Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008472
Original file (20090008472.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090008472 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his 30 April 1988 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show that he retired in the rank of first sergeant (1SG).

2.  The applicant states that his records currently show his rank as master sergeant (MSG) and that they should show 1SG.  He maintains that his records indicate his successful service as a 1SG.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, promotion orders, and lateral appointment orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 November 1967 and through a series of reenlistments was honorably retired on 30 April 1988.

3.  Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows his rank as MSG.

4.  Item 18 (Remarks), a continuation from item 14 (Military Education), of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he completed the First Sergeants Course in 1985.

5.  On 9 May 1985, the applicant was awarded primary military occupational specialty 63Z5M.

6.  On 1 June 1985, the applicant was promoted to MSG/E-8 and on 3 June 1985 he was laterally appointed as a 1SG.

7.  The applicant's application for retirement shows 1SG as the highest grade he served on active duty.  Additionally, his retirement orders show his retired grade as 1SG.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 12, states that noncommissioned officers holding the grade of MSG at retirement, whose records show successful service as a 1SG, will be placed on the Retired List in the grade title 1SG.  The only criteria for such placement on the retired list are:  (1) the Soldier must be serving as and retiring as an MSG, (2) the Soldier must possess skill qualification identifier (SQI) "M," and (3) the Soldier must have served as a 1SG as an E-8.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation states that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  Paragraph 2-4, in pertinent part, requires the preparer to enter from the Enlisted Record Brief the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation in item 4.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's DD Form 214 is correct as prepared in accordance with Army Regulation 635-5 in that he separated from active duty in the rank of MSG.  His retirement orders are also correct as prepared in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 in that he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of 1SG.

2.  There is no provision to amend his DD Form 214 unless he was actively serving as a 1SG at the time of his separation from active duty, which does not appear to be the case.  As such, there is no error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_____x___  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008472



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008472



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008719

    Original file (20090008719.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show that he was promoted to the rank of MSG/pay grade E-8 with an effective date of 1 November 1985 and a date of rank of 31 October 1985. While it is clear that the applicant successfully served as a 1SG during his military career, he was laterally appointed from 1SG to MSG prior to his retirement. Although the applicant contends that his rank shown on his DD Form 214 should have read 1SG instead of MSG, evidence of record shows that his rank at the time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002970

    Original file (20090002970.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military personnel records show that after having prior active duty service, he reenlisted in the Regular Army on 12 April 1979. It also contains Headquarters, United States Army Fort Dix, Orders 096-7, dated 6 April 1990, which directed the applicant’s release from active duty (REFRAD) for retirement on 30 November 1990 and his placement on the Retired List in the rank of MSG on 1 December 1990. In the event the applicant desired a correction be made to item 4a (Grade,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019220

    Original file (20140019220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also shows he entered in – * item 5 (Current Grade, Pay Grade Effective Date, and MOS): "MSG E8, 1 November 1982, 95D5M" * item 6 (Highest Grade Served on Active Duty and Branch of Service): "MSG, U.S. Army" 8. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of 1SG/E-8 because he was issued orders awarding him PMOS 95D5M. In addition, while the evidence of record shows the applicant served as Special Agent and Chief,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007328

    Original file (20100007328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 August 1987 to show he retired as a first sergeant (1SG)/E-8. The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to MSG with a date of rank of 20 July 1985. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 12 (Retirement for Length of Service), paragraph 12-17 (Grade title on retired list of former...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020244

    Original file (20130020244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he retired in the rank of first sergeant (1SG). Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 12, states that NCOs holding the grade of MSG at retirement, whose records show successful service as a 1SG, will be placed on the Retired List in the grade title 1SG. The applicant's DD Form 214 is correct as prepared in accordance with Army Regulation 635-5 in that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014893

    Original file (20100014893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his retired rank as first sergeant (1SG) instead of master sergeant (MSG). The applicant provides his retirement orders and DD Form 214. In addition, the evidence of record shows his rank at the time of separation/retirement was MSG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021501

    Original file (20140021501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as master sergeant (MSG), his pay grade as E-8, and his date of rank (DOR) as 11 March 1985. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3961, provides the legal authority for the retired grade of Army personnel on the Retired List. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he retired from active duty in the grade of E-8 because he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018555

    Original file (20070018555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 28 February 1987 be corrected to show his rank as First Sergeant (1SG). Orders dated 15 December 1986 released the applicant from active duty effective 28 February 1987 and, on the following date, placed him on the retired list in the rank of 1SG. On 28 February 1987, he was still on active duty and the preponderance of the evidence shows he was a MSG at that time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024235

    Original file (20110024235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he retired in the rank of first sergeant (1SG). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 12, states that noncommissioned officers holding the grade of MSG at retirement, whose...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002096

    Original file (20110002096.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    SO Number 289, dated 15 October 1968 shows he was serving in the grade of MSG/E-8 with a Date of Rank (DOR) of 1 January 1968 at the time he was laterally appointed to the grade of 1SG/E-8 effective 18 October 1968. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), in effect at the time, stated to enter the grade taken from item 11 of the DA Form 2339 or the grade at the time of retirement on the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-200, currently in effect, states there is no minimum time...