Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005754
Original file (20090005754.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 September 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090005754 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states that he served in Vietnam and his military records show that he served there; however, the Army was not recording Vietnam service on the DD Form 214 when he was released from active duty (REFRAD).

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his application, a copy of his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 16 February 1967.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army and entered active duty for a period of 3 years on 17 February 1964.  Upon completion of training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 67Q (Single Engine-Single Rotor Helicopter Repairman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

   a.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) he served overseas in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 17 September 1964 through 8 October 1965.

   b.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments), in pertinent part, he was assigned to the 573rd Transportation Detachment (RVN) and served as a Single Engine Helicopter Mechanic from 19 September 1964 through 8 October 1965.
   
4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably REFRAD on
16 February 1967 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  At the time he had completed 3 years of net active service.
  
   a.  Item 22 (Statement of Service), block c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), shows he completed 1 year and 22 days of foreign service and contains the entry "FECOM" (i.e., Far East Command).
   
   b.  Item 30 (Remarks) does not contain an entry for Vietnam service.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribes policies and procedures regarding separation documents.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  This Army regulation states that the purpose of a separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service at the time of separation.  Therefore, it is important the information entered thereon is complete and accurate as of that date.

   a.  Section III (Instructions for Preparation and Distribution of the Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, that all available records will be used as a basis for the preparation of the DD Form 214, including the Enlisted Qualification Record, Officer Qualification Record, and orders.

   b.  Paragraph 51 (Item 22c), subparagraph b (Enlisted personnel), in pertinent part, states enter total active duty outside continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater where service was performed (e.g., "Foreign and/or Sea Service (USAREUR)").
   c.  Paragraph 62 (Item 30) states the "Remarks" section will be used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks.  There was no requirement to enter the inclusive dates of service in Vietnam during current period of service.

6.  As a matter of information related to this application, effective 2 January 1970, change 11 to Army Regulation 635-5 was implemented.  In pertinent part, this document instructed, "[e]nter inclusive dates of service in Vietnam during current period of service."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he served in Vietnam because this service was not recorded on the document; however, it became a regulatory requirement to record Vietnam service on the DD Form 214 subsequent to his separation from active duty.

2.  Records show the applicant served in the RVN from 17 September 1964 through 8 October 1965 and he was honorably REFRAD on 16 February 1967.

3.  The evidence of record shows a change to the Separation Documents regulation, subsequent to the applicant's REFRAD, implemented guidance to document the inclusive dates of service in Vietnam during the current period of service on the DD Form 214.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his service in Vietnam from 17 September 1964 through 8 October 1965.

BOARD VOTE:

____X__  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry, "SERVICE IN VIETNAM:
17 FEBRUARY 1964 - 8 OCTOBER 1965/ /NOTHING FOLLOWS."



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005754



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005754



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017986

    Original file (20130017986.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his foreign service in the RVN and his awards and decorations, as recommended below. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004727

    Original file (20120004727.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his foreign service in the RVN behind his awards was determined to be without merit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 29 January 1965 to 5 November 1967; b. adding the entry "USARPAC" to item 22c of his DD Form 214; c. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from item 24 of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030341

    Original file (20100030341.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army's awards policy. This service is not currently reflected in item 30 of his DD Form 214 and should be added at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying period of honorable service from 24 February 1964 to 23 February 1967; b. amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009446

    Original file (20100009446.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows, in Item 17 (Foreign Service), that he served in Vietnam during the period 30 June 1968 through 7 July 1969. As such, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 March 1972 to show the same correct service dates for his first completed tour in Vietnam. Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 March 1972 should be corrected to show he completed his first tour of duty in Vietnam during the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017569

    Original file (20140017569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant describes actions and circumstances surrounding the injuries he sustained: * on 20 (sic) April 1966, during a combat mission while serving as door gunner when enemy fire hit one of the outside M-60 gun barrels and shrapnel lodged in his right leg * on 18 May 1966, during a mortar and 75mm recoilless rifle attack on the base by the enemy when he was running to get his aircraft ready for immediate takeoff and he sustained a deep wound to his left foot a. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004204

    Original file (20130004204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards): a. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 26 June 1964 to 23 June 1967; b. adding in Item 26 of his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001256

    Original file (20130001256.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he would like his DD Form 214 to be an accurate record of his military service. It also shows in: a. item 22 (Statement of Service), block c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), the entry "Thailand" - 0 years, 11 months, and 17 days; and b. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized): * National Defense Service Medal * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14) Bar 6. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019976

    Original file (20130019976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for correction of records to show he performed temporary duty (TDY) in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) during the period 8 September 1966 to 20 December 1966. The applicant's request for correction of his records to show he performed TDY in the RVN during the period 8 September 1966 to 20 December 1966 was carefully reconsidered. However, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his records to show this period of foreign service in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021545

    Original file (20140021545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all awarded or authorized awards for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). Service medals and awards are not issued by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214, as previously...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001615

    Original file (20120001615.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. It states that all available records will be used as a basis for the preparation of the DD Form 214, including the Enlisted Qualification Record, Officer Qualification Record, and orders. The applicant served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service for the first award of the Army...