Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007956
Original file (20090007956.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090007956 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he injured his knee after a kamikaze plane struck his ship on 22 November 1944.  The applicant states, "I was on the bow of the ship when the kamikaze plane hit the superstructure.  He had not released his bomb.  It threw me back.  My leg was injured at that time.  I got up.  Everybody was being evacuated to land.  We were placed in a cargo net to be moved on a landing barge.  As the cargo was lifted it came back and hit the USS Nelson.  This slammed my leg into the side of the ship injuring it again.  I did not complain.  About 10 days later it was swollen and I was treated.  I was taken to a hospital ship to be sent home."

3.  The applicant provides his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) with the period ending 13 November 1945 and a 7 page Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Appeal, dated 14 November 2008.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 


or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, this case is being considered using reconstructed records, which primarily consist of the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 and a VA Appeal, dated 14 November 2008.

3.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 with the ending period 13 November 1945 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 17 October 1942.  On 30 April 1943, he departed the United States for duty in the Asiatic Pacific Theater of Operations (APTO).  He arrived in the APTO on 5 June 1943.

4.  The applicant departed the APTO on 29 June 1945.  He was honorably discharged on 13 November 1945.

5.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 with the period ending 13 November 1945 does not show award of the Purple Heart.  Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action) contains the entry "None."

6.  There are no general orders available that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart.

7.  The applicant provided a VA Appeal, dated 14 November 2008.  In this appeal the VA reopened the applicant's claim for service connection for hearing loss.  The Appeal Board granted the applicant's claim based on a statement he provided as new evidence describing his exposure to a kamikaze attack aboard the USS Nelson in November 1944.  The applicant pointed out that he experienced hearing loss due to the explosion as well as an injury to his knee. 




8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  When contemplating an award of this decoration, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury.  The fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not sole justification for award.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s claim of entitlement to award of the Purple Heart for a leg injury he received while in the APTO was carefully considered.  It is clear that kamikaze pilots hurled their planes at many sea vessels during the war and the Board does not dispute that the applicant's vessel was hit by a kamikaze pilot's plane. 

2. However, there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided evidence that shows he received a leg injury that was a result of hostile action.  Unfortunately, the VA Appeal the applicant provided that indicates that he submitted a statement to the VA Board that he injured his knee from a kamikaze attack on while at sea alone is insufficient evidence to show he is authorized the award.  In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant granting the applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this 

case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007956





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007956



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010313

    Original file (20080010313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the FSM was a prisoner of war for two and a half years during his service in the Asiatic-Pacific Theater, therefore, he is entitled to award of the POW Medal and correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows the FSM was awarded the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the FSM the Purple Heart for wounds...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00899

    Original file (BC-2003-00899.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication of an aircraft accident and his being held prisoner of war (POW). The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 August 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. The applicant claims that his records are incomplete because they do not reflect an aircraft accident or that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015649

    Original file (20090015649.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. 18 April 1945: No mention of foot injury. Page 23: "A couple medics carried me back to the same first aid station that wrapped my foot 10 days ago. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in November 1944; and b. adding to item 33 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 the Purple Heart, Bronze Star Medal, Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp, and the World War II...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003949C070206

    Original file (20050003949C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. This regulation also provides that there is no statute of limitations on requests for award of the Purple Heart. There are no medical records that show the applicant was wounded, or treated for wounds, as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009102

    Original file (20070009102.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart be added to his WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge. Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action), of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55, shows the entry, "None." Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. awarding the applicant the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, with four bronze service stars, and the World War II...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080849C070215

    Original file (2002080849C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The back of the ship was not burning, so he walked to an area that had a life raft and waited for the call to abandon ship. He found out that other unit members burned in the sinking of LST 460 received Purple Hearts.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006501

    Original file (20090006501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was wounded in action multiple times but was never awarded the Purple Heart. However, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the Purple Heart in this case. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record, there is insufficient basis for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060114C070421

    Original file (2001060114C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded and issued the Glider Badge, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Purple Heart, the Army Good Conduct Medal, and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). While all six of his supporting letters substantiate that he injured his knee when his glider crashed, neither those statements nor his own statement of the incident indicates that the crash was the result of enemy action. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016666C071029

    Original file (20060016666C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006891C070206

    Original file (20050006891C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. However, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he was in fact wounded as a result of enemy action and that the wounds/injuries were treated by medical personnel and made a matter of record at the time. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.