Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007788
Original file (20090007788.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090007788 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his discharge with severance pay be changed to disability retirement.

2.  The applicant states he was discharged from the service due to an injury.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 13 December 2004.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 April 2004 for a period of 6 years.  He was transferred to Fort Benning, GA for basic combat training.

3.  On 1 May 2004, the applicant injured his right shoulder while doing duffle bag raises and other strenuous overhead calisthenics.  On 12 October 2004, this injury was determined to be incurred in line of duty.

4.  On 7 September 2004, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEBD) found the applicant did not meet medical retention standards for right suprascapular (situated or occurring superior to the scapula [shoulder blade]) neuropathy (an abnormal and usually degenerative state of the nervous system or nerves) and right shoulder pain.  The MEBD referred the applicant to a physical evaluation board (PEB) for these conditions.  The applicant indicated he did not desire to continue on active duty and he agreed with the MEBD's findings and recommendation.

5.  The Narrative Summary (NARSUM) to the applicant's MEBD stated there was an obvious loss of range of motion in the right shoulder due to the suprascapular neuropathy.  The NARSUM states his forward flexion of the right shoulder was 130 degrees and limited by pain and 140 degrees actively.  Abduction of the right shoulder was 105 degrees with pain at the limits.

6.  On 25 October 2004, an informal PEB found the applicant unfit for duty due to right shoulder pain with decreased range of motion secondary to right suprascapular injury with atrophy of suprascapular muscle, rated as moderate and noted he was right hand dominant.  He was given an analogous rating (8599) under Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) diagnostic code 8519 (paralysis of long thoracic nerve) of 10 percent.

7.  The PEB recommended a combined rating of 10 percent and that the applicant be separated with severance pay if otherwise qualified.  The applicant concurred with the findings and recommendation of the PEB and waived his right to a formal hearing in his case.

8.  On 13 December 2004, the applicant was discharged due to disability with severance pay.  He had completed 7 months and 24 days of active service that was characterized as honorable.

9.  A letter, dated 29 September 2009, from the ABCMR advised the applicant he had the option of applying to the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR).  He was advised the PDBR was established to reassess the accuracy and fairness of the disability rating assigned to service members who were discharged since 11 September 2001 as unfit for continued military service with a combined rating of 20 percent or less and found ineligible for disability retirement.  He was advised he could apply to either the ABCMR or the PDBR; however, the decision of either board is final.  He was also advised that if he failed to respond with his election of which board he desired, the ABCMR would proceed with the processing of his case.  The applicant did not respond to this letter.

10.  Congress established the VASRD as the standard under which percentage rating decisions are to be made for disabled military personnel.  The VASRD, in effect at the time, showed that for diagnostic code 8519 the disability rating for moderate incomplete paralysis of the long thoracic nerve is 10 percent.  The disability rating for complete paralysis of the long thoracic nerve; inability to raise arm above shoulder level, winged scapula deformity is 30 percent.

11.  Title 38 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 4.20, defines analogous ratings.  This Section states that when an unlisted condition is encountered it will be permissible to rate under a closely related disease or injury in which not only the function are affected, but the anatomical localization and symptomatology are closely analogous.

12.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rated at least 30 percent.

13.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation with severance pay of a member who has less than 20 years service and a disability rated at less than 30 percent.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In view of the applicant's failure to respond to ABCMR letter of 29 September 2009, his case was processed before the ABCMR as requested in his application.

2.  The applicant contends he should have received a medical retirement instead of a discharge with severance pay.

3.  The applicant agreed with the MEBD's findings and recommendation and he agreed with the findings and recommendation of the PEB.  He waived his right to a formal PEB.

4.  The findings and recommendations of the NARSUM and the PEB are consistent with a 10 percent disability rating for the applicant's right shoulder pain.  In order for him to receive a medical retirement he would have had to have been rated 30 percent for his condition.  A higher rating of 30 percent would require evidence showing he could not raise his right arm above his shoulder.  The NARSUM states his forward flexion of his right shoulder was 130 degrees and the abduction was 105 degrees.

5.  There is no evidence to support a 30 percent disability rating for the applicant's disability rating.  Therefore, the disability rating of 10 percent assigned by the PEB and his discharge with severance pay are determined to be correct.

6.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007788





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007788



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00131

    Original file (PD2013 00131.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded right shoulder pain s/p arthroscopic subacromial decompression and distal clavicle excision to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The MEB also identified and forwarded left ankle pain as medically acceptable.The PEBadjudicated the chronic right shoulder pain as unfitting, rated 0%with specified application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The left ankle pain condition was determined to meet retention standards and thereforewas...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00086

    Original file (PD 2013 00086.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board found that the abnormal EMG findings of the muscles innervated by C6-7 of the right upper extremity, right upper extremity weakness, scapular winging,numbness, pain upon use, tenderness and poor coordination, was ratableat 20% for slight impairment using this code. The Board found the neck and upper back pain, tenderness, paresthesias, abnormal EMG findings, and weakness were more compatible with a §4.124a rating for neurological conditions as an alternate code 8513 (paralysis of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01928

    Original file (PD-2013-01928.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Nerve studies (electromyelogram and nerve conduction) on 30 April 2003 were normal: “There is no evidence via electrodiagnostic parameters to suggest cervical radiculopathy, brachial plexopathy, thoracic outlet syndrome, ulnar neuropathy or median neuropathy.” On 24 May 2004, a neurologist reported that, “According to the patient, if he lifts his arms above his head or uses his arms, he will experience pain in his neck followed by numbness and tingling in his arms and sometimes weakness in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00130

    Original file (PD 2014 00130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board agreed that the evidence in the record at both the MEB and C&P examinations supported the 10% rating IAW VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) for painful limited arm motion that did not meet the threshold compensable rating of 20% for “limited motion at shoulder level.” Board practice when rating ascode 5201 has considered 90 degrees of abduction or flexion “shoulder level.” There was no evidence in record of any other ratable impairment of the shoulder or incapacitating episodesallow for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01327

    Original file (PD-2013-01327.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The examiner also noted the CI had 2 year history of neck and shoulder pain with decreased RUE strength and sensation, and decreased shoulder ROM.On the DD Form 2807,the CI reported neck pain since his fall in December...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02096

    Original file (PD-2014-02096.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left shoulder arthrography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the left shoulderwere normal.A neurologic physical examination in January 2006 reported findings suggestive of thoracic outlet syndrome (upper...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00017

    Original file (PD-2014-00017.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Right Shoulder Pain Condition . Both the PEB and VA rated the peripheral nerve condition using code 8722 at 10% (Neuralgia of the musculocutaneous nerve; “moderate”). Later VA ratings corrected the nerve code to 8517 for partial paralysis of the musculocutaneous nerve in the upper extremity.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02197

    Original file (PD-2013-02197.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI.The rating for the unfitting thoracic musculoskeletal condition is addressed below.The requested bilateral knee condition, lumbar spine condition, left hand ulnar nerve dysfunction and hypertension (determined to be not unfitting by the PEB) are also addressed below.The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012089

    Original file (20080012089.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, she had a hernia operation while serving in Kuwait which resulted in residual pain. The applicant provides: a. If the MEBD determines the Soldier does not meet retention standards, the board will recommend referral of the Soldier to a PEB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018505

    Original file (20080018505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As such, the PEB did not rate those conditions. Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 7-2, provides that an individual may be placed on the TDRL (for the maximum period of 5 years which is allowed by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1210) when it is determined that the individual’s physical disability is not stable and he or she may recover and be fit for duty, or the individual’s disability is not stable and the degree of severity may change within the next 5 years so as to change the disability...