Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009051
Original file (20090009051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  15 December 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009051 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reentry (RE) code be changed from RE-4 to RE-3 so that he can enlist.

2.  The applicant states that he only failed one drug test for marijuana as a private because he was having domestic problems with his wife who was extremely suicidal.  He contends that he was young, he was in a stressful situation, and did not know how to handle the stress.  He knows he made a mistake, but he has matured, he has completed a drug rehabilitation program, and he attended college to receive his Associate Degree in Business Administration and Accounting with a 3.0 GPA [grade point average].

3.  The applicant provides a memorandum from a staff psychiatrist, dated 30 March 2007; a character reference; his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); a certificate from the Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Inpatient Substance Abuse Services; and an Enrollment Verification Notice from the ASA Institute of Business and Computer Technology in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 27 December 2005.  

2.  On 13 February 2007, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for wrongfully using marijuana on or about 9 February 2007.
3.  The applicant was subsequently discharged on 19 April 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct - drug abuse with issuance of a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He completed 1 year, 4 months, and 22 days of active military service.

4.  His DD Form 214 shows he was issued an RE code of RE-4 and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of "JKK" (Misconduct-Drug Abuse).

5.  The applicant provided a statement from a staff psychiatrist at the Darnall Army Medical Center, Fort Hood, TX.  The psychiatrist stated he had psychiatrically examined the applicant’s spouse and it was his medical opinion that she suffered from a Borderline Personality Disorder.

6.  The applicant provided a character reference statement from a staff sergeant assigned to the 2nd Infantry Division in Korea.  The staff sergeant recommended the applicant for enlistment in the U.S. Army for a chosen military occupational specialty and described him as being responsible, mature, and extremely dedicated to his zest for the U.S. Army and its doctrines.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation shows that the separation program designator “JKK” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for discharge as “Misconduct-Drug Abuse” and that the authority for discharge under this SPD is “Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2)."

8.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

9.  RE code 4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is not waivable.

10.  Table 2-3 of the SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table establishes RE code 4 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) for misconduct - drug abuse.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he was having domestic problems, was young, and was in a stressful situation.  However, these factors are insufficiently mitigating to warrant the relief requested.

2.  The applicant’s request that his RE code of "4" be changed so that he may reenter military service was considered; however, it does not serve as a basis to change a properly assigned RE code regardless of the Army’s current enlistment policies.

3.  The applicant's RE code is based on his reason for discharge and cannot be changed unless the applicant's narrative reason for discharge is changed.  His narrative reason for discharge was based on his misconduct – drug abuse and there is no basis upon which this reason should be changed.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ____X__  DENY APPLICATION












BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009051



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009051



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022453

    Original file (20100022453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. On 20 April 2007, a telephone conference with his commander and supervisor revealed that in addition to using illegal drugs, he had also continued to drink to intoxication while enrolled in ASAP. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general discharge under honorable conditions. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005228

    Original file (AR20130005228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates on 23 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs for testing positive for illegal drugs (060530). The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004348

    Original file (20120004348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further stated he was recommending the applicant be given a general discharge, under honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with an SPD of JKK, RE code of 4, and a general discharge. It appears the separation authority took the applicant's complete military record into consideration when he directed the applicant received a general discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022218

    Original file (20110022218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 2007, the applicant was discharged accordingly. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate for a Soldier discharged for patterns of misconduct; however, the discharge authority may direct an honorable or general discharge if such are merited by the Soldier's overall record. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018124

    Original file (20110018124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 2007, the applicant was discharged accordingly. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate for a Soldier discharged for patterns of misconduct; however, the discharge authority may direct an honorable or general discharge if such are merited by the Soldier's overall record. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse).

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002049

    Original file (AR20130002049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 13 February 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2) AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission a of a serious offense. On 21 February 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. SUMMARY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021420

    Original file (20090021420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 September 2008, the separation authority approved the unit commander's request and directed that the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), with a general discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, provided the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013377

    Original file (20090013377.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 January 2008, the applicant acknowledged the proposed separation action under Army Regulation 635-22, chapter 14-12c for commission of a serious offense. He waived the requirement for a rehabilitative transfer and directed the applicant receive a general discharge under honorable conditions. On 22 January 2008, the applicant was discharged accordingly.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008673

    Original file (AR20130008673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 17 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense), for having wrongfully used a controlled substance, to wit: marijuana. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 10 May 2010, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002686

    Original file (20090002686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. There is no evidence of record which shows the RE code issued to him was administratively incorrect, in error or unjust. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.