Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008549
Original file (20090008549.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090008549 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.

2.  The applicant states that his discharge was unjust because he was not given sufficient time to seek help for his drug addiction. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the approval authority's separation memorandum, dated 29 July 2005, and a copy of his battalion commander's recommendation memorandum, dated 2 March 2005, in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 6 years on 21 November 2001.  He completed the training requirements and he was awarded military occupational specialty 25Q (Multichannel Transmission Systems Operator/Maintainer).  The highest rank/grade he attained during his military service was specialist/E-4.  

3.  The applicant's records further show he served in Kuwait/Iraq from 3 March 2003 to 29 May 2003.  His awards and decorations include the Army Commendation Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon, the Army Service Ribbon, the Driver and Mechanic Badge, the Basic Marksmanship Qualification Badge, and the Global War on Terrorism Service and Expeditionary Medals.

4.  The facts and circumstances of the applicant’s discharge are not available for review with this case.  However, his record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that shows he was discharged on 21 September 2005 under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions.  This form further shows he completed 3 years, 9 months, and 7 days of creditable active service and he had 24 days of lost time.

5.  On 21 June 2007, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's petition for an upgrade of his discharge. 

6.  The applicant submitted the following memoranda:

	a.  a copy of a memorandum, dated 2 March 2005, from the battalion commander, 1st Battalion, 1st Air Defense Artillery, Fort Bliss, TX, to the commander, 31st Air Defense Artillery Brigade, Fort Bliss stating that he reviewed the applicant's separation packet for commission of a serious offense, illegal drug use.  The recommendation was approval with the issuance of a general discharge under honorable conditions; and 

	b.  a copy of a memorandum, dated 29 July 2005, from the commander, Headquarters, U.S. Army Air Defense Artillery Center, Fort Bliss, TX, through the commander 31st Air Defense Artillery Brigade, Fort Bliss stating that he thoroughly reviewed the separation packet and the findings and recommendations of the board which convened on 25 July 2005.  The commander directed the following:  that further rehabilitation requirement be waived and that the applicant would be immediately separated under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  He further ordered the applicant not be retained in the Individual Ready Reserve and he be assigned a non-waivable reentry code. 

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it was clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter.  However, the separation authority may direct a general discharge if such is merited by the Soldier’s overall record.  Only a general court-martial convening authority may approve an honorable discharge or delegate approval authority for an honorable discharge under this provision of regulation.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his under other than honorable conditions discharge should be upgraded to a general discharge.

2.  The applicant’s record is void of the facts and circumstances that led to his discharge.  However, his record contains a properly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 21 September 2005 under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 for committing a serious offense, illegal abuse of drugs with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. 

3.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  The applicant has provided no information that would indicate the contrary.  Further, it is presumed that the applicant’s discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.   

4.  The evidence of record shows the applicant’s discharge was appropriate based on his unlawful abuse of illegal drugs.  Based on his record of indiscipline, the applicant's service clearly does not merit an upgrade of his discharge.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008549



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008549



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009606

    Original file (20080009606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 July 2005, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), after careful consideration of the applicant’s military records and all other available evidence, determined that the applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable and denied her appeal. It identifies the SPD code of “KFS” as the appropriate code to assign Regular Army enlisted Soldiers who are voluntarily discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, based upon a request for discharge in lieu of trial by...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010978

    Original file (AR20060010978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Therefore, it is recommended to the Board that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 21 June 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015160

    Original file (AR20060015160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 21 March 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-Commission of a Serious Offense for having been convicted by a Summary Court Martial for wrongfully use of marijuana X2, with a general, under honorable condition discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012754

    Original file (20090012754.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 February 2006, the applicant’s immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with paragraph 14-12(c) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) for misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and for wrongful use of cocaine on four separate dates. The ADRB did not change the reason for discharge for the discharge was for misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs, and fully supported by the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011450

    Original file (20080011450.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ), dated 4 November 2004. The DD Form 214 also shows that the separation authority and reason for his discharge was Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), misconduct. The evidence of record shows that the RE Code “4” that the applicant received was appropriately assigned based on the authority and reason for his discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004317

    Original file (AR20080004317.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 and attached documents (3) submitted by the applicant. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, Paragraph 12c (2); by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reentry eligibility code of 4. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021465

    Original file (AR20120021465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 February 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, specifically for the commission of the following serious offenses: a. Based on the above misconduct, the commander recommended an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 12 March 1999, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request to waive his administrative separation board and directed the issuance of an under other than...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003065

    Original file (AR20090003065.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that in January 2005 (day not legible in file), the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct— testing positive for wrongful use of marijuana on three occasions, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 21 January 2005 the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily waived consideration of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016120

    Original file (20100016120.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Combat Action Badge (CAB) and the Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 May 2005 * memorandum from the Military Awards Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC) * Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) for the period ending June 2004 * Enlisted Record Brief * DA Form 4187 (Personnel...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002084

    Original file (AR20080002084.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c( 2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c (2) by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.