Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006946
Original file (20090006946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		BOARD DATE:	  15 September 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090006946 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he was injured in combat operations while in Vietnam, that he was on a guard tower when he was hit with shrapnel from an exploded rocket, and that he was treated in the field by a medic and returned to duty.

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 1380 (U.S. Field Medical Card) in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 14 July 1967.  He arrived in Vietnam on 5 August 1968.  He served as an engine equipment repairman assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 52nd Signal Battalion, in Vietnam from 10 August 1968 through 7 October 1968.  He served as an engine equipment repairman and cable operator assigned to Company C, 52nd Signal Battalion, in Vietnam from 8 October 1968 through 27 June 1969.  On 8 July 1969, the applicant was released from active duty in the temporary rank of specialist four after completing 1 year, 11 months, and 25 days of creditable active service with no time lost.

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) as authorized awards.

4.  There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicant’s service personnel records.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.  However, a DD Form 1380, dated 21 April 1969, shows the applicant was treated for fragment wounds of the left wrist and index finger incurred as a result of hostile action during a mortar attack.

5.  Records show the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. 

6.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal.  His records show he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his service.

7.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command, and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

9.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations.  It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  At the time, a Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service except that a service school efficiency rating based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 was not disqualifying.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal, including the Vietnam Service Medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The DD Form 1380 which shows the applicant was treated for fragment wounds of the left wrist and index finger incurred as a result of hostile action during a mortar attack on 21 April 1969 in Vietnam is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart. 

2.  The applicant was separated in the temporary rank of specialist four with almost 2 years of creditable active service with no time lost.  It appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 14 July 1967 through 8 July 1969 based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award.

3.  The applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

4.  The Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was awarded to all units that served in Vietnam.  The applicant served in Vietnam during a qualifying period and is eligible for this award.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to add this foreign unit award to his DD Form 214.



BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 21 April 1969 in Vietnam;

	b.  awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 14 July 1967 through 8 July 1969; and 

	c.  adding the Purple Heart, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal to his DD Form 214.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090006946



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090006946



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003526

    Original file (20130003526.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the FSM received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout most of his active duty service and his record is void of any derogatory information or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for or awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 9 April 1968 to 22 September 1969 and to add this award to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015592

    Original file (20100015592.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's file contains no information that would have disqualified him for the Army Good Conduct Medal, therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009496

    Original file (20110009496.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to award him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 12 May 1969. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to award him a second Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 26 August 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 12 May 1969; b. awarding him the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009854

    Original file (20110009854.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 3 November 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110009854 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The DD Form 1380 shows the applicant was treated for a wound sustained as a result of enemy action on 21 April 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in action on 21 April 1969; b. deleting the awards currently shown on his DD Form 214; and c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020338

    Original file (20140020338.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available evidence shows the applicant served honorably from 9 August 1967 to 9 June 1969 and he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001002

    Original file (20130001002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 21 April 1967 through on or about 19 April 1968. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Purple Heart and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action on 5 April 1968; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024931

    Original file (20100024931.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in his military personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart during his period of service in Vietnam. Despite that there are no orders awarding him the Purple Heart, his former unit commander and a former service member confirmed the applicant was struck by shrapnel from a mortar round on 14 May 1969, in Vietnam, as a result of hostile action and received treatment by medical authorities. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005165C070205

    Original file (20060005165C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 22 September 1969. While the evidence of record is conflicting as to the date the applicant sustained this particular wound (i.e., 4 versus 14 September 1969), the evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded and received treatment for the wounds. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017792

    Original file (20100017792.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The DD Form 1380 the applicant provided confirms that on 28 December 1969, while serving in Vietnam, he was wounded in action by an enemy rocket and he was treated for those wounds by medical personnel. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091650C070212

    Original file (2003091650C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that the applicant was inducted in the Army of the United States on 28 January 1969. There is no evidence and the applicant provided none to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal and the Army Commendation Medal while he served on active duty. b. awarding the applicant the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars and adding these awards to Block 24 of his DD Form 214;