Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005384
Original file (20090005384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 August 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090005384 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect qualification with the .50 caliber machine gun, the M-79 grenade launcher, the 
M-69 flamethrower, the bazooka (rocket launcher), and the .45 caliber pistol.

2.  The applicant states he would be proud to wear all of his badges.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Records available to the Board indicate the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 23 April 1965.  While undergoing training he qualified as a sharpshooter with the M-16 automatic rifle and as a marksman with the M-14 rifle.  His records confirm award of the appropriate badges associated with those two weapons.  There is no indication he qualified with any other weapons while undergoing training.

3.  Following completion of training, the applicant was assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam where he was awarded, among other awards, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) and the Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).  There is no indication that he qualified with any additional weapons while in Vietnam.

4.  In December 1966 the applicant was reassigned to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, and on 21 April 1967 was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service.

5.  A basic marksmanship qualification badge is awarded to indicate the degree in which an individual, military or civilian, has qualified in a prescribed record course and an appropriate bar is furnished to denote each weapon with which he or she qualified.  Each bar will be attached to the basic badge that indicates the qualification last attained with the respective weapon.  Basic qualification badges are of three classes:  expert, sharpshooter, and marksman.  The only weapons for which component bars are authorized are in table 8–2 of Army Regulation 670-1 (Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia).  Basic marksmanship qualification badges are awarded to U.S. military and civilian personnel and to foreign military personnel who qualify as prescribed.  Any commander in the rank or position of lieutenant colonel or higher may make awards to members of the Armed Forces of the United States.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, which confirms that he qualified with any weapons beyond the M-14 rifle and the M-16 automatic rifle.  In the absence of such evidence there is no basis to add any additional marksmanship qualification badges to his records.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

4.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ____X___  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005384



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005384



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013956

    Original file (20080013956.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s records do not contain special orders that show he was awarded a Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar. Special orders show that the applicant was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60) which are not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these badges. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006894

    Original file (20120006894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on this information, the applicant's request for the Cold War Recognition Certificate will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings. Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). With respect to the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), this badge is recorded on his DA Form 2-1 and is already listed on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010701

    Original file (20140010701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) shows he was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) but does not list the Purple Heart, CIB, or any Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badges. The Board carefully considered the applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart and CIB, and correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol, Grenade, and Rocket Launcher Bars and various other awards to which he may be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008319

    Original file (20120008319.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for his first period of active duty from 1959 to 1962; and b. award of marksmanship qualification badges for the M-1, M-14, and M-16 rifles, M-60 machine gun, M-79 grenade launcher, and .45 caliber pistol. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004037

    Original file (20120004037.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the training and qualifications received during his military service should be recorded on his DD Form 214. Therefore, item 25 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this training. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) to item 24 of his DD Form 214 and b. adding the entry "Advanced Individual Training,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025307

    Original file (20100025307.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the U.S. Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show: * His social security number (SSN) as xxx-xx-32xx vs xxx-xx-23XX * Award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) * Award of the Purple Heart * Award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge 2. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Forms 214 dated 21 June 1970 and 12 November 1971 to show his SSN as xxx-xx-32xx. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005191

    Original file (20120005191.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show award of the Air Assault Badge and Army Good Conduct Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002281

    Original file (20140002281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * he tested M-14 rifles * he was on the pistol team * unspecified sharpshooter and expert marksmanship qualification badges * completion of airborne training * award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) 2. Since his DD Form 214 was amended to show marksmanship qualification badges and completion of airborne training, this portion of his request will not be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010733

    Original file (20130010733.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018363

    Original file (20130018363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect: a. his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine, Rifle (M-1, M-14, and M-15), Grenade Launcher, Rocket Launcher, and Pistol Bars; and b. award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for his service in Berlin. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1). _______ _ _x______...