Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009257
Original file (20090009257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  19 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009257 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his transfer to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Retired Reserve) be changed to a retirement due to permanent physical disability.

2.  The applicant essentially states that he should have been retired due to permanent physical disability instead of being transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve).

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored letter, dated 8 April 2009, which was addressed to a Member of Congress; a letter, dated 21 May 2009, from the same Member of Congress; his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period 24 January 2003 to 30 June 2004; a letter, dated 4 February 2008, from the Mobilization Support Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri, to a Member of Congress; and his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 memorandum (Selected Reserve 15-year letter) in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records, although somewhat incomplete, show that he enlisted in the USAR on 30 August 1983.  He was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) on 30 November 1983, completed initial entry training, and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 12B (Combat Engineer).  He was released from ADT on 22 March 1984 and transferred back to his USAR unit.  He was later awarded MOS 62E (Heavy Construction Equipment Operator).  He was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom on 24 January 2003 for a period not to exceed 503 days.

3.  Although the complete facts and circumstances pertaining to his release from active duty on 30 June 2004 are not in his official military personnel file, on 14 May 2004, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri, issued the applicant his 15-year letter.  This document stated, in pertinent part, that he was a Selected Reserve member with at least 15 years of qualifying service for non-regular retirement and that he was eligible under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731b (Special rule for members with physical disabilities not incurred in line of duty), to apply for retired pay upon attaining age 60.  This document also shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant requested transfer to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve).

4.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Alexandria, Virginia, orders, dated 16 June 2004, retained the applicant on active duty and assigned him to Fort Polk, Louisiana, effective 10 June 2004 for the purpose of voluntarily participating in the Reserve Component Medical Holdover Medical Retention Processing Program for completion of medical care and treatment.

5.  On 30 June 2004, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  Item 18 (Remarks) of the DD Form 214 issued to him on that date shows that he was separated by reason of physical disability and that he elected Reserve retirement in lieu of severance pay.

6.  The applicant provided a letter, dated 4 February 2008, from the Mobilization Support Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri, that was addressed to a Member of Congress.  This letter essentially stated that the applicant was released from active duty based on the findings of a physical evaluation board (PEB) because he was found unfit for service by reason of physical disability.

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731b, provides a special rule for members with physical disabilities not incurred in the line of duty.  It provides that in the case of a member of the Selected Reserve of a Reserve Component who no longer meets the qualifications for membership in the Selected Reserve solely because the member is unfit because of physical disability, the Secretary concerned may, for purposes of section 12731 of this title, determine to treat the member as having met the service requirements of subsection (a)(2) of that section and provide the member with the notification required by subsection (d) of that section if the member has completed at least 15 but less than 20 years of service computed under section 12732 of this title.  Notification under this subsection may not be made if the disability was the result of the member's intentional misconduct, willful neglect, or willful failure to comply with standards and qualifications for retention established by the Secretary concerned or when the disability was incurred during a period of unauthorized absence.

8.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) provides, in pertinent part, that under the laws governing the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System, Soldiers who sustain or aggravate physically unfitting disabilities must meet line-of-duty criteria to be eligible to receive retirement and severance pay benefits and that a disability must have been incurred or aggravated while the Soldier was entitled to basic pay or as the proximate cause of performing active duty or inactive duty training.  Line-of-duty decisions are reached according to policies and procedures prescribed in Army Regulation 600-8-4 (Line of Duty Policy, Procedures, and Investigations) and copies of line-of-duty decisions must be included in the official records of the case.

9.  Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), provides in paragraph 10-25 that Department of Defense Instruction 1332.38 states that members with non-duty related impairments are eligible to be referred to the PEB solely for a fitness determination, but not a determination of eligibility for disability benefits.  The Soldier is responsible for requesting that his or her packet be submitted to the PEB and the Soldier is responsible for preparing his or her packet for submission to the PEB.

10.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his transfer to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve) should be changed to a retirement due to permanent physical disability.

2.  Although the complete facts and circumstances related to the applicant's release from active duty and transfer to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve) are not available, the available evidence shows that he was found unfit by reason of physical disability for a medical condition that was not incurred in the line of duty and that he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve.  He was issued a 15-year letter and released from active duty and transferred to the Retired Reserve per his request.  As he did not provide any evidence which shows that any requirements of law and regulation were not met or that his rights were not fully protected throughout his separation process, regularity must be presumed in this case.

3.  It was determined that the applicant's physical disability was not incurred in the line of duty.  As Soldiers who sustain or aggravate physically unfitting disabilities must meet line-of-duty criteria to be eligible to receive retirement benefits, he was not eligible for a retirement due to physical disability.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_x______  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during his military career.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009257



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009257



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004266

    Original file (20130004266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 4 March 2004, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found that all his medical conditions existed prior to service (EPTS) and they were not caused by or aggravated by active service. c. Indicated the applicant was physically unfit and recommended that he be separated from the service without disability benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022326

    Original file (20120022326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She has found the Army did not file her medical retirement and she has now learned that her medical discharge and retirement should have been from active duty as she was serving on active duty at the time. She provides: * Order R223-02, dated 11 August 2003 * DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 29 September 2003 * DA Form 199, dated 10 October 2003 * memorandum, dated 20 October 2003, subject: Formal PEB Hearing for [Applicant] * DA Form 5890-R (Acknowledgment of Notification of Formal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005349

    Original file (20130005349.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: * her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period 11 June 1991 through 16 October 1998 * Orders 08-007-00020, issued by Headquarters, Army Reserve Medical Command on 7 January 2008 * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (Selected Reserve 15-Year Letter), issued by the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) on 22 October 2009 CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014487

    Original file (20090014487.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also advised the applicant that as a result of his medical disqualification, if he had at least 15 but less than 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay purposes, he could request reassignment to the Retired Reserve with early qualification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60. In it, he elected to be transferred to the Retired Reserve with early qualification to receive retired pay at age 60 because he had completed at least 15 years but less than 20 years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012469

    Original file (20070012469.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he was medically retired instead of transferred to the Retired Reserve. There is no evidence in the applicant's records and the applicant has not submitted any evidence that he had a medical condition which would have warranted his referral to the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES); therefore, he was not considered by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Without a PEB, the applicant could not have been issued a medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020617

    Original file (20140020617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, a 15-year letter so that he may retire from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) at age 60. The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant completed a total of 17 years, 11 months, and 21 days of qualifying service for non-regular retirement before he was transferred to the Retired Reserve in 2007 for medical disqualification. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007731C070205

    Original file (20060007731C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, issuance of a 15-year letter for retirement. His Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 16 September 2005, shows he was credited with 17 years, 11 months, and 11 days qualifying years for retirement. Title 10, USC, section 12731b, specifies that a member of the Selected Reserve who has completed at least 15 years but less than 20 years of service may be entitled to temporary special retirement qualification when they no longer meet the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083813C070212

    Original file (2003083813C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was eligible for transfer to the Retired Reserve under Title 10, US Code, Section 12731b; however, he was not aware of the proper procedures on how to apply. However, there are no provisions in active Army Regulations to transfer a Regular Army enlisted member to the Retired Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000180

    Original file (20090000180.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She further states, in effect, that she is confused about the medical conditions stated on the DA Forms 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 30 July 1997, 24 March 2004, 25 February 2005, and 1 September 2005, as they all relate to feet conditions. On 22 August 2005, the applicant concurred with the PEB and requested transfer to the Retired Reserve. As such, the unfitting condition was properly not considered service related and, therefore, would not have supported her qualifying for a medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009265

    Original file (20130009265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be issued a notification of eligibility for non-regular retired pay based on 15 years of qualifying service (15-year letter). However, Orders 04-103-00051, dated 12 April 2004, issued by the 84th Division (Institutional Training) show he was discharged from the USAR under other than honorable conditions effective the date of the orders under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations). The applicant states he was discharged...