Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009782
Original file (20090009782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009782 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 22a(2) (Statement of Service - Other Service) and item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 19 December 1967 and served in that status until entering the Regular Army (RA) on 15 April 1968.  He claims his DEP service was never properly accounted for in his military service record and it was not properly documented on his DD Form 214, which should be corrected at this time.  He further states that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) after his separation and it is not recorded on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides an ARCOM certificate, his DD Form 214, and a 
DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States) in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of 
Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) contains a DD Form 4 which shows he enlisted in the USAR DEP for a period of 6 years on
19 December 1967.  It further shows he served in the DEP status for 3 months and 26 days until 15 April 1968, at which time he enlisted in the RA for 4 years.  It also contains U.S. Army Security Agency, Arlington, VA, General Orders Number 43, dated 28 February 1972, which awarded him the ARCOM for meritorious service during the period 1 April 1971 to 14 December 1971.

3.  On 23 December 1971, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), in the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at that time shows he completed 3 years, 8 months, and 9 days of active duty service during the period covered by the DD Form 214 in item 22a(1) (Net Service this Period) and Item 22a(2) shows no prior military service.  Item 22a(3) (Total) shows he completed a total of 3 years, 8 months, and 9 days of military service for basic pay purposes and 22b (Total Active Service) shows he completed a total of 3 years, 8 months, and 9 days of total active service.  Item 24 of his DD Form 214 does not show award of the ARCOM.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) in effect at the time prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The instructions in the version of the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's REFRAD stated to enter all prior service excluding any service shown in item 22a(1) to item 22a(2), to include any period served in the USAR or ARNGUS as a reservist not on active duty during current enlistment.  For item 22a(3), enter the total of items 22a(1) and 22a(2).

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 further states that awards and decorations for all periods of service in the priority sequence specified in Army Regulation 600-8-22 will be entered on the DD Form 214.  Each entry will be verified by the Soldier’s records.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that the total prior service entered in item 22a(2) of his DD Form 214 does not account for his service in the USAR DEP was carefully considered and found to have merit.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant served in the DEP for 3 months and 26 days from 19 December 1967 through 14 April 1968, the day before he entered the RA on 15 April 1968, as evidenced by the DD Form 4 on file in his OMPF.  Therefore, item 22a(2) of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect this service.

2.  Based on the correction to item 22a(2), the total of the entry in item 22a(1) and 22a(2) should be reflected in item 22a(3).  Therefore, item 22a(3) of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect his total service.

3.  The applicant's record also shows that he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service from 1 April to 14 December 1971, but the award was not received until after his separation, as evidenced by ARCOM orders on file in his OMPF.  Therefore, item 24 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting from item 22a(2) of his DD Form 214 the entry "0  0  0" and replacing it with the entry "0  3  26";

   b.  deleting from item 22a(3) of his DD Form 214 the entry "3  8  9" and replacing it with the entry "4  0  5"; and

   
   c.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal.



      ___________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009782



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009782



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019693

    Original file (20110019693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000375

    Original file (20110000375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 16 June 1970 to show one award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) instead of two awards of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant states: * Item 24 (Decorations, Medal, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 June 1970 shows the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008051

    Original file (20100008051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 22a(1) properly shows the total amount of service completed between 28 June 1968 (inclusive date of current tour of duty) through 24 August 1973, a period of 5 years, 1 month, and 27 days. Item 22a(2) properly shows the total amount of service in the USAR DEP (2 June to 10 September 1967) and enlisted time from 11 September 1967 to 27 June 1968. The evidence of record he served in an enlisted status from 11 September 1967 through 27 June 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010502

    Original file (20080010502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence clearly shows that he completed 4 months and 10 days of total active service. However, the evidence clearly shows that he only completed 4 months and 10 days of active duty service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the entry, "0 4 10," in item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period), of his DD Form 214; and b. showing the entry "0 4 10," in item 22b (Total Active Service), of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062850C070421

    Original file (2001062850C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 2 March 1972 to show military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (automotive maintenance) instead of 94B (cook). He also requests that his date of entry on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 28 November 1968 be corrected to show 22 March 1968 instead of 29 November 1968. Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016583

    Original file (20080016583.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that item 17c (Date of Entry) of his DD Form 214 incorrectly shows that he entered active duty on 20 January 1973, and that his military records show that he actually entered active duty on 20 January 1971. The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS) on 20 January 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021212

    Original file (20100021212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending on 30 April 1971 to show his date of entry on active duty as 31 August 1967. The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period shows he completed 3 years, 10 months, and 16 days of creditable active service during this period of reenlistment. The evidence of record shows he initially enlisted in the RA on 31 August 1967 and he was discharged on 30 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002838

    Original file (20140002838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 31 March 1968 to show completion of 6 years of service instead of only 6 days. The applicant completed two periods of active duty service and he was issued a separate DD Form 214 for each period. There is no evidence the applicant completed another period of active duty service of at least 90 days in duration that would have required the issuance of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011067

    Original file (20090011067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 12 January 1973 to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam. Item 11d (Effective Date) shows the entry "26 Aug 69"; c. Item 22 (Statement of Service) shows the following entries: (1) Item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) shows "3 1 0"; (2) Item 22a(2) (Other Service) shows "0 6 15"; (3) Item 22a(3) (Total) shows "3 7 15"; (4) Item 22b...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001284

    Original file (20120001284.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * Item 38 (Record of Assignment) he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings * Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) the: * Bronze Star Medal * Army Commendation Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation * Combat...