Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008122
Original file (20090008122.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


		BOARD DATE:	  1 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090008122 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reentry Eligibility (RE) code of 3 be changed to RE-1 to allow him to enlist in the U.S. Marine Corps.  

2.  The applicant states he has no existing pain or limitations in his leg that would prevent him from serving in any capacity.  

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); a memorandum, dated 24 July 2007, from the Junior Readiness Training Center; his DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile); three Standard Forms 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care); and his enlistment and reenlistment contract with accompanying documents.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 April 2003.  He was promoted to specialist four on 1 November 2004.  He was deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom.

2.  The applicant’s Medical Evaluation Board Proceedings are not available.  On 15 February 2008, an informal Physical Evaluation Board found the applicant unfit for military service due to right knee pain following a gunshot wound to his distal right thigh and recommended he be separated with severance pay and a 10 percent disability rating.  The applicant concurred with the recommendations and waived a formal hearing of his case.
3.  The applicant was discharged on 27 May 2008 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) by reason of physical disability with severance pay.  He completed 5 years, 1 month, and 13 days of active military service.

4.  His DD Form 214 shows he was issued an RE code of 3 and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of "JFL" due to disability, severance pay.

5.  Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.  The unfitness is of such a degree that a Soldier is unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating in such a way as to reasonably fulfill the purposes of his employment on active duty.  Paragraph 4-24b(3) lists separation for physical disability with severance pay.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation shows that the separation program designator “JFL” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for discharge as “Disability, Severance Pay” and that the authority for discharge under this separation program designator is “AR 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3)."

7.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records 
or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, 
policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.  RE–3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.

8.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table establishes RE code 3 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) for disability, severance pay.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he has no existing pain or limitations in his leg that would prevent him from serving in any capacity is noted.  However, based on the findings and recommendations of the informal PEB, dated 15 February 2008, the applicant was found physically unfit due to right knee pain and was recommended for separation with severance pay.  

2.  The applicant’s request that his RE code be changed from "3" to "1" so that he may be eligible to enlist in the U.S. Marine Corps was considered; however, his request does not serve as a basis to change a properly assigned RE code.

3.  The applicant's RE code is based on his reason for separation and cannot be changed unless the applicant's narrative reason for separation is changed.  His narrative reason for separation was based on physical disability with severance pay and he has provided no evidence sufficient to change the reason.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008122



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008122



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017357

    Original file (20070017357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB determined that the applicant was physically unfit for duty and recommended that he be separated with severance pay with a combined rating of zero percent. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. However, RE code 3 is the appropriate RE code for a Soldier separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004467

    Original file (20090004467.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his separation program designator (SPD) of "JFM" (Disability, Existed Prior to Service, PEB [physical evaluation board]) be corrected to the SPD "JFL" (Disability, Severance Pay). The PEB recommended the applicant be separated with severance pay if otherwise qualified. The applicant's discharge orders dated 22 July 2008 did not provide for his discharge with severance pay with a 10 percent disability rating.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008257

    Original file (20100008257.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The "JFL" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating (involuntarily) under chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-40 by reason of disability. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing his RE code from 4 to 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008352

    Original file (20080008352.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was discharged from the Army with a 20 percent service connected disability rating. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. There is no evidence of record which shows the reentry code issued to him was in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005013

    Original file (AR20130005013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for the discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012195

    Original file (20080012195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 October 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080012195 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect, at the time, established RE code 4 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24e(3) for disability, severance pay. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004494

    Original file (20110004494.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct: * Separation Code * Reentry (RE) Code * Period of inactive duty * Period in the Delayed Entry Program 2. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD code of "JFL" was the appropriate code for the applicant based on the guidance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020887

    Original file (20100020887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designator codes to be used for these stated reasons. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Chapter 3...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016989

    Original file (20110016989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 January 1997, a revised PEB Proceedings was issued and in accordance with Army Regulation 635-4040 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-22c (3), the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) modified the finding and disposition based upon the applicant's: a. personnel records indicating he was scheduled for separation from active duty for reasons other than physical disability; b. personnel and his medical records indicating he continued to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003896

    Original file (20090003896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was rated under the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and was granted a 10-percent disability rating for code 8299 and 8211 (moderate paralysis of doroscapular nerve) and a 10-percent disability rating for code 5295 (mechanical low back pain). The PEB recommended a 20 percent combined rating and that the applicant be separated with entitlement to severance pay if otherwise qualified. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of...