he was told that he was not going to be paid for the period 1 to 22 October 2008 or authorized any travel pay. e. USAHRC, St. Louis, Missouri, Orders C-04-807761, dated 23 April 2008, show the applicant was reassigned from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to the 421st Quartermaster Company (Airdrop Support), Fort...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022462

    Original file (20120022462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Overall, several errors were committed in relation to her pay in December 1998 and then her retirement formula, computation of her retired pay, the length of time she was placed on the TDRL, and the more recent debt that occurred as a result of an audit of her pay records by DFAS. The applicant provides: * Self-authored breakdown of each LES * Listing of what appears to be her credit report * Divorce decree * Audit Request Form * Letter, dated 3 August 2009, from DFAS * Letter, dated 22...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000682

    Original file (20150000682.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Headquarters, 18th Soldier Support Group (Airborne), Fort Bragg, NC, memorandum, dated 5 June 2001, subject: Request for Issuance of DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), shows the Noncommissioned Officer in Charge, Transition Services Office, requested the applicant's DD Form 214 be corrected to read, as follows: * item 12, block b: "2001 08 04" * item 12, block c: "0003 00 00" 6. As a result,...