Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008782
Original file (20090008782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 14 October 2009 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090008782 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he "caught metal" in Da Nang, Vietnam, on contact when his unit was overrun in 1969.  He indicates that his Purple Heart medal is not on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 November 1967 for a period of 2 years.  He served as a mechanic in Vietnam from 11 July 1968 through 9 July 1969.  He was honorably released from active duty on 9 July 1969 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

4.  There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

5.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 is blank.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There are no orders for the Purple Heart and there is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008782



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008782



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006423

    Original file (20130006423.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He did not think his wound merited the Purple Heart at the time of his injury. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) and DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) show he was assigned to Vietnam from 1 July 1966 to 1 July 1967. There is no evidence that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006177

    Original file (20140006177.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military personnel records contain no evidence showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the available records showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010906

    Original file (20100010906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to grant relief. Army Regulation 600-8-22 specifies in order to support award of the Purple Heart, there must be evidence confirming the wound/injury for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of or was caused by enemy action, the wound/injury required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014156

    Original file (20080014156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant provides a letter of support, dated 16 February 2008, from a Soldier who served with him in the Republic of Vietnam. In the absence of any other evidence which shows the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014501

    Original file (20100014501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicant’s service personnel records. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence in which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021533

    Original file (20120021533.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. The applicant contends he should be awarded the Purple Heart because he was injured while serving in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021081

    Original file (20090021081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant, which give conflicting descriptions of the alleged wounding, are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. _______ _ X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007228

    Original file (20100007228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicant's service personnel records. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013271

    Original file (20090013271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 30 August 1967. Based on the evidence in this case, the applicant is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart and its addition to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008629

    Original file (20090008629.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant reenlisted for 3 years on 21 January 1970 to continue his service in the Army 7. To be awarded the Purple Heart, substantiating evidence must be presented to show that the applicant was wounded as the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The applicant indicates that he was awarded the Purple Heart and wants a correct copy of his DD Form 214 showing this...