IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 27 August 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004126
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, issuance of Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (15 Year Letter).
2. The applicant states, in effect, he never received a 15 Year Letter.
3. The applicant provides an Army National Guard (ARNG) retirement points history statement, DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), active duty retirement orders, and ARNG discharge orders in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant's records show while serving as a member of the New York ARNG, in the rank of sergeant (SGT), the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) on 15 May 2004.
2. On 14 December 2007, orders were issued at Fort Dix, New Jersey which directed the applicant's release from active duty (REFRAD), on 27 January 2008, by reason of physical disability-temporary, and placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), on 28 January 2008. These orders indicate the applicant's disability was based on a combat related injury or disease he received in the line of duty. He was also assigned a 40 percent (%) disability rating.
3. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his REFRAD on 27 January 2008 shows he was honorably separated after completing a total of 5 years,
7 months, and 14 days of active duty service and he had completed a total of
15 years, 8 months, and 10 days of prior inactive service. It also shows he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 2-24B(2) and that he was placed on the TDRL in the rank of SGT.
4. During the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the office of the Chief, Personnel Division, NGB and the recommendation is that the applicant's request be denied based on his current status on the TDRL. NGB officials indicate, in effect, that under the governing regulation, a Soldier on the TDRL must undergo periodic medical examination and review by a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) at least once every 18 months to determine if there is any change in the temporary disability that resulted in placement on the TDRL. During these reexaminations, a Soldier may be found fit and be required to return to duty. Therefore, the issuance of a 15-Year Letter would not be appropriate until the applicants permanent status is determined through medical channels.
5. The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion, on 25 June 2009, for him to have the opportunity to reply to or rebut the contents. To date, he has failed to respond.
6. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating.
7. Paragraph 3-4 of the same regulation provides that to be eligible to receive retirement and severance pay benefits, a disability must have been incurred or aggravated while the Soldier was entitled to basic pay or as the proximate cause of performing active duty or inactive duty training.
8. Chapter 4 of the same regulation contains guidance on processing through the PDES, which includes the convening of an MEB to document a Soldier's medical status and duty limitations insofar as duty is affected by the Soldier's status. If the MEB determines a Soldier does not meet retention standards, the case will be referred to a PEB. The PEB evaluates all cases of physical disability, and equitably for the Soldier and the Army. The PEB investigates the nature, cause, degree of severity, and probable permanency of the disability of a Soldier referred to the board. The PEB evaluates the physical condition of the Soldier against the physical requirements of the Soldier's particular office, grade, rank, or rating. Finally, the PEB makes a finding and recommendation required by law to establish the eligibility of a Soldier to be separated or retired because of a physical disability.
9. Paragraph 3-9 of the same regulation provides that the TDRL is used in the nature of a "pending list." It provides a safeguard for the Government against permanently retiring a Soldier who can later fully recover, or nearly recover, from the disability causing him or her to be unfit. Conversely, the TDRL safeguards the Soldier from being permanently retired with a condition that may reasonably be expected to develop into a more serious permanent disability. Requirements for placement on the TDRL are the same as for permanent retirement. The
Soldier must be unfit to perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating at the time of evaluation. The disability must be rated at a minimum of
30 percent or the Soldier must have 20 years of service computed under Title 10, U. S. Code, Section 1208, (10 USC 1208). In addition, the condition must be determined to be temporary or unstable.
10. Paragraph 7-4 of the same regulation states, in pertinent part, that a Soldier on the TDRL must undergo a periodic medical examination and PEB evaluation at least once every 18 months to decide whether a change has occurred in the disability for which the Soldier was temporarily retired.
11. Title 10 of the United States Code, section 12731 provides the legal authority for age and service requirements for non-regular retired pay. It states, in pertinent part, that members are entitled to retired pay when they are at least
60 years of age and have performed at least 20 years of service. Section 12731b provides the special rule that allows members with physical disabilities not incurred in the line of duty entitlement to early non-regular retirement. It states, in pertinent part, that a member of the Selected Reserve of a Reserve Component who no longer meet the qualifications for membership in the Selected Reserve solely because the member is unfit due to physical disability, may be treated as having met the service requirements for non-regular retirement if the member completed at least 15 years and less than 20 years of service.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that he should be issued a 15 Year Letter has been carefully considered. However, the evidence of record confirms the applicant was REFRAD by reason of temporary disability, on 27 January 2008, and placed on the TDRL with a 40% disability rating on 28 January 2008. While he is on the TDRL, he is subject to periodic reexamination and PEB reviews that could result in a change in his disability status.
2. The applicant is advised that once a final determination has been made on his disability status by proper medical authorities through the PEB process, he will be presented his options for permanent retirement, restoration to duty, or separation with severance pay. Because the applicant's medical condition was incurred in the line of duty (otherwise he would not have been eligible for processing through the PDES), he will not be entitled to non-regular retired pay at age 60 (15 Year Letter) as he was mistakenly informed in the NGB advisory opinion.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ____X___ ___X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090004126
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090004126
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010009
He was considered by a PEB on 2 May 1975 and determined to be physically unfit with a combined rating of 100% disabled and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with reexamination in October 1976. The recommendation of the PEB was approved by the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) and, on 12 October 1978, Orders D199-17, published by the US Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria, VA, removed him from the TDRL and discharged him from the Army because of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013523
The applicant was informed that since he was on the TDRL, the PDA did not have the authority to correct his records. Specifically, it states that when a mental disorder that develops in service as a result of a highly stressful event is severe enough to bring about the veterans release from active military service, the rating agency shall assign an evaluation of not less than 50 percent and schedule an examination within the six-month period following the veterans discharge to determine...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016566
The applicant requests, in effect, that the record be corrected to show he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and medically retired. The applicant provided a rebuttal to the advisory opinion on 21 May 2010, in effect, maintaining his original contention that he: a. was recommended by the medical officer for placement on the TDRL to determine the specific type of myopathy he suffered from; b. attempted to appeal the PEB findings but was denied travel to the board due...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017044
The applicant provides: * his MEB with Narrative Summary (NARSUM) * his PEB * service medical records * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical records and rating decisions COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, medical authorities obviously determined they were not sufficiently disabling to warrant evaluation; therefore, they were not placed on the MEB as medical conditions or defects to be evaluated. The Army rates only conditions that are determined to be physically...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024892
On 2 April 2010, the applicant was removed from the TDRL and discharged from the service with severance pay because of permanent physical disability with a disability rating of 20%. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Although the applicant was properly...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016071
The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) on 29 October 2008 with an increased disability rating instead of being discharged by reason of disability with severance pay on the same date. The applicant's record contains a DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) that shows a PEB evaluated the applicant's case at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, on 11 July 2008. Based on the available...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008736
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was rated with a higher percentage of disability and placed on the permanent disability retired list. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably retired on 30 August 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24e(2), based on physical disability: temporary. The evidence of record also shows that, based on a periodic physical examination, a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001231
The PEB found the applicant's conditions prevented her from performing the duties required of her grade and military specialty and determined that the applicant was physically unfit due to degenerative arthritis. The applicant is entitled to correction of her records to show PTSD, chronic, as a disabling condition that did not meet retention standards, effective 20 February 2008, the date of her original discharge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016541
The applicant requests, in effect, that his Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) results be amended to show 50 percent disability, that his discharge for a combat-related disability be voided, and that he be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and reevaluated by appropriate medical authorities. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004093
The MEB recommended the applicant's referral to a physical evaluation board (PEB). The applicant is entitled to correction of her records to show, in addition to intervertebral lumbar disc disease as a disabling condition and rated at 20%; PTSD, chronic, also as a disabling condition that did not meet retention standards, effective 8 January 2012, the date of her original discharge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...