Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004521
Original file (20090004521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        21 July 2009  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090004521 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart (PH). 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), he was hit with debris/shrapnel and was treated by medical personnel.  He claims he was offered the PH at the time.  

3.  The applicant provides a Bronze Star Medal certificate and citation and a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) letter in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 24 October 1968, and he was awarded, held and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).  His record further shows he was promoted to specialist four (SP4) on 9 November 1969, and that this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty. 

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he served in the RVN from 12 April 1969 through 1 April 1970.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour he was assigned to Company E, 2nd Battalion, 501st Infantry Regiment from 28 April through 14 November 1969, performing duties in MOS 11C and to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 101st Airborne Division from 15 November 1969 through 28 March 1970, performing duties in MOS 94A as a waiter in the Commanding General's Mess.  

4.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank and Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the PH in the awards listed.  His record is void of any orders or other documents that show he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority.  He record is also void of any medical treatment records that show he was treated for a combat related wound by military medical personnel.

5.  On 22 October 1971, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), in the rank of SP4, after completing 2 years, 11 months, and 29 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued on the date of his REFRAD, as amended by a correction to his DD Form 214 (DD Form 215) issued on 16 July 2007, shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure:  National Defense Service Medal, Bronze Star Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars, RVN Campaign Medal with Device 1960, Meritorious Unit Commendation, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, Combat Infantryman Badge, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14 & M-16) Bar, and 2 Overseas Service Bars.  

6.  The applicant provides a BSM certificate and citation that show he was awarded the BSM for meritorious service in the RVN during the period 1 May 1969 through 28 February 1970.  These documents contain no reference to the applicant being wounded in action.  

7.  During the processing of this case, a member of the Boards staff reviewed the Department of the Army (DA) Vietnam Casualty Roster.  No entry pertaining to the applicant was found on this list of RVN casualties.  

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to award of the PH.  It states, in pertinent part, that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he is entitled to the PH based on being wounded in action in the RVN was carefully considered.  However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. 

2.  The BSM certificate and citation provided by the applicant confirm he received the BSM for his service in the RVN; however, these documents make no reference to him being wounded in action.  Item 40 of his DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action.  His record is also void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty, and it contains no medical treatment records that indicate he was ever treated for a combat-related wound while serving in the RVN.  

3.  Finally, the applicant's name is not included on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, the official DA list of RVN battle casualties.  Absent any evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded in action or treated for a combat-related wound while serving in the RVN, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case.  Therefore, absent any evidence of record to corroborate the applicant's claim, it would not be appropriate or serve the interest of all those who served in the RVN and who faced similar circumstances to support award of the PH. 

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement related to award of the PH.   

5.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action related to award of the PH in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  __X____  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004521



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004521



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080261C070215

    Original file (2002080261C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate that he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was recommended for or awarded the PH. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. During its...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006985

    Original file (20090006985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 40 of the record copy of the FSM's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41. The applicant provided a copy of page 4 of the FSM's DA Form 20 showing the FSM was awarded the PH and the BSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011044

    Original file (20090011044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on award of the PH and states, in pertinent part, that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006356C070206

    Original file (20050006356C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he believes he is entitled to award of the PH for a shrapnel fragment wound he received to his forehead while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or awarded the PH. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by showing his entitlement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002654

    Original file (20110002654.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His OMPF is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. 4 In addition, based on his service and campaign participation in the RVN, he is also entitled to the 3 bronze service stars with his already-awarded VSM, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation and none of these awards are currently listed on his DD Form 214. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008360

    Original file (20110008360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any documents or records showing the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the PH or a valor award by proper authority while serving in the RVN. It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015238

    Original file (20060015238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the applicant's request for the PH, the Board found no evidence of record to show that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. The applicant's record is void of any orders, or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or that show he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000822C070205

    Original file (20060000822C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He now requests to be awarded the PH for these wounds. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 4 bronze service stars with his Vietnam Service Medal; and by providing him a correction to his separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084994C070212

    Original file (2003084994C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the Board is only able to confirm his entitlement to the BSM with “V” Device. During the review of this case, the Board found the applicant is entitled to other awards that were not included in his record. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device; by awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005420

    Original file (20090005420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PH and BSM with "V" Device are not included in the list of awards contained in item 24 and there is no indication the applicant pursued award of the PH or BSM with "V" Device at any time prior to his separation from active duty. Further, there are no medical treatment records on file that show he was ever treated for a combat-related wound or injury while he was serving on active duty. Therefore, it would not be appropriate award the applicant the PH at this time.