Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009910
Original file (20090009910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 December 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009910 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests promotion reconsideration by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) based on the criteria of the Calendar Years 2008 and 2009 (CY 08 and CY 09) Sergeant First Class (SFC), E-7 Promotion Boards.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, she was given a relief-for-cause NCOER (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report) for the period October 2007 through January 2008.  She appealed the NCOER through the Army Special Review Board (ASRB) based on substantive inaccuracies.  On 12 February 2009, the ASRB directed the report be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF); however, this was not done before the CY 09 Promotion Board convened and reviewed her record.

3.  The applicant provides a two-page email from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC), Appeals and Corrections Branch, dated
17 April 2009; a two-page email from the USAHRC, Enlisted Promotions Branch, dated 14 April 2009; and a copy of her ASRB Record of Proceedings, dated
12 February 2009, in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is presently serving on active duty at Fort Campbell, KY.  Her record shows she was promoted to the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 on 1 August 2002.


2.  The applicant received a relief-for-cause NCOER covering the period October 2007 through January 2008 while serving as the Emergency Medical Treatment (EMT) Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) for a Level III Combat Support Hospital forward deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

3.  On 29 June 2008, the applicant appealed the NCOER.

4.  On 12 February 2009, the ASRB directed removal of the NCOER from the applicant's OMPF.  Records show she was a three time non-select and the NCOER identified for removal was not the sole reason for her multiple non-selections.  Therefore, the ASRB specifically directed the applicant receive no promotion reconsideration

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) prescribes the Army's enlisted promotions and reductions policy.  Chapter 4 provides guidance on centralized promotions to SFC, master sergeant (MSG), and sergeant major (SGM).  Paragraph 4-14 contains the rules for reconsideration by a STAB, and paragraph 6-13e provides that STABs are convened to consider records of those Soldiers whose records were not properly constituted, due to material error, when reviewed by the regular board.  STABs normally will be granted when an adverse NCOER, which was reviewed by a promotion board, was subsequently declared invalid in whole or in part and was determined by the ASRB to constitute a material error.

6.  The enlisted promotions regulation further states that an error is considered material when there is a reasonable chance that had the error not existed, the Soldier may have been selected.  It further states, in pertinent part, that reconsideration by a STAB will normally be granted when an adverse evaluation report was subsequently declared invalid in whole or in part.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests promotion reconsideration by a STAB based on the criteria of the CY 08 and 09 SFC, E-7 Promotion Boards.

2.  The ASRB removed the relief-for-cause NCOER from the applicant’s OMPF because of substantive inaccuracies in the report.  However, the ASRB determined that relief for cause NCOER was not the sole reason for her multiple non-selections.  Therefore, the ASRB directed the applicant receive no promotion reconsideration


3.  The NCOER ordered removed by the ASRB was an adverse, relief-for-cause NCOER.  Its removal materially changed the applicant’s OMPF for the better and 
should have resulted in a promotion relook by a STAB using the CY 08 and 09 SFC, E-7 Promotion Board criteria.  Therefore, notwithstanding the ASRB's determination that promotion reconsideration was not applicable, it is concluded that it would be appropriate and would serve the interest of justice to grant the applicant's request that her record be reconsidered by a STAB under the criteria used by the CY 08 and 09 SFC promotion selection boards that considered her for promotion while the subject NCOER was on file in her OMPF.

4.  If the STAB selects the applicant for promotion under the criteria of an earlier promotion selection board, her record should be corrected accordingly.  That is, the effective date and DOR of her SFC promotion should be adjusted to coincide with the date she would have been promoted under the earlier promotion selection board's criteria, and she should be provided any back pay and allowances due as a result.  If she is not selected for promotion under earlier criteria, she should be so notified.  

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting her corrected record to a duly constituted STAB for promotion consideration to SFC/E-7 under the criteria followed by the CY 08 and CY 09 promotion selection boards that considered her record for promotion to SFC/E-7 while the contested NCOER was on file in her OMPF.

2.  If she is selected for promotion by the Stand-By Advisory Board, her record should be corrected by establishing her SFC/E-7 promotion effective date and date of rank as if she had been originally selected under the earlier criteria 
identified by the STAB, and by providing her all back pay and allowances due as a result.
3.  If she is not selected for promotion by the STAB, she should be so notified by the appropriate USAHRC promotion officials.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009910



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009910



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004218C070205

    Original file (20060004218C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, notwithstanding the ESRB determination that promotion reconsideration was not applicable, it is concluded that it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to grant an exception to policy that would allow the applicant's record to be reconsidered by a STAB under the criteria used by every SFC promotion selection board that considered her for promotion while the invalid NCOER was on file in her OMPF. If the STAB selects the applicant for promotion under the criteria...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008580

    Original file (20080008580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 16 June 1980 and his date of birth (DOB) is recorded as 18 June 1948. However, the message that announced that board specifically stated that the eligibility criteria for appointment as TPU CSM included, if the Soldier was a MSG with a PEBD of 1 March 1972 and later (the applicant's PEBD was 16 June 1974) and with a date of rank of 6 June 2001 and earlier (the applicant's date of rank was 16 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150014466

    Original file (20150014466.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) by removing a DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) for the period 15 February through 29 July 2009. The applicant states that the subject NCOER as filed in her OMPF was altered after she signed it. They further assert that the report submitted with this application is the correct report that should be filed in her OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011490

    Original file (20100011490.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of his relief-for-cause DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report [NCOER]) covering the period September 2003 through April 2004 from his official military personnel file (OMPF). On 29 December 2004, the applicant requested a CI and to have the relief-for-cause NCOER removed from his record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Removing the DA Form 2166-8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018830

    Original file (20110018830.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The period of the contested report is from 20080701 through 20090303. The contested report was not rendered in accordance with Army Regulation 623-3, paragraph 2-12, which states that a rater must assess the performance of the rated Soldier, using all reasonable means to include personal contact, records, and reports, and the information provided by the rated officer on the DA Form 2166-8-1. c. The applicant was not counseled appropriately and allowed the full opportunity to correct his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022020

    Original file (20100022020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states the results of his NCOER appeal were provided to him on 20 March 2010. There is no available evidence showing the applicant requested a Commander's Inquiry regarding the contested NCOER. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) provides Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions regarding an applicant's request for the correction of a military record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016579

    Original file (20140016579.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, the signatures in Part II (Authentication), in item c (Rated NCO) and item d (Name of Reviewer) of the contested NCOER, are forgeries. The senior rater will obtain the rated NCO’s signature or enter the appropriate statement "NCO refuses to sign" or "NCO unavailable for signature." (1) If he is selected for promotion by the Standby Advisory Board and he is otherwise qualified, his record should be corrected by establishing his sergeant first class promotion effective date and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074854C070403

    Original file (2002074854C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that all documents relating to his request for correction/removal from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) of a Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) for the period February 1994 through January 1995 be removed from the restricted portion (R-Fiche) of his OMPF; that the NCOERs on file in his record dating from 1 July 1996 be corrected to reflect service in the rank and pay grade of sergeant first class/E-7, (SFC/E-7), vice staff sergeant/E-6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008183

    Original file (20120008183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His rater entered the following bullet comments: "unreliable Soldier who consistently failed to perform"; "misleadingly accused Soldier of an offense by withholding pertinent information, resulting in an unnecessary investigation of incriminated Soldier"; and "repeatedly failed to report for duty." Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) provides Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions regarding an applicant's request for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006827

    Original file (20140006827.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration for promotion to sergeant first class (SFC)/E7 by a Department of the Army (DA) Enlisted Standby Advisory Board (STAB), based on the decision promulgated by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110023559, dated 22 March 2012. The applicant states: * he requested the removal from his records of an incorrect DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Evaluation Report (NCOER)) from the 2008 timeframe...