Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004083
Original file (20090004083.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	11 August 2009    

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090004083 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be paid the recouped portion of his prior service enlistment bonus.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that Department of the Army letters, in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210, state that once a Soldier is paid a bonus it will not be recouped.    

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); memoranda, dated 14 August 2008 and 8 October 2008; a Defense Finance and Accounting Service Military Leave and Earnings Statement; his enlistment contract; and orders in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having prior service in the Regular Army, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in pay grade E-5 on 8 September 2004 for a period of 
6 years.  He enlisted for a prior-service enlistment bonus ($5000).  

2.  The applicant was ordered to active duty on 19 January 2006 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  He served in Iraq from 14 March 2006 to 21 March 2007.  On 25 April 2007, he was released from active duty and transferred to the USAR to complete his remaining service obligation.   

3.  In support of his claim, the applicant provides memoranda pertaining to a change in policies governing bonus recoupment which grants authority to cancel bonus recoupment actions for USAR Soldiers entering the Active Component, Military Technician (MILTECH) program, Active Guard Reserve, or officer status.  The memoranda state, in pertinent part, that a Soldier who receives a bonus from one Military Department who is discharged for immediate enlistment or appointment in a Military Department for which no bonus or special pay is paid may be considered to have completed the full term of service in the former enlistment contract.  As a result, all bonus payments already paid, to include lump sums will be terminated but not be subject to recoupment.  This approval only applies to Soldiers who changed status on or after 8 April 2005.

4.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Incentives and Budget Branch, Enlisted Accessions Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, in Washington, D.C.  The opinion states that upon review of the applicant's case, he changed status from the USAR (Selected Reserve) to a MILTECH status on 27 May 2007.  Upon entry into MILTECH status a Selected Reserve member's enlistment bonus is terminated without recoupment.  The opinion states that USAR Finance, Fort McCoy reveals that the applicant's unit erred in reporting the transaction change from the Selected Reserve to MILTECH status.  As a result, the applicant was paid an erroneous additional payment of $416.66.  When the mistake was discovered, the $416.66 was subject to collection as a debt owed to the government.  Had the applicant's bonus been terminated on the correct date no collection would have occurred.  The applicant was not authorized the additional payment and it was correctly collected.  That office recommends that the applicant's request be denied.

5.  On 21 May 2009, a copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal.  The applicant did not respond within the given time frame.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 8 September 2004 for a prior service enlistment bonus.  The advisory opinion points out that the applicant changed status from USAR (Selected Reserve) to MILTECH on   27 May 2007 and that upon entry into a MILTECH status a Selected Reserve member's enlistment bonus is terminated without recoupment. 

2.  However, the advisory opinion also states that the applicant was erroneously paid $416.66 when his unit erred in reporting the status change to the USAR Finance at Fort McCoy.  When the mistake was discovered, the $416.66 was subject to collection as a debt owed to the government.  The advisory opinion further states that had the applicant's bonus been terminated on the correct date, no collection would have occurred (because the $416.66 would not have been paid to him.  

3.  Since the applicant was not authorized the additional pay ($416.66) because his prior service enlistment bonus was terminated upon his entry into a MILTECH status, recoupment of the additional pay was appropriate.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.    

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004083





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004083



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010820

    Original file (20110010820.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the remission/cancellation of her debt due to recoupment of her reenlistment bonus. On 6 February 2010, the State Incentive Manager submitted request for an exception to policy regarding the termination and recoupment of the applicantÂ’s bonus. In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 which recommends that the applicant be granted relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000713

    Original file (20070000713.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory opinion recommended that the applicant be granted relief and paid a pro-rated share of the initial $2,500.00 bonus based on the 1 year, 8 months and, 14 days of service that he served which was 57 percent of the initial three year period. Evidence of record shows that on 8 January 2001, the applicant enlisted in the USAR for a 6 year term of service for a bonus of $5,000.00 and his initial payment would be $2,500.00. However, the applicant is entitled to be paid a pro-rated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020070

    Original file (20140020070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy (ETP) to retain eligibility for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive for which he contracted when he extended his enlistment in the Virginia Army National Guard (VAARNG) on 20 January 2007. The applicant states the National Guard Bureau (NGB) denied his request for an ETP to retain his eligibility for the SLRP incentive due to the facts that: * he accepted an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position * the SLRP addendum to his extension...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027154

    Original file (20100027154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the processing of this case, on 20 May 2001, the NGB provided an advisory opinion recommending disapproval of the applicant's request for payment of a bonus. The advisory official notes the applicant initialed each section of Annex R to DA Form 4836 indicating she understood she would be terminated from bonus eligibility with recoupment if she accepted an AGR position prior to serving at least 6 months of her contract term. The applicant's enlistment extension bonus contract required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013888

    Original file (20090013888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 April 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013888 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that an Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1 Memorandum changed the policy governing bonus recoupment allowing Soldiers who transferred from the Selected Reserve (SELRES) to the Army Guard Reserve (AGR) on or after 8 April 2005 to be granted a waiver for the recoupment of reenlistment bonuses. The Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1 Memorandum,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013773

    Original file (20070013773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests he be paid the full amount of his prior service enlistment bonus (PSEB) of $5,000.00 and student loan repayment program (SLRP) incentive of $10,000.00 for his enlistment in the United States Army Reserve (USAR). Evidence of record shows that on 28 June 2002 the applicant enlisted in the USAR for a 6-year term of service for a $5,000.00 PSEB and a $10,000.00 SLRP incentive. Notwithstanding the fact the advisory opinion recommended the applicant be paid the full...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016516

    Original file (20110016516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of a $10,000 officer accession bonus (OAB). The applicant states: * He previously served in an enlisted status and received a reenlistment bonus but he was commissioned as an Adjutant General (AG) officer in April 2008 * He executed a contract wherein he agreed to serve for 6 years in return for a $10,000 OAB * He completed the Basic Officer Leader Course (BOLC), Phases II and III and as stipulated in his agreement and he met his obligation in September 2009 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019789

    Original file (20130019789.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy (ETP) to retain eligibility for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive written in her enlistment contract. The applicant states: * her enlistment contract outlined that the SLRP would be revoked if she took a new duty assignment as a technician or an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position * the National Guard Bureau (NGB) published Education and Incentives Operational Message (EIOM) 13-003 to provide instructions for ETP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015211

    Original file (20140015211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he enlisted in the Delaware Army National Guard (DEARNG) on 10 December 2008 and that Section VI (Remarks) of his DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) reflects his acceptance of both the Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) and the SLRP in conjunction with his enlistment. He attests that although SLRP documents were completed at the time of his enlistment and bonus control numbers were requested, they were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018053

    Original file (20100018053.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official stated that based on available information, there is no record that any requests to either recoup or cancel her debt was made by her command. The advisory official recommended granting her request and cancelling the bonus-related debt based on her medical condition at the time of separation and honorable discharge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing she was approved for...