Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004222
Original file (20090004222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	9 July 2009  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090004222 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B1O (light weapons infantryman) instead of 71B2O (clerk typist).

2.  The applicant states this item is incorrect due to a clerical error.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214; an appointment/promotion order, dated 14 April 1970; and an appointment/promotion order, dated 11 September 1970, in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 June 1969.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded the MOS 11B (light weapons infantryman).  The highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was specialist/pay grade E-4.

3.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Medical Department Activity Special Orders Number 176 Extract, dated 11 September 1970, awarded the applicant the primary MOS 71B2O and withdrew primary MOS 11B1O effective 11 September 1970.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) on 24 June 1971 after completing 2 years of active military service.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The regulation in effect at the time stated that block 23a would contain the primary MOS code number and title.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was initially trained in and was awarded MOS 11B as his primary MOS.  However, MOS 11B was later withdrawn and he was awarded the primary MOS 71B.  Therefore, at the time his DD Form 214 was completed, it correctly showed his primary MOS code number and title as 71B clerk typist.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004222



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004222



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014074

    Original file (20130014074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests his military occupational specialty (MOS) be changed on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) from 71B2O (Clerk Typist) to 11B2O (Infantryman). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of record shows the applicant attended AIT and was awarded MOS 11B on 9 April 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016888

    Original file (20080016888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s military personnel records did not contain any orders for awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Therefore, the evidence of record fails to support the applicant’s claim to the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009247

    Original file (20140009247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he is a Vietnam veteran * he served with the 101st Airborne Division * his BSM is not listed on his DD Form 214 * his secondary MOS (SMOS) of 71B (Clerk-Typist) is on his DD Form 214, but his PMOS of 11B is not listed * he believes that he is entitled to the CIB * there may be other division citations that are not listed on his DD Form 214 3. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028355

    Original file (20100028355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was awarded MOS 71B (clerk typist) on 13 August 1971. The evidence of record shows he was initially trained in MOS 71B and that he was awarded MOS 71B as his primary MOS while serving on active duty. Therefore, at the time his DD Form 214 was completed and issued, it correctly showed his primary specialty number and title as 71B, clerk typist.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002703

    Original file (20130002703.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states her MOS was changed to 71L when she was promoted to the rank/pay grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5, but her DD Form 214 does not reflect that change. The evidence shows the applicant was selected for promotion in CPMOS 71L on 9 September 1970 and was subsequently promoted to SP5/E-5 in MOS 71L on 8 December 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007236

    Original file (20080007236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as "71B3O" instead of "71B2O." The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 17 August 1970, and a copy of DA Form 87 (Certificate of Training), dated 15 March 1968, showing completion of MOS 71B3O, in support of his request. Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 17 August 1970, shows the entry "71B2O Clerk Typist."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007933

    Original file (20120007933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 95C (Corrections Specialist) and his service in Vietnam. His DD Form 214 shows he had completed 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of total active service. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110003811 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015889

    Original file (20070015889.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 22 (MOS's) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows that he was awarded a Primary MOS of 11B1O on 10 March 1967 [upon completion of Advanced Individual Training]. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant held a primary MOS of an infantryman when he reported for duty in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010632C070208

    Original file (20040010632C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. It further stated that consideration would be given to duties normally associated with the MOS and not limited to duties currently performed by individual in the present duty assignment. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was awarded PMOS "11B1P" upon completion of AIT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020197

    Original file (20110020197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the evidence of record shows he held an administrative MOS and served with his infantry battalion as a clerk typist. There is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit evidence that shows he held an infantry MOS or that he was personally present and under hostile fire while serving in his assigned infantry duty, in an infantry unit that was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. Regretfully, in the absence of conclusive evidence that the applicant held...