Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003975
Original file (20090003975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	21 July 2009  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003975 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 3 July 1986, to show he served 14 days of foreign service in the Philippines in 1987. 

2.  The applicant states that his current DD Form 214 does not reflect his overseas service.  He adds that his unit was activated and was attached to the U.S. Marine Corps in the Philippines. 

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored letter, dated 5 February 2009; a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 3 July 1986; a copy of Annual Training Orders 206-1, issued by the Illinois Army National Guard (ILARNG), on 27 October 1987; and a copy of a letter, dated 29 March 2007, from the National Personnel Records Center, in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the ILARNG on 19 September 1985.  He was subsequently ordered to active duty for training (ADT), on 18 February 1986, completed basic combat and advanced individual training, and was awarded military occupational specialty 91A (Medical Specialist).  He was honorably released from ADT to the control of his ARNG unit on 3 July 1986. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 4 months and 16 days of creditable active service.  

3.  On 27 October 1987, the Military and Naval Department of the ILARNG published orders 206-1 ordering the applicant’s unit to annual training (AT) for a period of 14 days, from 7 to 20 November 1987, to provide troop augmentation to Company B, U.S. Marine Corps, Subic Bay, Republic of the Philippines.  

4.  The applicant’s records show he was honorably released from the ARNG on 1 October 1991.

5.  In a statement, dated 5 February 2009, the applicant requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his overseas service in the Philippines.  He adds that he was a member of a unit that was activated for this mission.  He also states that the use of commercial air transportation was authorized and that he wore civilian clothes upon arrival due to the hostile nature of the mission.  

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The DD Form 214 is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier’s service.  A DD Form 214 will be prepared for selected categories of military personnel including Reserve component (RC) Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous active duty for training (ADT), Full-Time National Guard Duty (FTNGD), active duty for special work (ADSW), temporary tours of active duty (TTAD), or Active Guard Reserve (AGR) service.  







DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends the period of AT served from 7 November 1987 to 20 November 1987 in the Philippines should be listed on his DD Form 214. 

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant entered active duty on 18 February 1986 and he was honorably released from active duty on 3 July 1986.  He was issued a DD Form 214 for this ADT period.  A little over a year later and as a member of his ARNG unit he was ordered to AT from 7 to 20 November 1987.  This period of AT was less than 90 days; therefore, the issuance of a DD Form 214 for this period was not warranted/required.  

3.  Additionally, the above period of service occurred outside the period covered by the DD Form 214 that was issued on 3 July 1986; therefore, this service cannot be entered on the previously-issued DD Form 214.  

4.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty (emphasis added).  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The DD Form 214 is not intended to have any legal effect on the termination of a Soldier’s service. 

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION








BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003975



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003975



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013819

    Original file (20090013819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he completed 34 weeks of active duty for training (ADT). On 11 June 1983, the U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, published Orders T-06-318967, ordering the applicant to ADT for a period of 61 days, effective 11 August 1983 (later amended to show 11 July 1983), completion of the Medical Services Officer Basic Course with attachment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009246

    Original file (20100009246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his 1981 under other than honorable conditions discharge from the Illinois Army National Guard (ILARNG) to an honorable discharge. On 4 September 1980, he was notified in writing of his unit commander’s intent to separate him from the ILARNG by reason of misconduct, under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (ARNG and Army Reserve Separation of Enlisted Personnel), chapter 7, under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012530

    Original file (20120012530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chapter 2 states: * Items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank/grade held at the time of separation * Item 12h shows the effective date of pay grade * Item 12c (Net Active Service During This Period) shows the total active duty completed between the date entered on active duty and the date separated from active duty * Item 13 shows awards and decorations * Item 14 shows formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011335

    Original file (20140011335.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Retired Orders Number C-05-494313 and amendment * DA Form 1506 (Statement of Service-for Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes) * Marriage certificate * Enlisted Record Brief * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 31 January 1999, 31 October 1994, 12 September 1990, and 30 March 1993 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * Orders 02-182-00032, reduction to SFC/E-7 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003927

    Original file (20110003927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon his first discharge from active duty in 1990, he was told that they couldn’t put honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) because he had served less than 180 days. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, stated an honorable discharge was a separation with honor. Notwithstanding the DD Form 214 of another individual submitted by the applicant, the evidence shows the applicant, as a member of the USAR, was in an entry level status during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025111

    Original file (20100025111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of his uncharacterized character of service to honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Only the honorable characterization may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or ADT, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted (emphasis added). Thus,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009234

    Original file (20090009234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was involuntarily separated from the Illinois Army National Guard (ILARNG) after 16 years and 8 months of active service. In general, the QRP provides for a review every two years of Reserve Component Soldiers serving in ARNG units and USAR TPUs who have 20 or more years of qualifying service for non-regular retired pay and who are within the zones of consideration. The evidence of record shows that the applicant entered the AGR program on 8 May 1988 and served...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020585

    Original file (20120020585.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his latest DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank as captain (CPT) and his pay grade as O-3. There is no evidence that he served in an active duty status and was issued a DD Form 214 after this date. Army Regulation 635-5 provides that the DD Form 214 is a record of active service at the time of release, retirement or discharge from the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018991

    Original file (20090018991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, through his United States Senator: * That his name be "cleared of the slander and libel stating that I was AWOL [absent without leave]" * That his rank be adjusted to something higher, such as lieutenant colonel * That his student loans be repaid * That his retirement points be updated * That he receive a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for his Reserve Army Nurse Corps service 2. The applicant enlisted in the Pennsylvania Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090557C070212

    Original file (2003090557C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In the applicant's original 10 November 1999 application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), he stated, in effect, that he should have been allowed to serve until the end of his enlistment, that he was discharged due to his age, and that his enlistment contract was breached. Department of Military Affairs, State of Illinois Orders Number 104-87, dated 29 May 1996 show that the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard and transferred...