Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004164
Original file (20090004164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	24 September 2009  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090004164 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he is reinstated in the "High-Three" retirement system based on the erroneous allocation of his career status bonus (CSB).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the CSB he received was improperly allocated.  He claims that the percentage of his CSB allocated to the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) was incorrectly entered as 5 percent by a finance clerk instead of 75 percent as he requested.  He claims this resulted in his losing several thousands of dollars to taxes.  He also claims that a local finance official wrongly informed him that the maximum allowable deferment into the TSP was 100 percent.  As a result of this erroneous information, he elected to enter the reduced retirement (REDUX) program and receive the CSB.  He states that not only was he incorrectly informed of the maximum allowable percentage he could put in TSP, the local finance officials also input the wrong amount.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored memorandum and the 17 enclosures listed in his memorandum in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 19 July 2002, the applicant completed a CSB election in which he requested a lump sum payment of the $30,000.00 bonus.

2.  On 29 July 2002, the applicant completed a TSP-U-1 (Thrift Savings Plan Election Form) in which he requested a 2 percent contribution from his basic pay and a 75 percent contribution from his bonus pay.

3.  Page 2 (Information and Instructions) of the TSP-U-1 provided information and instructions on the TSP and instructions for completing the form.  Section II contains guidance on completing items 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the form.  The instructions for item 7 (percentage of basic pay per pay period) stated that the member could contribute up to the limits specified below (but could not exceed the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) annual limits).  It outlined the annual limits by year and indicated that for pay periods beginning in 2004, the maximum contribution allowed from basic pay was 9 percent.  The instructions for items 8, 9, and 10 stated that if a member elected to contribute from basic pay, he or she could also elect to contribute from 1 percent to 100 percent of any special pay, incentive pay, or bonus received (but the total contributions for the year could not exceed the IRC limits).  It further indicated that IRC, section 402g and section 415(c), could limit annual contributions.

4.  The applicant's leave and earnings statement for the month of January 2003 shows he was paid the $30,000 CSB and that $1,559.81 (5 percent) was deducted as a TSP contribution.  It also shows that $7,823. 89 was deducted for Federal taxes and $2,110.39 was deducted for State taxes.

5.  On 17 June 2008, the State of Arkansas Adjutant General notified the applicant that he had reviewed the applicant's request for reinstatement in the
"High-Three" retirement system versus the REDUX election he made in September 2002 and concluded he did not have the authority to allow a change to his election.  He indicated that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service was working to correct the TSP issue; however, regardless of the TSP election he made, the law limited the maximum annual amount of a TSP contribution, which prohibited the TSP election amount he requested.

6.  On 21 September 2006, the applicant's original application was returned without referral to the Board in order for him to exhaust all administrative remedies.  In the letter returning his case, the applicant was advised that if he reapplied, he should acknowledge that if the Board recommended his reinstatement to the "High Three" retirement system, it could entail a recoupment of his CSB.  In his latest application, the applicant has again requested both reinstatement to the "High Three" retirement system and retention of his CSB.  He has failed to accept or concur with recoupment of his CSB in conjunction with return to the "High Three" retirement system.

7.  Title 37, U.S. Code, section 322, provides the legal authority for the 15-year CSB for members entering service on or after 1 August 1986.  It states, in pertinent part, that the Secretary concerned shall pay a bonus to an eligible career bonus member if the member elects to receive the bonus under this section of law and executes a written agreement to remain continuously on active duty until the member has completed 20 years of active duty service.  The bonus authorized under this section is $30,000.00 which the member may elect to receive in a single lump sum payment, two installments, three installments, four installments, or five installments.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his record should be corrected to show he is reinstated in the "High-Three" retirement system based on the erroneous allocation of his CSB was carefully considered.  However, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant voluntarily elected to receive the CSB and reduced retired pay in a CSB election form he completed on 19 July 2002.  The applicant provides page 1 of a TSP election form, dated 29 July 2002, which shows he elected a 2 percent basic pay TSP contribution and a 75 percent contribution of his CSB.  However, he failed to provide page 2 (information and instructions) of this form.

3.  Page 2 of the TSP election form completed by the applicant contained information instructions on completing the form and contribution rules.  Section II contained guidance and instructions for completing items 7, 8, 9, and 10 which relate to basic pay, incentive pay, special pay, or bonus pay contributions.  The instructions specifically stated that the IRS code maximum annual contribution limit for 2004 was 9 percent.  It further stated that a member could contribute from 1 percent to 100 percent of any incentive and special pay, including bonus pay received; however, the total contributions for the year could not exceed the IRC limits.  As a result, notwithstanding what contributions were ultimately made, the applicant knew or should have known his contributions were limited by law.

4.  Further, the applicant received the CSB and had access to and use of the bonus money not contributed to TSP or deducted for taxes and was ultimately responsible for the allocation and use of his bonus money, to include payment of taxes, in spite of any erroneous counseling he may have received.

5.  Given there may have been errors in the counseling the applicant received and the TSP contribution allocations, equity relief to change the applicant's retirement system back to the "High Three" retirement system may have been supportable had the applicant agreed to recoupment of the CSB bonus he received.  However, given he has not agreed to this and has taken the position he should be allowed to keep his bonus and revert to the "High-Three" retirement system, this relief would result in a windfall to the applicant and would not be appropriate.  As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x____________
                   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004164



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004164



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2006-080

    Original file (2006-080.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant the applicant’s request because the record supports his allegation of error. Although the applicant took the proper steps to have 100% of the bonus paid into his TSP account, the JAG stated that the Coast Guard erred by paying only 10% of the installment into his TSP account. However, the Coast Guard erred by depositing only 10% of the CSB installment, rather than 100%, into the applicant’s TSP account.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03795

    Original file (BC-2002-03795.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further indicated that if she needed the money faster, she should find alternate funds and request a cancellation of the REDUX bonus. On 23 August 2002 applicant elected to accept and receive the High-3/REDUX retirement option, which resulted in her receiving a $30,000 lump-sum bonus upon reaching her 15-year point of active service. Once a member makes an election, the choice is irrevocable as stated on the DD Form 2839, CSB Election, Section IV, #12, “…I understand that once the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01298

    Original file (BC-2003-01298.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    During this timeframe, DFAS informed the MPF the applicant could not receive a 2002 TSP payment since his request for a bonus to be distributed in TSP was not established until 2003. The applicant requests a CSB installment payment in the amount of $10,000 be applied retroactively to his TSP account effective 23 Oct 02, along with any interest he may have accrued. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022084

    Original file (20100022084.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His letter states: * the applicant completed his DD Form 2839 on 28 July 2009 prior to his deployment to Iraq * the applicant had not completed 15 years of active duty and was [not] eligible to receive the $30,000.00 bonus "until" 16 September "2009" * while in Iraq the applicant contacted the RSO to submit his CSB * the applicant dated his DD Form 2839 28 July 2009 * the applicant and RSO understood as long as he was in a combat zone his entire CSB would be tax free * the applicant should...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002657

    Original file (20140002657.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that: * the effective date on his DD Form 2839 (Career Status Bonus (CSB) Election) be changed to the date of his deployment in Afghanistan * he be refunded the $7,500 tax deducted from his CSB 2. Personnel will include procedures for electing the CSB and an explanation of the effect that electing the CSB will have on the computation of retired pay if and when the Soldier becomes eligible, (2) Step 2 - Responsibility: Soldier - Soldier has 6 months to decide to either...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009803

    Original file (20110009803.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the date on his DD Form 2839 (Career Status Bonus (CSB) Election) be changed thereby allowing him to receive a CSB. Army Regulation 600-8-7 (Retirement Services Program), Section IV clearly stated that eligible Soldiers have 6 months from the date of notification to decide to either remain under the High-3 retirement plan or elect CSB/REDUX [Reduced Retired]; c. the applicant was informed that if the date of election on his form was correct, his election was past the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023385

    Original file (20100023385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she signed her DD Form 2839 on 11 December 2008 when she was in Kuwait; however, the form had been filled out and dated prior to the date that she actually signed it. During the processing of this case, an Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) staff member contacted the applicant to obtain a copy of her DD Form 2839 and any relevant documents that provide evidence of her dates of service in a HF/IDP area. The tax exemption is based on two dates instead...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05053

    Original file (BC-2011-05053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post 9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post 9/11 benefits to their dependents On 18 Feb 11, the applicant acknowledged and electronically signed the Post...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005115

    Original file (20150005115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of his Medical Additional Special Pay (MASP) for physicians for the year 10 July 2014 through 9 July 2015. The applicant is requesting full payment of a 1-year MASP contract at $15,000/year effective 10 July 2014 through 9 July 2015. OTSG rejected the MASP contract, incorrectly stating he was not eligible for any MASP payment since his retirement date was 25 June 2015 and he would not be able to complete the entire year.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083653C070212

    Original file (2003083653C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The memorandum indicated that those soldiers who erroneously received the CSB did not initially enter military service on or after 1 August 1986; therefore under the law, they are not eligible to elect for the bonus or for participation in the REDUX that accompanied the CSB. In this, the DIEMS date is the date the soldier enlisted in the DEP, not the date the soldier came on active duty. Thus the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to void the applicant’s enlistment in the DEP on...