Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004400
Original file (20090004400.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       23 NOVEMBER 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090004400 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Korean Service Medal (KSM).

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) should be enough information for the KSM. 

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, the DD Form 214 provided by the applicant is sufficient for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 2 December 1954.  He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 342.10 (cryptographic equipment repairer).  He was advanced to the rank/grade SP3/E-4, which is the highest rank/grade he held.  He was released from active duty on 9 November 1956 as an early separation of an overseas returnee.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 10 months and        23 days of foreign service, but the DD Form 214 does not identify the country of his foreign service.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows his last duty assignment and major command was the Headquarters Company, 304th Signal Battalion.  Historical information gathered online from the Korean War Educator (Army- Accounts of the Korean War) indicates the applicant's last unit of assignment was located in Korea during the time that he served overseas.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the KSM.  In pertinent part, the regulation states that the KSM is awarded for qualifying service in the theater of operations between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM).  Specified criteria for the award of the KDSM is as follows:  a) service members of the armed forces must have served in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea from 28 July 1954 through a future date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense;  b) the area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the Republic of Korea, and the contiguous water out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land and water areas;  c) service members must have been mobilized with units or assigned or attached to units operating in the area of eligibility and have been physically deployed in the area of eligibility for 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, states that for Item 24c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), enter the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Since the applicant did not serve in Korea between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954, he is not entitled to the KSM.

2.  At the time of the applicant's separation, there were no provisions to enter the foreign country or countries to which the separated Soldier had been assigned or deployed.  There were only provisions to enter the total amount of time served outside the continental limits of the United States.

3.  While the applicant did not request the award by name, it is entirely possible he is asking for the KDSM instead of the KSM.  Evidence found online indicates the applicant's last unit of assignment was located in Korea during his period of overseas service.  Therefore, sufficient evidence is available indicating the applicant served in Korea well over 30 consecutive days after 28 July 1954 and is entitled to the KDSM.  As such, it would be appropriate to add this award to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the KDSM to his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding the KSM to his DD Form 214.




      _________XXX_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004400



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004400


3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019412

    Original file (20080019412.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to add the Korean Service Medal (KSM) and to show credit for his foreign service in Korea. The applicant states that although he served in Korea he was never awarded the KSM or given any credit on his DD Form 214 for his foreign service. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, states that for Item 24c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), enter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011359

    Original file (20100011359.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. The applicant had more than a year of foreign service and served in a unit assigned to Korea during the period of eligibility for the KDSM. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017063C070206

    Original file (20050017063C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Separation Document (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his service in Korea, and that he be awarded the Korean Service Medal (KSM). Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice related to documenting his Korea service on his DD Form 214 and award of the KSM now under consideration on 9 February 1960, the date of his separation from active duty. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018179

    Original file (20140018179.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded a service medal based on his service in Korea. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards states that the Korean Service Medal was awarded for qualifying service in the theater of operations between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954. His records show he served in Korea for approximately one year during the period of eligibility for the KDSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001742

    Original file (20090001742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM), Korean Service Medal (KSM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), United Nations Service Medal (UNSM), and any other overseas service medal that he may be entitled to receive. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006793

    Original file (20080006793.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 dated 31 August 1969 be corrected to reflect all of his authorized awards, including the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) he received at the time of his retirement and that all of his foreign service be added as well. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003123

    Original file (20150003123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) (3rd Award) * Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) * Global War on Terrorism Service Medal (GWOTSM) * Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) 2. The Gulf War Deployment Roster is a record of Soldiers who participated in Desert Shield/Storm and served in Southwest Asia in support of military operations during the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013122

    Original file (20100013122.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the KDSM is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. The FSM was awarded the VSM, and his records show he participated in four campaigns while serving in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the KSM, but does not show he received campaign credit for service in Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013685

    Original file (20110013685.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 18 December 2003, he was ordered to active duty as a member of his TNARNG unit in support of OIF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 13 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 29 April 2005 the: * Korean Service Medal * War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal * War on Terrorism Service Medal *...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01943

    Original file (BC-2013-01943.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His foreign service time to South Korea be documented on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...