Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004091
Original file (20090004091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	         23 July 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090004091 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Air Assault Badge.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the Air Assault Badge should be awarded to him retroactively from April 1974.  He states that he served with B Company, 101st Aviation Battalion, 101st Airborne Division.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 3 June 1965, 3 June 1969, 12 March 1975, and 30 June 1983; and a copy of an article from the Army Times.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 3 June 1963, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Raleigh, North Carolina, for 3 years, in the pay grade of E-1.  He successfully completed his training as a light vehicle mechanic.  He remained on active duty through a series of reenlistments.

3.  While the applicant’s records do show that, on 21 August 1972, he was assigned to Company B, 101st Aviation Battalion, 101st Airborne Division, his records do not show that he satisfactorily completed an air assault training course according to the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command standardized Air Assault Core Program of Instruction, or that he completed the standard Air Assault Course while assigned or attached to the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) after 1 April 1974.

4.  After completing 20 years and 28 days of net active service, the applicant was honorably retired, on 30 June 1983, under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-200, chapter 12, upon completing sufficient service for retirement.

5.  The applicants various DD Forms 214 show that his awards include the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Rifle M-14), the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Rifle M-16), the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal w/Device 1960, the Air Medal with “V” Device and 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster, 6 Overseas Service Bars, the Bronze Star Medal, the Good Conduct Medal (6th Award), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with silver star, the Army Service Ribbon, the Army Commendation Medal, and the United States Army Gold Recruiter Badge.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), in pertinent part, sets forth requirements for award of the Air Assault Badge.  Award of the Air Assault Badge requires that an individual must have satisfactorily completed an air assault training course according to the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command standardized Air Assault Core Program of Instruction, or completed the standard Air Assault Course while assigned or attached to the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) after 1 April 1974.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he should be awarded the Air Assault Badge.  

2.  The applicant’s contentions were considered; however, the available evidence does not show he meets the criteria contained in the applicable regulation for award of the Air Assault Badge.

3.  While the applicant’s records do show that he was assigned to Company B, 101st Aviation Battalion, 101st Airborne Division, his records do not show that he satisfactorily completed an air assault training course according to the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command standardized Air Assault Core Program of Instruction, or that he completed the standard Air Assault Course while assigned or attached to the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) after 1 April 1974.

4.  The applicant has not established that he met the criteria contained in the applicable regulation to be awarded the Air Assault Badge.  Therefore, it would not be appropriate to award him the Air Assault Badge.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004091



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004091



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002879

    Original file (20140002879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Air Assault Badge * Army Good Conduct Medal * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar (.45 Caliber) * Unit Citation for his service in the 564th Military Police Company 2. His record is void of any evidence and he has not provided evidence that shows he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar (.45...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009089

    Original file (20120009089.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders for the Air Assault Badge in the applicant's service personnel records. There is also no evidence of record that shows he completed an Air Assault course. This document shows that during the time of the applicant’s assignment to 1st Battalion, 12th Cavalry the unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 9 August 1965 to 19 May 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 56, dated 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010448

    Original file (20100010448.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Air Assault Badge, Aircraft Crewman Badge, and the Overseas Service Ribbon for service in Honduras and Saudi Arabia. Permanent Orders 171-045, 101st Airborne Division, dated 20 June 1991, awarded the applicant the Air Medal for meritorious achievement on 24 February 1991. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show award of the Air Assault Badge, Aircraft Crewman Badge, and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004313

    Original file (20120004313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests reconsideration of award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he completed an air assault training course at any time during his service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009573C070208

    Original file (20040009573C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he participated in many combat assaults in Vietnam in the 101st Airborne Division and that he received the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Air Medal. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty); a citation for the Air Medal; a certificate of training for the 101st Screaming Eagle Combat Leaders Course Class; a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 3 October 1974; a DD Form 215, dated 21 August 2002; two photographs...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001591

    Original file (20110001591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show: * completion of Air Assault School * award of the Air Assault Badge * his rank/grade as corporal (CPL)/E-4 * he served as a squad leader in an anti-tank platoon 2. * Items 6a and 6b show the active duty rank and pay grade at time of the Soldier's separation; the rank is taken from the Soldier’s promotion/reduction orders * Item 7 shows the date of rank * Item 26 shows all awards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019439

    Original file (20100019439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Air Assault Badge. His 201 file (Military Personnel Records Jacket) is void of any documents indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the Air Assault Badge during his active duty tenure. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s service with the 1st Cavalry Division in the RVN ended in May 1967, and his service in the RVN with the 82nd Airborne Division ended in June 1968, prior to 1 April 1974, the date the badge was approved for Army-wide wear.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005699

    Original file (20090005699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the Jungle Operations Training Course (JOTC), the "Air Assault Wings" (i.e. Air Assault Badge), the "Airborne Wings" (i.e. the Parachutist Badge), and any other award to which he is entitled. There are no orders, certificates, citations or any other evidence in the applicant's available records showing he completed the JOTC, that he was awarded the Air Assault Badge, the Parachutist Badge,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013082

    Original file (20080013082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show the award of the Air Assault Badge. Award of the Air Assault Badge requires that an individual must have satisfactorily completed an air assault training course according to the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command standardized Air Assault Core Program of Instruction, or completed the standard Air Assault Course while assigned or attached to the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) after 1 April 1974. _______ _XXX _______...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007505

    Original file (20120007505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he completed an air assault training course at any time during his service. Evidence of record shows the applicant was initially awarded primary MOS 11H. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from item 24 of his DD Form 214; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period...