Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009983
Original file (20090009983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009983 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for a medical retirement.

2.  The applicant states that he should have been rated at 30 percent disability which would have allowed him to medically retire.  He adds that he was not properly counseled prior to his discharge and was unaware that he had to pay the severance pay back if he were awarded disability compensation by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA).  He also adds that he does not remember going before a physical evaluation board (PEB). 

3.  The applicant did not provide any additional documentary evidence in support of his request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080002460 on 13 May 2008.

2.  The applicant submitted a self-authored statement in which he presents a new argument which was not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, it is considered new evidence and as such warrants consideration by the Board.  

3.  The applicant’s records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years on 10 August 1972.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 13B (Field Artilleryman).  

4.  On 15 January 1976, the applicant was admitted to the U.S. Army Hospital at Fort Hood, TX, where he underwent an excision of osteochrondroma, right femur, after having complained of knee pain.  He stated that he had previously injured his knee when he fell on it in 1967.  He did well during and after the surgery and his wound healed satisfactorily.  He was discharged (from the hospital) on 23 January 1976.  

5.  The applicant’s records further show he was honorably released from active duty on 9 August 1976 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  

6.  The applicant’s records further show he executed a 3-year reenlistment in the USAR on 10 August 1978 and a 6-year reenlistment in the USAR on 11 July 1982.  He held MOS 71L (Postal Clerk) throughout his USAR service, attained the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5, and was assigned to the 351st Adjutant General (AG) Detachment (Postal), Tallahassee, FL. 

7.  The applicant’s Enlisted Evaluation Report for the period September 1984 to August 1985 shows his principal duty title was postal finance clerk and that he was rated “5” by his rater and “4” by his indorser for physical fitness (5 is the highest on the scoring scale).  This report states he did not complete the “PT” [physical test] due to a P-3 profile which prevented him from performing the running portion of the test.  Other comments included “has learned to use sound judgment,” “is extremely knowledgeable in the technical skills pertaining to his MOS [military occupational specialty],” and “has shown initiative and good judgment in maintaining close working relations with the finance section.”    

8.  On 21 November 1985, by memorandum addressed to the Commander, 81st U.S. Army Reserve Command, the applicant's immediate commander requested a medical determination for fitness to continue service in the USAR.  The immediate commander remarked that the applicant was issued a physical profile for a knee condition and that he had not been able to take the running portion of the Army Physical Readiness Test (APRT). 

9.  On 16 December 1985, the Command Surgeon, 81st U.S. Army Reserve Command, remarked that the applicant's records documented a severe, limiting, chronic right knee dysfunction for over 10 years, not corrected by surgery.  He further determined that the applicant’s limitations relating to his chronic knee dysfunction precluded meaningful activity from a military point of view, specifically mobilization and that the applicant should not be retained in the USAR. 

10.  On 10 March 1986, by letter, the Commander, 351st AG Detachment (Postal) notified the applicant that his medical records were reviewed by medical personnel in accordance with Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) to determine his medical fitness for retention in the USAR and that after this review, he was found to have had a medical condition which rendered him medically disqualified for further retention in the USAR.  Accordingly, he was requested to elect one of three options available to him under the provisions of paragraph 12-1 of Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations): 

	a.  discharge from the USAR due to medical condition which rendered him disqualified for further retention; 

	b.  transfer to the Retired Reserve in accordance with paragraph 6-1a of Army Regulation 140-10 (Army Reserve Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers); or

	c.  request consideration for a waiver of his disqualification under the provisions of paragraph 16 of Army Regulation 140-120 by the Command Surgeon. 

11.  On 15 March 1986, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the commander’s letter and elected to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

12.  The applicant’s records contain a DA Form 4651-R (Request for Reserve Component Assignment or Attachment), dated 31 March 1986, that shows he was determined to be medically unfit for retention as a mobilization asset by the 81st U.S. Army Reserve Command, Command Surgeon.  

13.  On 25 April 1986, the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve for medical disqualification.

14.  There is no indication in the applicant's records that he underwent a medical evaluation with subsequent referral to a medical evaluation board (MEBD) and/or a PEB. 




15.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rating of at least 30 percent.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years of service and a disability rating at less than 30 percent.

16.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army physical disability evaluation system and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating.  It provides for medical evaluation boards, which are convened to document a Soldier’s medical status and duty limitations insofar as duty is affected by the Soldier’s status.  A decision is made as to the Soldier’s medical qualifications for retention based on the criteria in Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3.  

17.  Chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-40 outlines the rules for processing through the disability system for Soldiers of the Reserve component who are on active duty for a period of less than 30 days or on inactive duty training.  Paragraph 8-2 states that Soldiers of the Reserve components are eligible for disability processing from an injury determined to be the proximate result of performing annual training, active duty special work, active duty for training, or inactive duty training.  Paragraph 8-6 of the regulation states that when a commander believes that a Soldier not on extended active duty is unable to perform his or her duties because of physical disability, the commander will refer the Soldier for medical evaluation.  Paragraph 8-9 states in pertinent part that a Soldier not on extended active duty who is unfit because of physical disability will be separated without benefits if the disability was not incurred or aggravated as the proximate result of performing annual training, active duty special work, active duty for training, inactive duty training, etc. 

18.  Army Regulation 40-501 governs medical fitness standards for enlistment; induction; appointment, including officer procurement programs; retention; and separation, including retirement.  Once a determination of physical unfitness is made, the PEB rates all disabilities using the Veteran's Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities.  Army Regulation 635-40, appendix B, modifies those provisions of the rating schedule inapplicable to the military and clarifies rating guidance for specific conditions.  Ratings can range from 0 to 100 percent, rising in increments of 10 percent.

19.  Army Regulation 140-10 (Army Reserve Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers) states, in pertinent part, that assignment to the Retired Reserve is authorized for Soldiers medically disqualified for active duty resulting from a service-connected disability; and medically disqualified not as a result of their own misconduct, for retention in an active status or entry on active duty, regardless of the total years of service completed.  Eligible Soldiers must request transfer.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his honorable discharge should be changed to a medical discharge.

2.  The applicant’s records show that when he entered active service in 1972, he appears to have had a preexisting knee condition that he suffered at the age of 15 in 1967.  During his active service, he complained of knee pain and subsequently underwent an operation at Fort Hood.  His records show he was honorably released from active service on 9 August 1986 with no medical limitations.

3.  The applicant subsequently entered the USAR and served through multiple reenlistments as a postal clerk.  At one stage, a review of his medical records determined that he was disqualified for retention in the USAR.  It appears that he was properly counseled and he was given several options, as required by the applicable regulation at the time.  As a result, he elected to transfer to the Retired Reserve; he did not elect consideration of his case by the Command Surgeon.

4.  In order to be referred to the Physical Disability Evaluation System, unfitting medical conditions must have been incurred while the member was entitled to basic pay.  It appears the Command Surgeon determined at the time that the applicant's medical knee condition primarily existed prior to his entry in service, and he presumably made a determination that his condition was not aggravated by service and, therefore, he was not eligible to undergo an MEBD.  Without an MEBD, there would have been no basis for referring him to a PEB.  Without a PEB, the applicant could not have been issued a medical discharge or separated/retired for physical disability.  At this point in time, 23 years after he was separated, there is insufficient evidence to show that referral to an MEBD/PEB or a medical retirement was warranted.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  In view of the circumstances in this case, there is insufficient evidence to grant the requested relief.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20080002460, dated 13 May 2008.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009983



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009983



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011260

    Original file (20090011260.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that she did not meet medical standards and was placed in the Retired Reserve but should have been medically retired. The applicant provides the following documents in support of this application: a. four copies of her DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 14 March 2005, 5 April 2004, 19 December 2002, and 30 July 1994; b. a copy of a DD Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 27 April 2002; c. a DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002619

    Original file (20080002619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 May 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002619 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Along with the notification, the applicant was required to acknowledge the notification and elect one of the following options on the notification of medical unfitness for retention and election of options, in accordance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005853

    Original file (20080005853.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080005853 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Upon review of the records, the PEB determined that the applicant’s shoulder was zero percent disabling prior to his ILOD accident. Army Regulation 635-40 provides that if the PEB determines that an individual is physically unfit, it recommends the percentage of disability to be awarded which, in turn, determines whether an individual will be discharged with severance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007632

    Original file (20080007632.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief recommended that the request for continuance on active duty not be favorably considered due to the physical impairment described on the attached DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings) and in available medical records. Army Regulation 635-40 also provides that a Soldier may be separated with severance pay if the Soldier's disability is rated at less than 30 percent, if the Soldier has less than 20 years of service as defined in Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1208, and if the Soldier's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017724

    Original file (20090017724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), establishes the Army physical disability evaluation system and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012734

    Original file (20090012734.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was a career Reservist and he was not informed at the time of his discharge that he could elect to be transferred to the Retired Reserve based on at least 15 qualifying years of service. The command surgeon also remarked that the applicant did not meet the retention standards of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness). On 23 June 1999, the applicant's immediate commander requested the applicant's separation from the USAR by memorandum...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019966

    Original file (20120019966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his honorable discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to a medical retirement. Once a determination of physical unfitness is made, the PEB rates all disabilities using the VA Schedule of Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070019012

    Original file (20070019012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records as follows: a. medical retirement instead of honorable discharge, which would, in effect, entitle him to Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits and disability; b. correction of his Chronological Statement of Retired Points to show he has 16 qualifying years for retirement instead of 15; and c. an opportunity to reenter the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and complete the remainder of his service to reach 20 qualifying years for non-regular...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006526C070205

    Original file (20060006526C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions under consideration were: (a) Left Knee Condition, Degenerative Joint Disease; and (b) Chronic Pain. Army Regulation 135-178, paragraph 12-1, states, in pertinent part, that reserve enlisted soldiers who are no longer qualified for retention by reason of medical unfitness under the standards of AR 40-501, chapter 3 (Medical Fitness Standards for Retention and Separation Including Retirement), will be discharged unless they are granted a waiver of the medical disqualification...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007329

    Original file (20100007329.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4, by reason of completion of his required active service. On 23 January 2006, he submitted another application for active duty, wherein he volunteered to enter active duty for a period of 1 year during February, March, or April 2006. Even though he had a physical profile, it was temporary in...