Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008024
Original file (20090008024.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		BOARD DATE:	  15 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090008024 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reentry (RE) code of RE-4 be changed.

2.  The applicant states that his character of discharge is honorable, but employment is very difficult with an RE-4 code.  He mentions the term "employment discrimination."

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 October 1982.  His highest grade attained was specialist four, E-4.
3.  A medical evaluation board (MEB) evaluated the applicant on 25 July 1984 and he was diagnosed as having bilateral chronic plantar fasciitis in both feet.  He was referred to a physical evaluation board (PEB).

4.  On 6 August 1984, an informal PEB determined that the applicant was physically unfit for duty due to chronic bilateral plantar fasciitis.  The PEB recommended that he be separated with severance pay with a combined rating of ten percent.  The applicant concurred with the findings and recommendations of the PEB and waived a formal hearing.  

5.  The applicant was discharged on 2 November 1984 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24e(3) by reason of physical disability with severance pay.  He completed 1 year, 10 months, and 12 days of active military service.

6.  His DD Form 214 shows he was assigned a separation code of “JFL” (Disability, Severance Pay) and issued an RE code of RE-4.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.  The unfitness is of such a degree that a Soldier is unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating in such a way as to reasonably fulfill the purposes of his employment on active duty.  Paragraph 4-24e(3) lists separation for physical disability with severance pay.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation shows that the separation program designator “JFL” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for discharge as “Disability, Severance Pay” and that the authority for discharge under this separation program designator is “AR 635-40, paragraph 4-24e(3)."  

9.  Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established RE code 3 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24e(3) for disability, severance pay.

10.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army 
and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.  Army Regulation 601-210 also provides, in pertinent part, that RE codes may only be changed if they are determined to be administratively incorrect. 

11.  RE code 4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is not waivable.

12.  RE–3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was discharged on 2 November 1984 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24e(3) by reason of physical disability with severance pay.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was separated with a separation code of "JFL" and was assigned an RE code of RE-4.  However, RE code 3 was the appropriate RE code for a Soldier separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24e(3) for disability, severance pay at the time of his discharge in November 1984.

3.  It appears that an administrative error has occurred in this case regarding the applicant’s RE code of RE-4.  Therefore, it would be equitable to change his RE code from RE-4 to RE-3.  

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing his RE code of RE-4 to RE-3 on his DD Form 214.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008024





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008024



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012195

    Original file (20080012195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 October 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080012195 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect, at the time, established RE code 4 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24e(3) for disability, severance pay. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009411

    Original file (20090009411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 31 October 1989. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued to the applicant upon his discharge on 19 November 1990 confirms he was separated, in the rank of private first class, under the provisions of paragraph 4-24e(3), Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), by reason of "physical disability with severance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012232

    Original file (20060012232.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MMRB also determined that the applicant's case would be forwarded to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) regardless of the MEB findings and recommendation. A Standard Form 88, Report of Medical Examination, dated 8 July 1985, found the applicant not qualified for further military service. It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015157

    Original file (20090015157.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her narrative reason for discharge be changed from physical disability, severance pay to a medical retirement in item 28 (Narrative Reason) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 September 1991. The PEB recommended that the applicant be separated with severance pay with a 10-percent disability rating. The applicant was honorably discharged from active duty on 30 September 1991 under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059861C070421

    Original file (2001059861C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Paragraph 4-24 provides the authority for PERSCOM to separate soldiers for physical disability with severance pay. Paragraph 3-4 states in effect that the service of a soldier who is discharged while in an entry level status will be uncharacterized.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080085C070215

    Original file (2002080085C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 18 July 1978, the applicant was separated from the service in an entry-level status under the provisions of paragraph 4-24b(3), Army Regulation (AR) 635-40 by reason of physical disability with severance pay. Orders Number 30-1, dated 25 February 1986, Department of the Army, Headquarters, United States Army Medical Department Activity, Fort Jackson, South Carolina,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001034

    Original file (20140001034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) the entry "Service-connected, received service-connected at 50-percent rating" vice "Disability, Existed Prior to Service, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)." Physical examination revealed no gross abnormalities: tenderness to palpation of the plantar fasciitis on the right foot...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011222C071029

    Original file (20060011222C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    John G. Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record shows the applicant's medical conditions were submitted to medical and physical evaluation boards for review. These were the correct separation code and the correct RE code to apply in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069269C070402

    Original file (2002069269C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB stated that the applicant was unfit for further military duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3, paragraph 3-32; and should be referred to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). In computing pay for disability with severance pay, a member with less than 6 months service cannot receive severance pay, and the member may apply to the VA for disability compensation. The MEB stated that the applicant was unfit for further military duty under the provisions of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023701

    Original file (20110023701.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    VASRD Code 5299 (Condition of the Skeletal System) analogous to code 5284 (Foot Injuries) rating guidance states to assign a 30% rating will be assigned if the condition is severe, a 20% rating will be assigned if the condition is moderately severe, and a 10% rating will be assigned if the condition is moderate. The PEB determined these conditions were unfitting and assigned a 10% disability rating for each condition and a combined disability rating of 20% under VASRD code 5299 analogous to...