Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010363
Original file (20090010363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	 5 January 2010 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010363


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Vietnam Service Medal.

2.  The applicant states he served in Vietnam on temporary duty (TDY).  He states that, while in Germany, he was attached to a Special Forces unit.  He was sent TDY to Turkey to train Turkish soldiers to become medical corpsmen, then he was sent TDY to Vietnam for 90 days to conduct medical corpsman training.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and a personal statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years on 18 April 1962.  He received basic training at Fort Ord, CA, and advanced training at Fort Sam Houston, TX.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 911.10 (Medical Specialist) and sent to Valley Forge General Hospital, Phoenixville, PA, where he served from about September 1962 to about September 1963.

3.  The applicant's records show he served overseas in Darmstadt, Germany, from about September 1963 to about March 1965.  He returned to the United States and was honorably separated at Fort Hamilton, NY, on 2 April 1965.

4.  There is no evidence in the applicant's records to show he was ever TDY to Vietnam.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.  This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Vietnam Service Medal for his TDY service in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant's records show he served in the Regular Army from 18 April 1962 to 2 April 1965 with foreign service in Germany.  There is no record of his having served in Vietnam.

3.  The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  The applicant was separated from active duty on 2 April 1965; even if there was evidence of service in Vietnam, he would not have qualified for the Vietnam Service Medal.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X__  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010363



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010363



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027020

    Original file (20100027020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000516

    Original file (20100000516.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his one year of service in the Republic of Vietnam and the receipt of any Vietnam service medals to which he is entitled as a result of this foreign service. Therefore, he is entitled to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show these unit awards. Records show he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his service in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004440

    Original file (20080004440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. xxxxx CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050009106

    Original file (20050009106.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Larry Racster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence does show that the applicant served honorably on active duty during one of the qualifying periods for award of the National Defense Service Medal. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by awarding the applicant the National Defense Service Medal to him then adding this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021835

    Original file (20100021835.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There are no orders in his records that show he was deployed to or TDY in the RVN 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days. His record shows he served in Okinawa from 22 August 1960 through 17 July 1962.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010908

    Original file (20110010908.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and all appropriate medals: Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the National Defense Service Medal. Records also show the applicant is qualified for either the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal or Vietnam Service Medal for RVN service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010064

    Original file (20140010064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DA Form 1705 * Veterans of Foreign wars Eligibility Information * Criteria for award of the National Defense Service Medal * Criteria for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal * Criteria for award of the Vietnam Service Medal (previously considered) * 173rd Airborne Brigade History CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows in: * Section 5 (Service Outside Continental United States (CONUS)), he served in Okinawa from 9 August 1962...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000703

    Original file (20130000703.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of: * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), for the period ending 20 October 1959 to show the Airborne Course * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 2 February 1965, to show in: * item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Overseas Service Ribbon * United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002876

    Original file (20080002876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Assault Badge was worn in the 1st Cavalry Division by former members of the 11th Air Assault Division (Test) and later in the 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile) in Vietnam as the Airmobile Badge; g. In 1974, the 101st Airborne Division develops a new Airmobile Badge for local wear based on one-week training at Fort Campbell, Kentucky; h. In 1978, the Army approves the new Airmobile Badge as the Air Assault Badge for Army-wide wear; i. The evidence of record shows that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002224

    Original file (20090002224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military personnel records contain a copy of Headquarters, Presidio of San Francisco, California, Special Court-Martial Order Number 324, dated 18 December 1964. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant served in Vietnam at any time during his military service. The evidence of record also shows that the DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 April 1961 documents this period of the applicant’s honorable active duty service.