IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 6 OCTOBER 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090005727
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was posthumously promoted to master sergeant (MSG)/pay grade E-8.
2. The applicant states the FSM called her from Hawaii in October 1962 to tell her that he had been selected for promotion. Unfortunately, he became ill and he was medically evacuated from Hawaii to Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC. He was hospitalized, he did not to return to his unit, and he was never promoted. He was medically retired, and his health continued to decline and prevented him from performing any type of employment.
3. The applicant provides copies of the FSMs death certificate; Headquarters, Department of the Army Special Orders Number 171; four separation documents; a 1962 Certificate of Achievement; and a Certification of Military Service.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted,
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The FSM, a career Soldier, served on active duty for over 22 years. He was promoted to sergeant first class (SFC)/pay grade E-7 (temporary) on 15 March 1961. This promotion was made permanent effective 2 October 1962.
3. The available evidence shows that while performing duties in Hawaii, the FSM was referred to a medical board for evaluation of asthma and chronic bronchitis. He was transferred to Walter Reed General Hospital for further evaluation and treatment on 25 November 1962.
4. On 5 June 1963, a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) found the FSM to be medically unfit for duty and afforded him a 30 percent disability evaluation.
On 3 July 1963, his condition was determined to be permanent and it was directed that he be retired due to a physical disability.
5. Headquarters, Department of the Army Special Orders Number 171, dated 19 July 1963, separated the FSM from active duty and placed him on the Retired List due to physical disability in the rank of SFC/E-7.
6. The available record contains no evidence that the FSM had been selected for promotion to MSG/E-8 prior to discharge.
7. The FSM passed away on 31 January 1980.
8. Title 10, Section 3961(b), United States Code, states an enlisted Soldier will normally retire at the grade held on the date of retirement.
9. Army Regulation 624-200 (Promotions, Demotions, and Reductions Appointment and Reduction of Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 16a(8), then in effect, provided for a Soldier to be promoted in pay grades E-4 through E-9 if the Soldier was physically qualified to perform the duties of the MOS and grade to which the appointment was made. If a Soldier had physical limitations which prohibited effective performance of the duties of the MOS and grade the Soldier would not be appointed to the higher grade.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that in October 1962, the FSM informed her that he had been selected for promotion to MSG/E-8. However, he became ill and he was medically retired, but he was never promoted.
2. The FSM was temporarily promoted to SFC/E-7 on 15 March 1961 and the promotion was made permanent effective 2 October 1962. On 19 July 1963, the FSM was separated from active duty and placed on the Retired List due to physical disability in the rank of SFC/E-7 after completing over 22 years of service.
3. There is no evidence available to show the FSM was on the E-8 promotion list at the time of discharge or to corroborate the applicants contention. In addition, even if the FSM had been on an E-8 promotion list, because he was not physically qualified to perform his duties he could not have been promoted. Regrettably, there appears to be insufficient evident that would warrant granting the requested relief.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X_____ ____X____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _XXX______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090005727
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090005727
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005285
An AGUZ Form 658 (Determination of Grade for Retirement, Advancement, Separation or Retirement Pay), dated 14 May 1974, shows the FSM was promoted to MSGT (E-7) on 24 January 1953 and reduced to SFC (E-6) on 16 December 1957 (per orders). Records show the FSM held the grade of E-6 when he was retired from active duty on 31 May 1964 and he was placed on the Retired List in that grade. Records show the FSM was advanced on the Retired List to the grade of SFC (E-7), effective 16 May 1974,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000694
The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show he retired in the rank/pay grade of master sergeant (MSG)/E-8. These orders show the FSM's rank as M/Sgt and pay grade as E-7. The evidence of record clearly shows the FSM was promoted to the rank of M/Sgt in pay grade E-7 effective 11 September 1956.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000694
The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show he retired in the rank/pay grade of master sergeant (MSG)/E-8. These orders show the FSM's rank as M/Sgt and pay grade as E-7. The evidence of record clearly shows the FSM was promoted to the rank of M/Sgt in pay grade E-7 effective 11 September 1956.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005005
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant retired on 27 January 2005. As such, his DD Form 214 correctly listed his rank/grade of SSG/E-6 and his retirement orders correctly retired him in the higher grade.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008424C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that the retired pay grade of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to E-7. Therefore, there is no error or injustice related to the FSM’s retired grade of SFC/E-6 and no basis to changing it at this time. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 31 August 1964, the date of the FSM’s separation for retirement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003258
The applicant requests that the records of her late husband, the former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he was a master sergeant (MSG). He was then promoted to sergeant (temporary) on 7 May 1955, to sergeant first class (SFC) (both temporary and permanent) (pay grade E-6) on 21 August 1958, and to SFC (both temporary and permanent) (pay grade E-7) on 27 June 1966. The records conclusively show that the FSM was never promoted to the rank of MSG, pay grade E-8.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020074
The applicant requests the records of her late spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was promoted to sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7. Item 27 (Remarks) shows a copy of this document was sent to the Department of the Army for promotion consideration to SFC/E-7 by the promotion selection board on 23 July 1990. Army Regulations in effect at the time of the FSM's death provided for promotion of critically ill Soldiers who were formally selected for promotion by a DA...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000718
The applicant requests correction of his record to show he retired in the rank/grade of master sergeant (MSG)/E-8. The evidence shows the applicant was promoted to MSG effective 28 October 2013. There is no evidence of record that shows he was not eligible for promotion.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000676
The applicants available military personnel records are absent orders or any evidence to show he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal. Therefore, based on the available evidence, no action is required by the Board to correct the FSMs records to show these awards and decorations. There are no orders or other evidence in the FSMs available military personnel records that show the FSM was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005695C080410
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected by changing his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was promoted to the pay grade of E-7, and that he received the Purple Heart. The application for an identification card submitted by the applicant showing the FSM’s rank as sergeant first class (SFC) and his pay grade as E-7...