Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008793
Original file (20090008793.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090008793 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that item 22 (Official Authorized to Sign) of his 2 May 2005 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be signed by the appropriate authority.

2.  The applicant states he was unaware that his DD Form 214 was not signed by the appropriate authority at the time of his discharge.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s record shows he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve and was ordered to active duty on 10 February 2004.  He served 1 year, 2 months, and 23 days and was honorably released from active duty on 2 May 2005.

3.  There is no signature contained in item 22 of the applicant's 2 May 2005 DD Form 214.  Additionally, a copy of his DD Form 214 is not contained in his official military personnel file (OMPF).

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  Paragraph 2-4, in pertinent part, requires the signature in item 22 of the official authorized to sign the form.  The signature indicates the information in the certificate is as correct as the records permit, that a quality control check has been made, and that the separation is valid and authorized by the approval authority.  Only a commissioned or warrant officer may authenticate a DD Form 214; however, when the chief or acting chief of the transition center is a staff sergeant, GS-07, or higher, or an authorized contractor employee, that individual may sign. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no copy of the applicant's 2 May 2005 DD Form 214 in his OMPF and it appears that the approval authority inadvertently forgot to sign the copy he provided.  Therefore, his records should be corrected to show that the approval authority signed the applicant's DD Form 214.  Additionally, a copy of this form should be filed in the applicant's OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

_____x___  ____x____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that his 2 May 2005 DD Form 214 was signed in item 22 and filing a copy of this form in his OMPF.



      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008793





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008793



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010562

    Original file (20090010562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 22 (Official Authorized to Sign) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 3 August 1991 be signed by an appropriate authority. Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected to show that an approval authority signed her DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. preparing a corrected copy of her DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017585C070206

    Original file (20050017585C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In pertinent part, the instructions for completing Item 4 state to enter the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation. The evidence of records shows that the applicant was promoted to the grade of rank of SGT/E-5, effective and with a date of rank of 1 December 2004. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to the grade of rank of SGT/E-5, effective and with a date of rank of 1 December 2004.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016579

    Original file (20140016579.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, the signatures in Part II (Authentication), in item c (Rated NCO) and item d (Name of Reviewer) of the contested NCOER, are forgeries. The senior rater will obtain the rated NCO’s signature or enter the appropriate statement "NCO refuses to sign" or "NCO unavailable for signature." (1) If he is selected for promotion by the Standby Advisory Board and he is otherwise qualified, his record should be corrected by establishing his sergeant first class promotion effective date and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007463

    Original file (20100007463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the first name listed in item 1 (Name) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and in his military record be changed from B____ to H____. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his discharge lists the same first name in item 1 as recorded on his DD Form 4 and in all other records and documents on file in his OMPF. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016080

    Original file (20070016080.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of Item 1 (Name) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 17 September 1981 to show his first name is W_ _ _ _ _ instead of F_ _ _ _. The applicant’s records show that he used the first name F_ _ _ _ in all military documents and records throughout his military service. Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted and served using the first name of F_ _ _ _ throughout his military career.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019750

    Original file (20130019750.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states her military records show her last name as "R-----." Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the active Army. The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect her correct last name throughout the course of her military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014160

    Original file (20080014160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020762

    Original file (20100020762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There isn't a request from the applicant for correction of his middle name or an approved official name change in the applicant's military personnel records. Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law, and regulations, the documents provided by the applicant are insufficient evidence to warrant a change to the name in his official military service records, including his DD Form 214. _______ _ _X______...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010724C070205

    Original file (20060010724C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and removal of all references made to the DA Form 2627 that are contained in a DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCO-ER)) that is filed in his OMPF. The applicant's military service records contain a DA Form 2627, along with a written letter of reprimand, the IO's report, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013092

    Original file (20110013092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DA Form 20 (Enlistment Qualification Record) prepared upon his entry on active duty on 28 May 1969, lists his first name as Steven in Item 1 (Name and Social Security Number). However, the record shows he entered, served, and was released from active duty under the first name listed on his DD Form 214.