Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005922
Original file (20090005922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 September 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090005922 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his rank/grade at the time of his separation be restored to specialist (SPC)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he lost a child during his final day of honorable service.  He admits that he made a horrible mistake by smoking "pot" after the funeral.  The applicant states that he was reduced in rank and grade when he returned to his unit.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 18 June 1990.  He was discharged from the USAR DEP on 10 June 1991 and he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 11 June 1991.  He successfully completed basic combat and advanced individual training (AIT).  Upon completion of AIT, the applicant was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11H (Heavy Anti-Armor Weapons Infantryman).  At a later date, the applicant reclassified into MOS 13B (Cannon Crewmember).  The applicant was advanced to the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 on 11 August 1994 and that was the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.  However, at the time of his separation, the applicant held the rank/grade of private (PV2)/E-2 with an effective date of rank of 14 May 1996.

3.  On 12 March 1996, the applicant’s unit commander notified him, in effect, that he was initiating action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder.  The unit commander informed the applicant that he was recommending that the applicant receive a characterization of service of "honorable."  The commander also informed the applicant that the basis for his proposed action was that following consult with a mental health doctor, he was convinced that separation was in the best interest of the Army.  The commander also noted that the applicant had a long maladaptive behavior since junior high school and the fact that he was hospitalized at Fort Bragg, NC, for homicidal ideation towards his co-workers.  The commander also noted that on several occasions, the applicant had difficulty controlling his temper and behavior at work.  He then informed the applicant that the mental health doctor had opined that it was simply a matter of time before his ability to perform his duties would be affected and that the doctor did not believe he would respond to rehabilitative treatment.

4.  On 19 April 1996, the separation authority directed the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, for a personality disorder.  The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged from the military service and issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate.  The separation authority determined that the applicant had no potential for useful service under conditions of full mobilization and directed that he should not be transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR).

5.  On 29 May 1996, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Army.  Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) of the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued to him at the time of his separation shows the entry PV2 and Item 4b (Pay Grade) shows the entry E-2.


6.  The complete facts and circumstances of the applicant's reduction from the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 to PV2/E-2 are not contained in his available records.
The applicant's rank consistently appeared as SPC throughout his discharge packet.  The separation authority did not direct that the applicant be reduced in rank and grade.

7.  Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etcetera, of controlled substances) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) provides that any Soldier who wrongfully uses, possesses, manufactures, distributes, imports into the customs territory of the United States, exports from the United States, or introduces marijuana into an installation, vessel, vehicle, or aircraft used by or under the control of the armed forces shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

8.  Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice), in pertinent part, states that commanders may impose nonjudicial punishment for the administration of discipline under the provisions of Article 15 of the UCMJ.  Reduction in grade is listed among the punishments commanders are authorized to impose under the provisions of Article 15.  This regulation also stipulates that only one appeal is permissible under Article 15 proceedings.  An appeal not made within a reasonable time may be rejected as untimely by the superior authority.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) provides that Soldiers may be reduced in rank and grade as a result of misconduct in violation of the UCMJ.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his record should be corrected by restoring his rank/grade to SPC/E-4 at the time of his separation was carefully considered and determined to lack merit.

2.  By his own admission, the applicant abused a controlled substance, which was in violation of Article 112a of the UCMJ, during the final days of his active duty service and he was subsequently reduced in rank/grade as a result of this action

3.  Although the complete facts and circumstances of the applicant's reduction from the rank and grade of SPC/E-4 to PV2/E-2 are not contained in his available records, it is reasonable to presume his chain of command exercised its disciplinary authority prior to the applicant's discharge.

4.  The ABCMR operates under the standard of presumption of regularity in governmental affairs.  This standard states, in effect, that in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board must presume that all actions taken by the military were proper.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant was reduced in rank and grade from SPC/E-4 to PV2/E-2 as a result of his chain of command imposing punishment for his violation of the UCMJ.  Accordingly, it must also be presumed that it would not be appropriate under the circumstances in this case to grant the applicant's requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005922



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005922



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003939

    Original file (20140003939.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) by: a. revoking the DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 24 February 2012, which erroneously advanced him from the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1 to the rank/grade of private (PV2)/E-2 and removing it from his AMHRR; b. amending the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code for Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 4 April 2012, to show he held the rank/grade of private first class...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001195

    Original file (20110001195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he was reduced to PVT/E-1 on 2 February 1998 as a result of NJP. At the time the DA Form 4187 was prepared the applicant's rank was PVT/E-1. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting item 14 of his DD Form 214 to show he successfully completed AIT and he was awarded MOS 92A or that he was discharged in the rank of PFC/E-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015310

    Original file (20090015310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It indicates the applicant was still assigned as an AIT Soldier and was not MOS qualified due to not having taken the APFT for medical profile reasons. It states Soldiers pending referral to an MMRB, MEBD, or PEB will not be denied promotion if already promotable on the basis of medical disqualification if they are otherwise qualified for promotion. The evidence fails to show the applicant's medical processing was the sole basis for being denied promotion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006658C070205

    Original file (20060006658C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his pay grade on his DD Form 214 is incorrect and it reads pay grade, E-1; however, it should state a pay grade of E-2. The rank on the Article 15 should have read PFC/E-3 and punishment should have read reduction to pay grade E-2. The evidence of records shows that the applicant was advanced to pay grade E-3 effective 23 April 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018093

    Original file (20080018093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 12 November 1999, the applicant's immediate commander again dispatched a letter of instruction to the applicant informing him that he was absent from scheduled MUTA on 6 November 1999 and 7 November 1999. The record of unsatisfactory participation is correctly filed in his record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003944

    Original file (20140003944.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 November 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140003944 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably released from from the U.S. Marine Corps in 2003, in the grade of E-4, after completing 4 years of active duty with 2 days of lost time. The evidence shows he is entitled to correction of his separation orders, based on the operation of law, to show his entitlement to separation with disability severance pay in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010748

    Original file (20130010748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. In support of his application the applicant provides the following documents: a. a DA Form 2627-2, dated 8 February 2010, that shows the Commander, 43d Sustainment Brigade, Fort Carson, CO, set aside the punishment(s) of NJP imposed against the applicant on 8 August 2008 on the basis that "it is unclear if the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002932

    Original file (20120002932.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel further states: * the applicant received a field grade Article 15 while assigned to the 140th Movement Control Team (MCT), 57th Transportation Battalion, 593rd Sustainment Brigade (SB), based on allegations that he provided alcohol to a minor * the applicant disputed the allegations but his commanding officer, LTC JM, the battalion commander, found he committed misconduct and imposed a punishment of 30 days of extra duty and reduction to the rank/grade specialist (SPC)/E-4 – the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085053C070212

    Original file (2003085053C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to SPC with an effective date and with a date of rank of 1 November 1993. The applicant was reduced from PFC to private (PV2), pay grade E-2 with an effective date of 21 November 1996 and with a date of rank of 7 March 1991 by Company B, 898th Engineer Battalion Orders Number 4-1, dated 21 November 1996, for unsatisfactory participation. The applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard on 8 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019293

    Original file (20120019293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 * his last duty assignment and major command as the 411th Medical Company * the station where he separated as Savannah, GA * his character of service as honorable 2. His DD Form 214 shows he was released from active duty for training on 26 May 1989 by reason of completion of required active service with uncharacterized service. The...