Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003958
Original file (20090003958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


		BOARD DATE:	  26 August 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003958 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that:

	a.  his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), with the period ending 27 May 1993, be corrected to show he entered active duty in March 1991; and  

	b.  his DD Form 214 separation date be corrected to show he served 1 year in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Individual Ready Reserve (IRR).

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly shows he enlisted in March 1992 instead of March 1991.  He further states that his DD Form 214 does not show he served in the USAR IRR after his discharge from active duty. 

3.  The applicant provides no addition documents in support of this case.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of 
Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 
3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  A DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 22 January 1975, shows that the applicant enlisted in the USAR delayed entry program (DEP) on 28 October 1991 for a period of 8 years. On 26 March 1992, the applicant was discharged from the DEP for the purpose of enlisting in the Regular Army (RA).  He served 4 month and 27 days in the DEP.

3.  A DD Form 4/3, dated 26 March 1992, shows that the applicant enlisted in the RA on 26 March 1992 for a period of 3 years.  

4.  546th Personnel Service Company Orders 96-102R, dated 25 May 1993, show that the applicant was discharged from the U.S. Army effective 27 May 1993.

5.  On 27 May 1993, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 14-12b, Army Regulation 635-200 and issued an under honorable conditions discharge certificate, by reason of misconduct after completing 1 year, 2 months, and 2 days of creditable active service.  There is no evidence in his military records that show he was transferred to the USAR IRR after his discharge from active duty. 

6.  Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 26 March 1992.  Item 12b (Separation Date this Period) shows the effective date of his separation as 27 May 1993.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the 
Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be changed to show he entered active duty in March 1991 and to show that he served in the IRR 1 year after his discharge from active duty.  Evidence of record shows he enlisted in the DEP on 28 October 1991 and entered active duty on 26 March 1992.  Soldiers in the DEP are not on active duty, and DEP is considered as inactive service.  Therefore, 26 March 1992 is properly shown in item 12a of his DD Form 214 with the period ending 27 May 1993.

2.  The applicant contends that his separation date on his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he served 1 year in the USAR IRR after his discharge from active duty.  Evidence of record shows on 27 May 1993, the applicant was discharged from active duty by reason of misconduct.  There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided evidence that shows he served in the USAR IRR after his discharge from active duty or that he enlisted in the USAR. 

3.  However, the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  The applicant's contention that he served in the USAR IRR occurred outside the period covered by the DD Form 214.  Therefore, the separation date of 25 May 1993 on his DD Form 214 is correct.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003958





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003958



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009321

    Original file (20100009321.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's service record does not indicate he completed 90 days or more of continuous active duty after 11 June 1991. Therefore, the applicant is not eligible for issuance of a DD Form 214 to show the following actions which occurred after the period covered his DD Form 214, dated 11 June 1991: * promotion to SGT/E-5 effective 29 June 1992 * 2 years of time in grade which he served in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020082

    Original file (20110020082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not contain the promotion orders showing the promotion date. He provided a memorandum he submitted to the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, St Louis, MO, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, dated 11 June 1999, requesting reconsideration for promotion to CPT. He provided a memorandum he received from an official at the USAR Personnel Command, St Louis, MO, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, dated 3 November 1999, stating this memorandum was in response to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009121C070205

    Original file (20060009121C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time of his selection for promotion to major on 5 March 1991, he was an ARNG officer. The applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to major while on active duty. The applicant should have been considered for promotion to major by a mandatory Reserve promotion board one year after the date of his transfer to the IRR in 1994 and again in 1995.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008896

    Original file (20100008896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of: * his Officer Record Brief (ORB), dated March 1992 * Orders 10-3-4-76, dated 26 January 1991 * his DA Form 78 (Recommendation for Promotion of Officer), dated 10 November 1992 * his DA Form 1506 (Statement of Service), dated 7 February 1991 * his DA Forms 67-8 (U.S. Army Officer Evaluation Report (OER)) for the period 11 July 1991 through 23 June 1992 and 24 June 1992 through 3 December 1992 * Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) message, date time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000112

    Original file (20100000112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: a. award of military occupational specialty (MOS) 94B1O (Cook); b. award and issue of the following medals: * Army Achievement Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Southwest Asia Service Medal * Kuwait Liberation Medal * Cold War Certificate c. correction of section VII (Current and Previous Assignments) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record (PQR)) to show all her assignments. The DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089368C070403

    Original file (2003089368C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted retirement points for the years 1993 through 2003. The evidence of record also confirms that the applicant completed 22 years of qualifying years of service for Reserve retirement purposes. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016049

    Original file (20100016049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result, documents were not available in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) for review by the 1994 and 1995 Department of the Army (DA) CPT Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSB). He states he was selected by the 2010 CPT Promotion Board with the same documents in his 2010 board file that USA HRC presumes were reviewed in 1994 and 1995, with the exception of an additional unfavorable OER in 2009. The applicant contends that his records should be considered for promotion to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019633

    Original file (20100019633.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the removal of memoranda, dated 29 January 1993 and 1 March 1994, from his records that show he was non-selected for promotion to captain (CPT) twice. On 24 February 1992, his immediate commander initiated a request to separate him in accordance with paragraph 2-12 of Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers). On 1 March 1994, by memorandum also addressed to the applicant at his Birmingham, AL address, HRC-STL again notified him that he was considered for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011014

    Original file (20140011014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record contains a DA Form 1506 (Statement of Service - for Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes), dated 15 August 2005, wherein it shows his projected demobilization date was 20 August 2005 and he had served as follows in the: * USAR DEP - 3 March to 26 June 1989 * RA - 27 June to 9 November 1989 * USAR (not on active duty) - 5 December 2003 to 6 June 2004 * USAR (on active duty) - 7 June 2004 to 20 August 2005 7. His record does not contain orders or any other...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004788

    Original file (20090004788.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides a MEPS accession document that was prepared upon his enlistment in the RA and entry on active duty, which is dated 8 January 1991. The DD Form 4 on file confirms the applicant enlisted in the RA and entered active duty on 8 January 1991, not 1992, as is indicated in item 12a of his DD Form 214.