Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008447
Original file (20090008447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	22 September 2009  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090008447 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected by adding the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that during the spring of 1968, he and two other Soldiers lost communications with the Fire Direction Center (FDC) while the compound was under attack.  He states that they ran a land line wire from the FDC to the guns enabling them to repel the attack and after an investigation of the incident, the S-3 officer, Major M, told them that they would be awarded the Bronze Star Medal.  He adds that shortly afterwards he left for his next duty station in Germany.  

3.  The applicant states that on 8 July 1969, he was given an achievement award by the 210th Group Commander, Colonel S, and he was told he was finally going to receive the Bronze Star Medal.  He adds that the group commander passed away and he never received the honor and assumed it would be on his DD Form 214.  He concludes that he is only asking for something two officers told him he was awarded.

4.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), a Certificate of Achievement and two letters of commendation in support of his application.




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 July 1966 and after completion of initial entry training he was awarded military occupational specialty 13E (Cannon Fire Direction Specialist).  He served in Vietnam from 23 March 1967 to 22 March 1968 and in Germany from 10 May 1968 to 8 July 1970.  He was honorably released from active duty on 10 July 1970.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show the Bronze Star Medal as an authorized award.

4.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the Bronze Star Medal as an authorized award.

5.  There are no orders or any other documents in the applicant's available records which show he was awarded or recommended for award of the Bronze Star Medal.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U. S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal orders for the Bronze Star Medal.

7.  The applicant provided a Certificate of Achievement and two letters of commendation which attest to his successful military service.

8.  United States Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Military Awards) governed the military awards program in Vietnam during the Vietnam War.  This regulation stated that the Bronze Star Medal could be awarded for heroism, meritorious achievement or service which did not involve aerial flight, but which was performed in connection with military operations against an armed enemy including combat, support, and supply operations.

9.  Title 10 of the U.S. Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion.  It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or presentation.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award or presentation of the decoration.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention and all available evidence have been carefully reviewed.  Unfortunately, there is no evidence which shows the applicant was awarded or recommended for award of the Bronze Star Medal.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correcting the applicant's records by adding the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal, this in no way affects the applicant's right to pursue his claim for the Bronze Star Medal by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008447



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008447



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004576

    Original file (20110004576.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there are no orders or any other Army records that show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device or that he was recommended for the award. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support the applicant's claim to the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. While the available evidence is insufficient for correcting the applicant's records to show a Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for the award by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011209

    Original file (20080011209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of a Bronze Star Medal recommendation in the applicant’s record. However, there is insufficient evidence to show that the applicant was present at the time of the battles he mentioned above or, if he was, whether his actions warranted the award of the Bronze Star Medal. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned to award the Bronze Star Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006626

    Original file (20110006626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Parachutist Badge, and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Therefore, he is entitled to award of four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 accordingly. With respect to the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007042

    Original file (20140007042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through his Member of Congress, correction of his military records as follows: * advancement to the rank/grade of sergeant major (SGM)/E-9 * award of the Air Medal * award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device 2. The applicant states in his letter to the Member of Congress: * he served in Vietnam and while there, he believes he was treated badly and unfairly; he served in Vietnam for 365 days and came back with only an Army Commendation Medal * he was chosen as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008046

    Original file (20100008046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025419

    Original file (20100025419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Forms 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the Bronze Star Medal. _______ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009366

    Original file (20100009366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that show he was recommended for or awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002670

    Original file (20090002670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device. However, the approval authority appears to have approved a downgraded award and issued orders awarding the applicant the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023038

    Original file (20120023038.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * a self-authored memoir of what occurred before, during, and after his Saigon trip * a statement of support from another individual * Congressional correspondence * DD Form 214 * Honorable Discharge Certificate * Discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * Letter of appreciation * Court Order for change of name * Statement in support of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) claim * Letter from the National Personnel Records Center CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018512

    Original file (20090018512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides a self-authored statement in which he claims on or about 18 March 1968, while serving in the RVN as an artillery mechanic, his unit came under a heavy mortar attack and one of their guns was hit and two tracks had to be replaced. The applicant is advised that while there is not sufficient evidence for the award of the BSM, this does not preclude him from pursuing award of the...