Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004941
Original file (20090004941.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090004941 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reversal of the revocation of his retired pay.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he would like to appeal the decision that removed him from the Retired List because he was receiving medical disability severance pay.  He believes this decision was unjust for the following reasons:  his severance pay has been repaid from the disability compensation he received from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) for the past 12 years; and most people receiving severance pay have not completed more than 20 years of service.  The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that he was issued indicates in item 28 (narrative reason for separation) disability-severance pay, and he was still placed on the Retired List.  

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:  self-authored letter, dated 8 March 2009; United States Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) letter, dated 8 July 1997; DVA letter, dated 
6 August 1998; Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) letters, dated October through December 2008; United States Army Human Resources Command-St. Louis (HRC-St. Louis) letter and orders, dated 12 February 2009; and DD Form 214, dated 22 September 1997.  


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 25 June 1984, while serving in the United States Army Reserve (USAR), the applicant entered active duty in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status.  

2.  On 8 July 1997, the applicant was notified in an ARPERCEN memorandum that he had completed the required years of service necessary to be eligible to receive retired pay at age 60 upon application.  

3.  On 22 September 1997, the applicant was honorably discharged, in the rank of sergeant first class, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, by reason of disability with severance pay.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed a total of 13 years, 2 months, and 28 days of active military service and a total of 19 years, 8 months, and 2 days of inactive military service.  

4.  A DVA letter, dated 6 August 1998, shows the applicant was awarded monthly disability compensation in the amount of $391.00, on 1 October 1997, which was increased to $399.00, on 1 December 1997.  This DVA letter also indicates the applicant received $71,000.00 in disability severance pay and that his DVA compensation would be withheld until the full amount of severance pay was recovered.  

5.  An undated DFAS letter, believed to be issued in 2004, welcomed the applicant to the retired rolls.  A 21 October 2005 DFAS letter informed the applicant of how disability compensation would be paid in the future, and a 
12 December 2008 DFAS letter informed the applicant that a portion of his retired pay would be collected until the total $71,000.00 in severance pay was recouped. 

6.  On 12 February 2009, the applicant was informed in a letter from the Transitions and Separation Branch, HRC-St. Louis, that a review of his records revealed he received disability severance payment in the amount of $71,000.00 in September 1997, therefore, he was not entitled to retirement benefits.  Orders P11-489268 were published revoking the 1 November 2004 orders that originally placed the applicant on the Retired List.  The authority for this revocation was Title 10 of the United States Code, Section 12731.  


7.  Title 10 of the United States Code, Section 1213 (10 USC 1213) provides guidance on the effect of separation on benefits and claims.  It states, in pertinent part, that unless a person who has received disability severance pay again becomes a member of an armed force, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or the Public Health Service, he is not entitled to any payment from the armed force from which he was separated for, or arising out of, his service before separation, under any law administered by one of those services or for it by another of those services. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that it was unjust for him to be denied non-regular retirement and to receive retired pay at age 60 was carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2.  Under the provisions of 10 USC 1213, unless a person who has received disability severance pay again becomes a member of an armed force, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or the Public Health Service, he is not entitled to any payment from the armed force from which he was separated for, or arising out of, his service before separation, under any law administered by one of those services or for it by another of those services.  As a result, given the applicant received $71,000.00 of disability severance pay upon his discharge from active duty on 22 September 1997, he is not eligible to receive non-regular retirement benefits and/or retired pay at age 60. 

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  _X_____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004941



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004941



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011821

    Original file (20100011821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His USAR Personnel Command Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), dated 31 August 2010, shows that during all periods of service in the USAR, USNR, ARNG, and RA, he completed a combined total of 13 years, 6 months, and 18 days of qualifying service creditable toward nonregular retirement. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-1a, states that to be eligible for retired pay an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025246

    Original file (20100025246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    a. Paragraph 4-19 (PEB decisions - common criteria) states the DA Form 199 will inform the Soldier of legal or administrative requirements that impact on the SoldierÂ’s disability benefits in certain situations, such as when a Soldier has a rating of less than 30% and has at least 20 qualifying years for retirement for non-regular service: "You have the option of accepting discharge with disability severance pay and forfeiting retirement for non-regular service; or you may request transfer to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011906

    Original file (20100011906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the following documents: * DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits) * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * Twenty-Year Letter * Denial of retirement pay letter, dated 15 July 2008 * Various medical documents, consults, and records of medical care * List of medications COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Her pay records show she received $66,585.60 of tax-exempt disability severance pay. Although the applicant requested...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026196

    Original file (20100026196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant elected not to concur with the PEB's findings and recommendations and requested a formal hearing. b. the PEB also noted the applicant had a rating of less than 30% and at least 20 qualifying years of service for Reserve retirement under the provisions of chapter 67 of Title 10, U.S. Code (USC); therefore, he had the option of accepting disability severance pay and forfeiting his Reserve retirement pay, or he had the option of requesting a transfer to inactive Reserve status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006232

    Original file (20090006232.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-40 provides for the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform the military duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating because of a physical disability. Army Regulation 635-40 requires that when a Soldier has a rating of less than 30 percent and has at least 20 qualifying years for retirement for non-regular service the DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board [PEB] Proceedings) should have the entry: "You have the option of accepting...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010029

    Original file (20050010029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He believed his 20-year letter made him eligible for retired pay at age 60 and any disability granted by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) would be offset by that retired pay. In 1994, he requested the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to change his discharge with severance pay to a medical retirement. The applicant's contention that he was not counseled regarding the choices available to him at the time of his separation (in regard to accepting severance pay or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009294

    Original file (20090009294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This document also shows the applicant was advised to "explain that you were not properly briefed concerning the ramifications of accepting severance pay (loss of all benefits from the Armed Forces)" and "that you believed that when [the] VA withheld your VA disability payments until they equaled the amount of money you received in Army severance pay, you were paying back to the Army the severance pay." The Department of Defense (DoD) Finance Management Regulation (FMR), Volume 7A (Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017349C070206

    Original file (20050017349C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a NGB Form 22, with an effective date of 15 December 2003, which shows, in pertinent part, that at the time of the applicant's discharge she had completed a total of 19 years, 5 months, and 22 days service for retired pay. The evidence of records shows that the applicant completed her last 6 years of qualifying service as a member of the ARNG. The evidence of records also shows that, at the time of her discharge, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011275

    Original file (20100011275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically retired instead of honorably discharged with entitlement to severance pay. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he was medically retired instead of honorably released from active duty. The PEB did so and rated him at 20% for his low back condition.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009696

    Original file (20080009696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a supplemental letter, dated 12 May 2008; a letter from the Chief, Transition and Separations Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, dated 20 February 2008; a memorandum, Subject: Transfer to an Inactive Status or Discharge with Severance Pay, dated 14 January 1988; a memorandum, Subject: Review of Proceedings of Physical Evaluation Board, dated 11 August 1987; an extract from Army Regulation 635-40, dated 13 December 1985; his Notification of...