Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009891
Original file (20090009891.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE: 	       10 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009891 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that item 27 (Reentry Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was released from active duty due to an illegal board and that his discharge was upgraded by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB); however, his reentry eligibility (RE) code remained "3."  He states that RE code 3 will not allow him to enlist.  He indicates that he is attempting to correct a possible mistake on his DD Form 214 and that he is unaware of the classifications of RE codes.  He points out that due to the circumstances of his discharge he does not understand why he would not be allowed to return to service.

3.  The applicant also states that he is presently seeking an enlistment; that his time in service was one of the incomplete tasks in his life; that there were a few things he wanted to experience before he got out, such as airborne school and Ranger training; and that with his current RE code he has to get a waiver.

4.  The applicant provides a copy of his reissued DD Form 214 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 May 1999.  He served as an administrative specialist in Kosovo from 1 August 2001 to 1 December 2001.

3.  On 8 February 2002, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for failing to obey a lawful order.

4.  On 3 April 2002, the applicant was notified of his pending separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 14, for misconduct (pattern of misconduct).  On 18 April 2002, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed that the applicant be issued a general discharge.

5.  On 1 May 2002, the applicant was separated with a general discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, for misconduct (pattern of misconduct).  He had completed 2 years, 11 months, and 6 days of creditable active service.

6.  Item 25 (Separation Authority) of the applicant's original DD Form 214 shows the entry "AR 635-200, PARA 14-12B."  Item 26 (Separation Code) of this DD Form 214 shows the entry "JKA."  Item 27 of this DD Form 214 shows the entry "3."  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of this DD Form 214 shows the entry "MISCONDUCT."

7.  On 20 August 2004, the ADRB upgraded the applicant's general discharge to honorable.  The ADRB also directed that his narrative reason for separation be changed to Secretarial Authority under the provisions of Army Regulation 
635-200, chapter 5, and that his separation code be changed to "JFF."  The ADRB Office of the Secretary of the Army Form 172 (Case Report and Directive) states, in pertinent part, that "This action does not entail a change to the reentry eligibility (RE) code."

8.  The applicant was issued a new DD Form 214.  Item 25 of this DD Form 214 shows the entry "AR 635-200 PARA 5-3."  Item 26 of this DD Form 214 shows the entry "JFF."  Item 27 of this DD Form 214 shows the entry "3."  Item 28 of this DD Form 214 shows the entry "SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY."

9.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel from active duty.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories included minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, conviction by civil authorities, and abuse of illegal drugs.  The issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.  However, the separation authority may direct a general discharge if such is merited by the member's overall record.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation states the reason for separation based on separation code "JFF" is "Secretarial Authority" and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-3.

11.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 () covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of this regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior-service applicants for enlistment.  This chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes.

12.  RE-3 applies to persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but the disqualification is waivable.

13.  RE-1 applies to persons completing an initial term of active service who were fully qualified when last separated.

14.  The Separation Program Designator Code/Reentry Code Cross Reference Table, dated March 2001, shows that when the separation program designator is "JFF," the Headquarters, Department of the Army, directive authorizing the separation program or specific separation will provide the RE code.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Notwithstanding the ADRB's decision to upgrade his discharge and change the reason for the applicant's separation, it appears he was issued the correct RE code and it was within the ADRB’s authority to direct that he retain RE code 3.  The applicant has provided no evidence which shows his RE code is incorrect.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

2.  The applicant's current RE code is a waivable disqualification.  Therefore, as recruitment requirements change, the applicant may still apply for service in the Armed Forces and request the appropriate waiver.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009891



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009891



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026707

    Original file (20100026707.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 25 (Separation Authority) of his original DD Form 214 shows the entry "Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(1)." Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated 8 September 2005, shows that when the SPD code is "JFF," the Department of the Army directive authorizing the separation program or specific...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001153

    Original file (20110001153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his reentry (RE) code as "1" instead of "3" and to change his separation program designator (SPD) code of "JFF." b. JFF is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-3, by reason of Secretarial Authority. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003640

    Original file (20090003640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 July 2007, the ADRB granted the applicant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of his service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 14-12(c) of AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct and the "JFF" SPD code is the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008506

    Original file (20100008506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed * rehabilitation was not attempted or even evaluated * the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) states the evidence of record shows her separation action was improperly approved at the special court-martial convening authority level * the ADRB determined the discharge was improper and her general discharge was upgraded to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004222

    Original file (20070004222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of her general discharge on 15 August 2006. The regulation shows that the separation program designator (SPD) "JKK", as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214, is appropriate for discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is "misconduct, commission of a serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs" and the authority for discharge under this SPD is "Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2)." The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005832

    Original file (20090005832.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his original DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 16 June 2003 with a characterization of service of under honorable conditions (general) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12c(2) after completing 6 years, 1 month, and 13 days of active military service with 303 days of lost time due to AWOL. On 9 May 2006, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) granted an upgrade of the applicant's characterization of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007220

    Original file (20100007220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities, the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD code to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation shows that the SPD of JKK as shown on the applicant's original DD Form 214 is appropriate for voluntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is Misconduct (Drug Abuse) and the authority for discharge is Army Regulation 635–200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015399

    Original file (20090015399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 1574 (Report of Proceedings by Investigating Officer/Board of Officers) shows the board was held on 8 June 2007 and the board members recommended that the applicant be separated for misconduct with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Evidence of record shows he was separated from the military by reason of misconduct (drug abuse). Although the ADRB granted partial relief in the applicant's request for a discharge upgrade but determined the reason for his discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020977

    Original file (20090020977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 December 2002 to show: * completion of first full term of service * rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 instead of private (PV1)/E-1 * reentry eligibility (RE) code of 1 instead RE code 3 2. There is no evidence in the applicant's record that shows he was advanced to the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 during his period of service. The applicant contends that his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011032

    Original file (20110011032.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 2007, the ADRB carefully examined the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and determined that his discharge was improper due to the fact his chain of command had included some privileged information along with the other evidence in his discharge packet. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The evidence also shows the applicant was assigned the appropriate SPD...