Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010277
Original file (20090010277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010277 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, the removal of one award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and correction of another award of the ARCOM that is filed in his OMPF.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded two ARCOMs, one that was downgraded and the other containing several administrative errors, as follows:

	a.  The ARCOM awarded on 6 January 2008 [for the period 10 December 2006 to 7 March 2008] was initially submitted as a Bronze Star Medal, but it was downgraded to an ARCOM.  It is unconscionable that an award is downgraded due to a Soldier’s mere association with a command that sustained the dismissal of all organic officers and 3 of 4 platoon sergeants.  This information was passed during an office call with the 31st Combat Support Hospital officer in charge prior to his (the applicant’s) departure from Iraq in February 2008.

	b.  The ARCOM awarded on 26 June 2008 [for the period 25 July 2005 to
10 July 2008] from the Medical Department Activity (MEDDAC), Fort Sill, OK, contains an incorrect Social Security Number as well as incorrect information in achievement number 3, which states that he saw 1,000 patients when he only saw 871 patients, and the approving authority signed the DA Form 638 prior to the recommending official, thus invalidating the award.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) and certificate, dated 26 June 2008; and a copy of the DA Form 638, certificate, and citation, dated 8 January 2008, in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having had prior enlisted service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and U.S. Navy (USN), the applicant’s records show he was appointed as a second lieutenant in the USAR and he executed an oath of office on 23 April 2001.  He subsequently completed several military training courses, served in various staff and leadership positions, and he was promoted through the ranks to captain.  He is currently assigned at Fort Huachuca, AZ.

2.  The applicant’s records also show that he was previously assigned as a family physician to the Troop Health Clinic at Fort Sill, OK, from 25 July 2005 to 10 July 2008.

3.  During the applicant's tenure of assignment at Fort Sill, he deployed to Iraq in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  Upon completion of his deployment, he was recommended for award of the Bronze Star Medal in recognition of his difficult work and responsibility.  His company and hospital commanders recommended approval of the Bronze Star Medal; however, his brigade commander ultimately downgraded the award to an ARCOM.  

4.  On 6 January 2008, Headquarters, Task Force 62nd Medical Brigade, published Permanent Order Number 006-002, awarding the applicant the ARCOM for meritorious service while serving in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom from 10 December 2006 to 7 March 2008.  As this was a downgraded award, the DA Form 638 and award certificate are filed in the performance section of his OMPF.

5.  The applicant’s records further show that upon his departure from Fort Sill, he was also recommended for a second award of the ARCOM due to a permanent change of station (PCS) reassignment.

6.  On 26 January 2008, Headquarters and MEDDAC, Fort Sill, published Permanent Order Number 178-20, awarding the applicant a second ARCOM for meritorious service.  A copy of the award certificate is filed on the performance section of his OMPF.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) prescribes the policies and mandated operating tasks for the Military 
Personnel Information Management/Records Program of the Military Personnel System.  Chapter 2 of this regulation provides detailed guidance and instructions with regard to the initiation, composition, maintenance, changing, access to, and transfer of the OMPF.  Table 2-1 of this regulation shows that award orders (including badges and tabs) are filed in the performance portion of the OMPF.   Additionally, award recommendations that were downgraded or disapproved and correspondence that disapproved or downgraded the award are filed in the performance section of the OMPF. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that one award of the ARCOM should be removed from his OMPF and another award of the ARCOM should be corrected.

2.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant was recommended for award of the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service in Iraq.  However, his brigade commander downgraded the award to an ARCOM and he was accordingly awarded an ARCOM.  Furthermore, as required by the applicable regulation, when an award recommendation is disapproved or downgraded a copy of the
DA Form 638 as well as the order (award certificate) are required to be filed in the performance section of the OMPF.

3.  The decision of whether to award an individual a decoration and which decoration to award is a judgment call made by the commander having award approval authority.  The approving commander at the time of the act, or shortly thereafter, determined that his actions were so noteworthy as to warrant award of the ARCOM.  The applicant’s dissatisfaction with the approving authority's  There is neither an error nor an injustice. Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief on this issue.

4.  The evidence of record further shows that upon his departure from Fort Sill, he was again recommended for an ARCOM as a PCS award.  This award was approved by the approval authority and the order (award certificate) is properly filed in the performance section of his OMPF.  As this award was neither disapproved nor downgraded, there was no requirement and the DA Form 638 for this ARCOM award is not posted to his OMPF. Therefore, there is no basis for granting this portion of the applicant's requested relief.

5.  The purpose of maintaining the OMPF is to protect the interests of both the U.S. Army and the Soldier.  In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods; and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF.  Once placed 
in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file and it will not be removed from or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by an appropriate authority. 

6.  With respect to the administrative errors on the DA Form 638, it appears that these are harmless and/or typographical errors that do not invalidate the award, and since the DA Form 638 pertaining to this award is not posted to his OMPF, the applicant may utilize his current servicing personnel office to make appropriate pen and ink corrections to the erroneous entries.  

7.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X__  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010277



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010277



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014872

    Original file (20100014872.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documentation: * two letters of support * three DA Forms 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) covering the period 1 November 2007 through 31 August 2009 * BSM packet (award recommendation, narrative, citation, and certificate), dated 10 March 2009 * Headquarters, Multi-National Division (Baghdad), Camp Liberty, Iraq, Permanent Orders Number 083-001, dated 24 March 2009, revoking award of the BSM * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006605

    Original file (20080006605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) contains a recommendation for award (DA Form 638), dated 26 September 2003, which was submitted by the applicant's unit commander, a captain, and recommended the applicant receive the BSM, for meritorious service from 24 February through 1 December 2003. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012378

    Original file (20090012378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a self-authored statement, dated 17 July 2009; a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) for the BSM, dated 4 April 2005, and citation; a commander's statement, dated 8 April 2005; two DA Forms 2823 (Sworn Statements); an ARCOM with Valor certificate, dated 15 August 2005; and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in support of his application. There is no evidence of record that indicates the applicant or anyone in his chain of command...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090998C070212

    Original file (2003090998C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s OMPF currently shows that she was recommended for award of a MSM and that the recommendation was downgraded by the approval authority and approved as an award of the ARCOM, 1OLC. Evidence of record shows that the approval authority at Fort Leonard Wood revoked the award due to cancellation of the applicant’s PCS. Evidence of record also shows that the ARCOM, 1OLC was never presented to the applicant, thus negating the reason for filing the DA Form 638 in her OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013878

    Original file (20080013878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that this ARCOM should be rescinded and he should instead be awarded the BSM. The DA Form 638 submitted by the applicant confirms his commander recommended him for and he was awarded the ARCOM for his service performed in support of OIF by the appropriate award approval authority. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the ARCOM, as recommended by his commander, and that this was the award the chain of command felt was appropriate to recognize the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007854

    Original file (20080007854.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copy of an approved DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) dated 4 February 2007 and certificate dated 9 March 2007 for award of the ARCOM (downgraded from a recommendation for award of the BSM); a copy of a memorandum from the Commanding General (CG), Headquarters, Multi-National Division (Baghdad), subject: Reconsideration of BSM Submission, dated 20 November 2007; and a copy of a DA Form 638, dated 25 October 2007 and certificate (undated) awarding the applicant the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084708C070212

    Original file (2003084708C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Based on the foregoing, the Chief of the Military Awards Branch recommended that the applicant's request should be denied, that he should receive the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) approved by the Commanding General of the 5th Signal Command on 9 May 2002, and that the applicant's servicing personnel center should correct his official records to show this award. COL R, as the Chief of Staff and Headquarters Commandant of the 5th Signal Command at that time, indicated in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013914

    Original file (20070013914.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    a. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation effective date of 19 March 2005; b. DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) dated 2 September 2004; c. Permanent Order (PO) 295-06, dated 16 September 2004, which awarded the ARCOM to the applicant for his meritorious service from 13 March 2004 to 28 February 2005 in Iraq; d. memorandum, dated 12 November 2004, from Headquarters, 30th Brigade Combat Team (BCT) directing that PO 295-06 be revoked; e. PO...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002756

    Original file (20090002756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of the request for reconsideration, counsel provides copies of a Memorandum for Record (MFR) from the applicant's former battalion commander, the applicant's Non-Commissioned Officer Report for the period ending October 2004, a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), a Narrative Summary for award of the BSM to the applicant, an advisory opinion from the Military Award Branch to the Army Review Board Agency, electronic mail (email) correspondence from the applicant's former...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017748

    Original file (20110017748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states he was presented the ARCOM and CAB after his release from active duty (REFRAD); as a result, the awards are not listed on his DD Form 214. Permanent orders awarded the applicant the CAB; as a result, he is authorized addition of this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 March 2008 by: a. deleting the ICM; and b. adding the...