Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010035
Original file (20090010035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	      10 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010035 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM).

2.  The applicant states that he was presented with the medal while on active duty but it was omitted from his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in New Orleans, Louisiana on 
15 July 1968 for a period of 2 years.  He completed all of his training at Fort Polk, Louisiana and was awarded the military occupational specialty of 11B10 (Light weapons Infantryman).

3.  On 6 December 1968, he was transferred to Vietnam and was initially assigned to the 589th Engineer Battalion for duty as a forklift and tractor operator.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 18 March 1969.

4.  On 18 May 1969, he was transferred to Company D, 3d Battalion, 1st Infantry Regiment, 11th Infantry Brigade for duty as an automatic rifleman.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 19 September 1969.

5.  He departed Vietnam on 7 December 1969 and was transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) 14 July 1970, due to the expiration of his term of service.  He had served 2 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Combat Infantryman Badge.

6.  A review of his Official Military Personnel Records failed to show any indication that the applicant had been awarded the BSM.  Additionally, a search of the United States Army Human Resources Command Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), a web-based index containing roughly 611,000 general orders issued between 1965 and 1973 for the Vietnam era failed to show that the applicant was awarded any individual awards during his tour in Vietnam.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  Recommendations must be made within 2 years of the event or period of service and the award must be made within 3 years.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he was awarded the BSM for his service in Vietnam is not in doubt, his records do not contain and he has not provided evidence to show that such was the case.

2.  Therefore, in the absence of orders or other sufficiently compelling evidence to show that he was in fact awarded the BSM, there appears to be no basis to grant his request at this time.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ____________X___________
                 CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010035



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010035



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016358

    Original file (20110016358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was awarded the BSM w/1OLC and his DD Form 214 only reflects the award of the BSM. On 9 January 1969, Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division issued General Orders Number 442 awarding the BSM to the applicant for the period February 1968 to February 1969. On 28 February 1969, he was transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 12 September 1969, due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004369

    Original file (20110004369.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and that his BSM orders show the correct social security number (SSN). The FSM was awarded the BSM and the SSN shown was the temporary SSN issued to the FSM at the time of his enlistment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding the FSM the AGCM (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027050

    Original file (20100027050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). A review of the available records failed to show any evidence the applicant was recommended for or awarded the BSM for his service in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009848

    Original file (20140009848.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He completed his tour in Vietnam on 10 April 1971 and was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas where he remained until 24 August 1972 when he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to the expiration of his active duty commitment. The statement provided by the applicant from his company commander in Vietnam states that he remembered recommending and awarding the applicant the BSM for meritorious service in Vietnam and contends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002368

    Original file (20090002368.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and the Air Medal (AM) and that he be issued those medals. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000583

    Original file (20090000583.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant has not provided copies of the orders awarding him the two BSMs, his official records contain one order awarding him the BSM with one OLC, which in itself indicates that it was his second award of the BSM. Therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records at this time to reflect his award of the BSM with "V" device and one OLC. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018776

    Original file (20100018776.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service medal, to include the Vietnam Service Medal, for each credited campaign participation. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 7 May 1969 through 4 April 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018008

    Original file (20140018008 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 2 years of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, Army Commendation Medal, Air Medal, BSM, Meritorious Unit Commendation, Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and his marksmanship badges. The applicant served in four campaigns and is entitled to wear four bronze service stars on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018886

    Original file (20070018886.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the GCMDL. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant is entitled to be awarded the VUA, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, and one silver service star for wear on his already-awarded VSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004796

    Original file (20110004796.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during...